FIR Quashing Advocate | Paresh M Modi | 9925002031 | Gujarat | Mumbai | Delhi । Lawyer for Quashing of FIR

Advocate Paresh M Modi, based in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, is a renowned legal expert in handling FIR Quashing Petitions and FIR Quashing Cases across prominent High Courts, including the Gujarat High Court, Bombay High Court, and Delhi High Court. Known for his meticulous approach and in-depth knowledge of criminal law, Advocate Modi has successfully represented numerous clients in challenging unwarranted FIRs, providing them with essential legal recourse and protection from potential legal repercussions. His expertise covers various grounds for FIR quashing, such as false allegations, lack of evidence, and malicious intent, where he effectively argues for justice and fair trial rights. With a proven track record in FIR quashing matters, Advocate Paresh M Modi is trusted for his strategic litigation approach, ensuring his clients’ rights are upheld while helping them navigate complex legal processes. His commitment and high success rate make him a sought-after advocate for those seeking FIR quashing relief at a higher judiciary level.

Gujarat

Gujarat is a thriving state known for its industrial development, cultural heritage, and economic significance. From the vibrant streets of Ahmedabad to the serene landscapes of Gir Forest, Gujarat offers a blend of tradition and modernity. Key industries include textiles, petrochemicals, and tourism.

Mumbai – Bombay

Mumbai, formerly known as Bombay, is India’s financial capital and the heart of the Bollywood film industry. Known for its iconic landmarks like the Gateway of India and Marine Drive, Mumbai is a bustling metropolis blending history, culture, and innovation.

Pune

Pune is a vibrant city celebrated for its educational institutions, IT hubs, and cultural significance. Often referred to as the “Oxford of the East,” Pune offers a perfect mix of traditional Maharashtrian culture and modern lifestyle.

Delhi – New Delhi

Delhi, India’s capital city, combines historical grandeur with contemporary living. Home to iconic monuments like the Red Fort and India Gate, Delhi is a hub for politics, culture, and diverse cuisines.

Gandhinagar

Gandhinagar, the capital of Gujarat, is a planned city renowned for its greenery and structured layout. It houses significant landmarks like Akshardham Temple and serves as an administrative and cultural center.

Lawyers in India

Lawyers are legal professionals who provide advice, guidance, and representation in legal matters. They may specialize in various areas of law, such as corporate law, family law, criminal law, or civil law. In general, lawyers help clients understand their legal rights, draft documents, and represent them in courts or other legal forums.

Advocates in India

Advocates are a specific type of lawyer who is authorized to appear in court on behalf of clients. In India, the term “advocate” refers to a licensed professional who is enrolled with a state bar council and has the right to practice before courts. All advocates are lawyers, but not all lawyers are advocates, as some may only offer legal advice or work in legal research.

High Court Advocates in India

High Court Advocates are specialized advocates who represent clients in the High Court, the highest judicial authority in each state or union territory. These advocates handle complex legal issues, including constitutional matters, civil and criminal appeals, writ petitions, and public interest litigations. Their practice often involves intricate legal arguments and precedents.

High Court Lawyers in India

High Court Lawyers in India are qualified legal professionals enrolled with respective State Bar Councils and authorized to appear, act, and plead before any of the High Courts in India. They handle a wide range of matters including civil, criminal, writ petitions, constitutional law, service matters, appeals, and revisions, ensuring justice through expert representation and interpretation of law.

Criminal Lawyers in India

Criminal Lawyers focus on defending individuals or entities accused of committing crimes. They represent clients in cases ranging from minor offenses like theft to major crimes such as murder or corruption. Criminal lawyers provide defense strategies, negotiate plea deals, and represent clients in trials to ensure a fair legal process.

Criminal Advocates in India

Criminal Advocates in India specialize in defending accused persons or representing complainants in criminal proceedings under the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), and other criminal statutes. They deal with bail matters, anticipatory bail, charge-sheet defenses, trials, appeals, revisions, and quashing petitions before Magistrate Courts, Sessions Courts, High Courts, and the Supreme Court of India.

FIR Quashing Lawyers in India

FIR Quashing Lawyers specialize in seeking the dismissal or quashing of First Information Reports (FIRs) filed against clients. If a person believes an FIR is false, baseless, or lacks merit, these lawyers file petitions in higher courts (such as the High Court) to have the FIR quashed, which can help prevent unwarranted investigations or trials.

FIR Quashing Advocates in India

FIR Quashing Advocates in India are legal experts who assist clients in getting false or baseless First Information Reports (FIRs) quashed before the Hon’ble High Courts under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). They prepare petitions, legal arguments, and supporting documents to show that the FIR is malicious, frivolous, or without any prima facie evidence, thereby protecting the rights and reputation of the petitioner.

FIR Quashing in India: A Comprehensive Overview

In India, First Information Report (FIR) quashing is a legal remedy where individuals, organizations, or other entities seek to annul or nullify an FIR registered against them. FIRs play a critical role in the criminal justice system, marking the start of an investigation. However, there are scenarios where the FIR may not be legally valid or is seen as a tool for harassment, prompting affected parties to seek its quashing through higher courts.

1. Reasons for FIR Quashing

The reasons for FIR quashing may vary based on the specific facts and circumstances of each case. Common reasons include the following:

1. Malicious Prosecution and Abuse of Process: Sometimes, FIRs are filed out of malice, vengeance, or personal enmity. In such cases, the FIR might be considered a misuse of the legal process. The Supreme Court in State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992) established guidelines for quashing FIRs based on the abuse of legal processes, stating that the FIR can be quashed if it lacks substance or is motivated by ulterior motives. This case laid down several other specific grounds, which are widely relied upon.
2. Lack of Prima Facie Case: If the FIR fails to establish a prima facie case or does not reveal an offense, the courts may quash it. For instance, in Indian Oil Corporation v. NEPC India Ltd. (2006), the Supreme Court noted that an FIR should disclose essential facts that make up the offense. If it fails to do so, it can be quashed.
3. Settlement Between Parties in Non-Compoundable Offenses: In offenses that are non-compoundable but are civil in nature, such as matrimonial disputes, the court may quash the FIR if the parties have settled amicably. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab (2012), the Supreme Court held that in cases of matrimonial disputes, the courts could quash the FIR based on a compromise between the parties, especially if the case did not involve public interest or heinous crimes.
4. Cases Involving Minor Irregularities or Mistakes: If the FIR is filed with minor irregularities that do not affect the substance of the case, it may be quashed. For instance, if the complainant lacks knowledge of the facts or the complaint lacks clarity, the FIR may be quashed to prevent unnecessary legal action.

2. Grounds for FIR Quashing

The following are grounds for quashing an FIR as laid down by the courts:

1. No Evidence to Support the Allegations: One of the primary grounds is the absence of evidence to support the allegations. If the FIR lacks corroborative evidence, it can be quashed to prevent unnecessary harassment. In State of Karnataka v. L. Muniswamy (1977), the Supreme Court emphasized that the power to quash is necessary to prevent abuse of legal proceedings where there is no evidence against the accused.
2. FIR Does Not Disclose a Cognizable Offense: If the FIR does not disclose a cognizable offense or fails to specify any offense, it may be quashed. The Bhajan Lal (1992) judgment listed this ground among the scenarios for FIR quashing, noting that if the allegations do not constitute a cognizable offense, the FIR may be dismissed.
3. Barred by Limitation: FIRs registered for offenses beyond the statute of limitations can also be quashed. For instance, in civil disputes that exceed the limitation period, the courts may quash the FIR to prevent misuse of legal procedures. The judgment in S.L. Kapoor v. Jagmohan (1980) stressed that FIRs filed after the limitation period could be quashed on this ground.
4. Where Proceedings are Vexatious or Oppressive: FIRs filed solely to harass or oppress an individual fall within this ground for quashing. The Supreme Court in Pepsi Foods Ltd. v. Special Judicial Magistrate (1998) observed that FIRs filed for harassment should be quashed to protect individuals from oppressive or vexatious proceedings.
5. Breach of Fundamental Rights: If a FIR violates an individual’s fundamental rights, such as the right to personal liberty or freedom of speech, it may be quashed. In Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015), the Supreme Court ruled that FIRs filed under Section 66A of the IT Act, which infringed upon freedom of speech, were unconstitutional and hence quashed.

3. Best Arguments for FIR Quashing

When arguing for FIR quashing, the following points are often effective:

1. Lack of Mens Rea (Criminal Intent): An argument centered on the absence of criminal intent can be effective, especially if the offense requires mens rea as an essential element. For example, in economic offenses or civil disputes, counsel may argue that the intention to commit a crime is absent, as in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab (2012).
2. The FIR is a Counterblast or Retaliatory Action: If the FIR appears to be retaliatory in nature, filed to settle personal scores, this argument can support quashing. The Supreme Court in Preeti Gupta v. State of Jharkhand (2010) acknowledged that false FIRs in matrimonial disputes are often filed as counterblasts, which can lead to their quashing.
3. Violation of Natural Justice or Fair Trial Rights: If the registration of a FIR infringes upon natural justice principles or the accused’s right to a fair trial, the court may quash it. For instance, in State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan (2019), it was argued that the FIR was filed in violation of procedural fairness, prompting the court to quash it.
4. Settled Between the Parties: In cases where a settlement is reached between the parties, courts can quash the FIR, especially in non-compoundable cases that do not affect public interest. Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab (2014) emphasized that FIRs could be quashed in cases of compromise, particularly for disputes of a private nature.

4. Supreme Court and High Courts’ Observations on FIR Quashing

The Supreme Court and various High Courts have offered critical observations on FIR quashing, particularly highlighting the necessity for judicial restraint and discretion.

1. Supreme Court’s Guidelines in Bhajan Lal: The Supreme Court’s guidelines in Bhajan Lal (1992) remain fundamental. The judgment highlighted specific grounds and scenarios where quashing is appropriate, such as when the allegations are inherently improbable or there is an apparent abuse of process.
2. Bombay High Court Observations: The Bombay High Court has reiterated in various cases the importance of discretion in quashing FIRs. In Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Maharashtra (2001), the court emphasized that quashing is permissible only if continuing proceedings would serve no purpose or cause undue harassment.
3. Gujarat High Court’s Stance on Matrimonial and Civil Disputes: The Gujarat High Court in cases like Siddharth Ganshyam Sheth v. State of Gujarat (2014) has noted that in civil and matrimonial disputes, quashing an FIR based on settlement is often justified. This stance aligns with the Supreme Court’s approach, where amicable settlements are encouraged in non-compoundable offenses that do not affect the public.
4. Importance of Judicial Discretion in Criminal Proceedings: The Supreme Court has consistently highlighted that FIR quashing must be exercised with caution. In Jitendra Raghuvanshi v. Babita Raghuvanshi (2013), the Court ruled that while quashing may be granted in cases with amicable settlements, it should not be extended to heinous or public offenses.

Conclusion

FIR quashing in India is a crucial tool that balances individual rights and the legal process. The courts, through a series of landmark judgments, have laid down comprehensive grounds for quashing an FIR and have empowered individuals to prevent unwarranted legal actions. At the same time, FIR quashing is exercised with restraint to maintain public order, protect fundamental rights, and uphold justice.

IN GUJARATI LANGUAGE

એફ.આઈ.આર. ક્વોશિંગ એડવોકેટ । પરેશ એમ મોદી । 9925002031 | ક્વોશિંગ ઓફ એફઆઈઆર લોયર

એડવોકેટ પરેશ એમ. મોદી, અમદાવાદ, ગુજરાતમાં સ્થિત, ગુજરાત હાઇકોર્ટ, બોમ્બે હાઇકોર્ટ અને દિલ્હી હાઇકોર્ટ માં FIR ક્વાશિંગ અરજી અને કેસોમાં પ્રખ્યાત કાનૂની નિષ્ણાંત છે. ફોજદારી કાયદામાં તેમના વિશિષ્ટ જ્ઞાન અને સમજણ માટે ઓળખાતા એડવોકેટ મોદીએ અસત્ય આરોપો, પુરાવાની ઉણપ અને દુર્ભાવના જેવા વિવિધ આધાર પર FIR ક્વાશિંગ માટે તેમના ક્લાયન્ટોને ન્યાય અને સંરક્ષણ પૂરૂં પાડ્યું છે. FIR ક્વાશિંગ સંબંધિત આ બાબતોમાં તેમના ઉચ્ચ સફળતા દર અને વ્યૂહાત્મક વલણના કારણે તેઓ માન્યતાપ્રાપ્ત છે. FIR ક્વાશિંગના કટોકટીના મામલાઓમાં તે પોતાના ક્લાયન્ટ્સના હિત અને અધિકારોને સચોટ રીતે રક્ષણ આપે છે અને જટિલ કાનૂની પ્રક્રિયાઓમાં તેમને માર્ગદર્શન આપે છે. ઉચ્ચ ન્યાયાલય સ્તરે FIR ક્વાશિંગ માટે ન્યાયિક રાહત માટે પાત્ર એવા નાગરિકો માટે એડવોકેટ પરેશ એમ. મોદી પ્રથમ પસંદગી બન્યા છે.

ગુજરાત

ગુજરાત એ તેના ઔદ્યોગિક વિકાસ, સાંસ્કૃતિક વારસા અને આર્થિક મહત્વ માટે પ્રખ્યાત રાજ્ય છે. અમદાવાદના રંગીન માર્ગોથી લઈને ગીરના શાંત પ્રાકૃતિક નઝારાઓ સુધી, ગુજરાત પરંપરા અને આધુનિકતાનું અનોખું મિશ્રણ પ્રદાન કરે છે. મુખ્ય ઉદ્યોગોમાં ટેક્સટાઇલ્સ, પેટ્રોકેમિકલ્સ અને પર્યટનનો સમાવેશ થાય છે.

મુંબઇ – બૉમ્બે

મુંબઇ, જેને પહેલાં બૉમ્બે તરીકે ઓળખવામાં આવતું હતું, ભારતનું નાણાકીય મથક અને બોલિવૂડ ફિલ્મ ઉદ્યોગનું કેન્દ્ર છે. ગેટવે ઓફ ઇન્ડિયા અને મેરિન ડ્રાઇવ જેવા પ્રખ્યાત સ્મારકો માટે જાણીતી, મુંબઇ એ ઇતિહાસ, સંસ્કૃતિ અને નવીનતાનું ઉદાર મિશ્રણ ધરાવતું જીવંત મહાનગર છે.

પૂણે

પૂણે એ શૈક્ષણિક સંસ્થાઓ, આઇટી હબ્સ અને સાંસ્કૃતિક મહત્વ માટે ઉજવાતું શહેર છે. “પૂર્વના ઑક્સફર્ડ” તરીકે ઓળખાતું પૂણે પરંપરાગત મહારાષ્ટ્રિય સંસ્કૃતિ અને આધુનિક જીવનશૈલીનું સંપૂર્ણ મિશ્રણ પ્રદાન કરે છે.

દિલ્હી – નવી દિલ્હી

દિલ્હી, ભારતની રાજધાની, ઇતિહાસિક વૈભવ અને આધુનિક જીવનશૈલીને એકસાથે સમાવી રાખે છે. રેડ ફોર્ટ અને ઇન્ડિયા ગેટ જેવા પ્રખ્યાત સ્મારકો ધરાવતું દિલ્હી રાજકારણ, સંસ્કૃતિ અને વિવિધ વાનગીઓ માટેનું કેન્દ્ર છે.

ગાંધીનગર

ગાંધીનગર, ગુજરાતની રાજધાની, યોજનાબદ્ધ શહેર તરીકે તેની હરીયાળી અને સુવિધાયુક્ત વ્યવસ્થિત નિમણૂક માટે જાણીતી છે. અહીં અક્ષરધામ મંદિર જેવા મહત્વના સ્મારકો છે અને તે રાજ્યના વહીવટીતંત્ર અને સાંસ્કૃતિક કેન્દ્ર તરીકે કામ કરે છે.

ભારતમાં વકીલો

વકીલો એ કાનૂની વ્યાવસાયિકો છે, જે કાનૂની બાબતોમાં સલાહ, માર્ગદર્શન અને પ્રતિનિધિત્વ પૂરો પાડે છે. તેઓ વિવિધ કાનૂની ક્ષેત્રોમાં નિષ્ણાત હોઈ શકે છે, જેમ કે કોર્પોરેટ કાયદો, કુટુંબ કાયદો, ફોજદારી કાયદો અથવા નાગરિક કાયદો. સામાન્ય રીતે, વકીલો ગ્રાહકોને તેમના કાનૂની અધિકારો સમજવામાં મદદ કરે છે, દસ્તાવેજો તૈયાર કરે છે અને કોર્ટ અથવા અન્ય કાનૂની મંચ પર રજૂઆત કરે છે.

ભારતમાં એડવોકેટ્સ

એડવોકેટ્સ એ એક ખાસ પ્રકારના વકીલો છે, જેમને ગ્રાહકોની તરફેથી કોર્ટમાં હાજર થવાનો અધિકાર છે. ભારતમાં, “એડવોકેટ” એ તે લાઇસન્સ ધરાવતા વ્યાવસાયિકોને સંબોધે છે, જે રાજ્ય બાર કાઉન્સિલ સાથે નોંધાયેલા હોય અને કોર્ટમાં પ્રેક્ટિસ કરવાનો અધિકાર ધરાવે છે. તમામ એડવોકેટ વકીલ હોય છે, પરંતુ તમામ વકીલો એડવોકેટ નથી, કારણ કે કેટલાક માત્ર કાનૂની સલાહ આપે છે અથવા કાનૂની સંશોધનમાં કામ કરે છે.

ભારતમાં હાઇકોર્ટના એડવોકેટ્સ

હાઇ કોર્ટના એડવોકેટ્સ ખાસ કરીને હાઇ કોર્ટમાં ગ્રાહકોનું પ્રતિનિધિત્વ કરે છે, જે દરેક રાજ્ય અથવા કેન્દ્રશાસિત પ્રદેશની ઉચ્ચતમ ન્યાયિક સત્તા છે. આ એડવોકેટ્સ જટિલ કાનૂની મુદ્દાઓ સંભાળે છે, જેમાં બંધારણીય બાબતો, નાગરિક અને ફોજદારી અપીલો, રિટ અરજી અને જાહેર હિતની અરજીનો સમાવેશ થાય છે. તેમની પ્રેક્ટિસમાં મોટા ભાગે જટિલ કાનૂની દલીલો અને પૂર્વવત ન્યાય નિર્ણયોનો સમાવેશ થાય છે.

ભારતમાં ફોજદારી કાયદાના વકીલ

ફોજદારી કાયદાના વકીલ એ વ્યક્તિઓ અથવા સંસ્થાઓનું પ્રતિનિધિત્વ કરે છે, જેઓએ ગુનાઓ કરવામાં આરોપ છે. તેઓ ચોરી જેવા નાના ગુનાઓથી લઈને હત્યા અથવા ભ્રષ્ટાચાર જેવા મોટા ગુનાઓ સુધીના કેસોમાં ગ્રાહકોનું પ્રતિનિધિત્વ કરે છે. ફોજદારી કાયદાના વકીલ રક્ષણાત્મક નીતિ બનાવે છે, પલી ડીલ્સ પર વાટાઘાટ કરે છે અને ન્યાયપ્રક્રિયા નિષ્ઠાપૂર્વક પૂર્ણ થાય તેની ખાતરી કરવા માટે ટ્રાયલમાં ગ્રાહકોનું પ્રતિનિધિત્વ કરે છે.

ભારતમાં FIR રદ કરાવવાના વકીલ

FIR રદ કરાવવાના વકીલ તે વકીલ છે, જે ગ્રાહકો સામે દાખલ થયેલા પ્રથમ જાણકારી અહેવાલ (FIR) રદ કરાવવાનો પ્રયાસ કરે છે. જો કોઈ વ્યક્તિ માને છે કે FIR ખોટું છે, આધારહીન છે અથવા તેમાં કોઈ તથ્ય નથી, તો આ વકીલ ઉચિત કોર્ટ (જેમ કે હાઇ કોર્ટ)માં અરજી દાખલ કરે છે, જેથી FIR રદ કરાવી શકાય અને અનાવશ્યક તપાસ અથવા કેસ ટાળી શકાય.

 ભારતમાં FIR રદ કરવી: સંપૂર્ણ વિગતવાર માહિતી

ભારતમાં પ્રથમ માહિતી રિપોર્ટ (FIR) રદ કરવું એ એક કાનૂની ઉપાય છે, જ્યાં વ્યક્તિ, સંસ્થા અથવા અન્ય સંસ્થાઓ તેમના વિરુદ્ધ નોંધાયેલી FIRને ખોટી કે બિનઆવશ્યક ઠરાવવાના પ્રયત્ન કરે છે. FIR રદ કરાવવાનો ઉદ્દેશ તે છે કે જ્યાં FIR કાનૂની માન્યતા વગર હોય, બિનજરૂરી હોઈ શકે છે અથવા ક્યારેક કોઈ વ્યકિતને હેરાન કરવા માટે ઉપયોગમાં લેવામાં આવે છે.

1. FIR રદ કરવાના કારણો

FIR રદ કરવાના કારણો દરેક કેસની ચોક્કસ પરિસ્થિતિઓ પર આધાર રાખે છે. સામાન્ય કારણો નીચે મુજબ છે:

ક. ખોટો કેસ અને કાનૂની પ્રક્રિયાનો દુરુપયોગ: કેટલીકવાર FIR દોષદ્રષ્ટિ અથવા બદલા લેવા માટે નોંધવામાં આવે છે. આવા કેસોમાં FIR કાનૂની પ્રક્રિયાનો દુરુપયોગ ગણાય છે. સુપ્રીમ કોર્ટના State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992) કેસમાં આ પ્રકારની FIR રદ કરવા માટેના કેટલાક ગ્રાઉન્ડ્સ નક્કી કર્યા છે, જ્યાં FIR ખોટી હોય છે અથવા કોઈ નકામી ઉદ્દેશ્યથી નોંધવામાં આવી હોય.

ખ. પ્રાથમિક દ્રષ્ટિમાં કેસની રૂપરેખા ન દેખાવા: જો FIR કોઈ ગુનાની પ્રાથમિક રૂપરેખા દર્શાવતી નથી, તો કોર્ટ તેને રદ કરી શકે છે. Indian Oil Corporation v. NEPC India Ltd. (2006) કેસમાં સુપ્રીમ કોર્ટે જણાવ્યું હતું કે FIR એ ગુનાની મૂળભૂત વિગતો દર્શાવવી જોઈએ. જો તે આ પ્રકારની વિગતો રજૂ કરતી નથી, તો તે રદ કરી શકાય છે.

ગ. નિર્વાહ્ય મામલાઓમાં સમાધાન: જ્યાં ગુના નાગરિક સ્વરૂપનો છે અને પક્ષો વચ્ચે સમાધાન થયો હોય, ત્યાં કોર્ટ FIR રદ કરી શકે છે. Gian Singh v. State of Punjab (2012) કેસમાં સુપ્રીમ કોર્ટે જણાવ્યું હતું કે લગ્નના વિવાદોમાં સમાધાન દ્વારા FIR રદ કરી શકાય છે, ખાસ કરીને જો કેસનો જાહેર હિત પર અસર ન પડે.

ઘ. નાની કાનુની અનિયમિતતા અથવા કાનૂની ભૂલો: જ્યાં FIRમાં નાની ભૂલો હોય અને તે કેસના તત્વોને અસર કરતી નથી, ત્યાં FIR રદ થઈ શકે છે.

2. FIR રદ કરવાના આધાર

FIR રદ કરવાના કેટલાક આધાર કોર્ટોએ નક્કી કર્યા છે:

ક. પુરાવાના અભાવ: FIRમાં પોષક પુરાવાના અભાવના કારણે તે રદ થવાની શક્યતા છે. State of Karnataka v. L. Muniswamy (1977) કેસમાં સુપ્રીમ કોર્ટે જણાવ્યું હતું કે જ્યારે આરોપ સામે કોઈ પુરાવો નથી ત્યારે FIR રદ કરવી જરૂરી છે.

ખ. ગુનો દર્શાવતા આધારની ઉણપ: જો FIRમાં ગુનો દર્શાવતો આધાર નથી કે કાનૂની રીતે યોગ્ય ગુનો દર્શાવતી નથી, તો તે રદ થઈ શકે છે. Bhajan Lal (1992) કેસમાં આ પ્રકારના આધારને જોર આપીને આ પ્રકારના FIR રદ કરી શકાય છે.

ગ. મર્યાદા સમયગાળાનો ઉલ્લંઘન: કાયદાની મર્યાદા પાર થયેલ ગુનાઓ માટે નોંધાયેલા FIRને પણ રદ કરી શકાય છે. S.L. Kapoor v. Jagmohan (1980) કેસમાં આ ઉલ્લેખ કરવામાં આવ્યો હતો.

ઘ. હેરાન કરવાના કારણો: કોર્ટોએ હેરાનગતિ માટે FIR દાખલ થયેલી હોય ત્યાં તે રદ કરી શકે છે. Pepsi Foods Ltd. v. Special Judicial Magistrate (1998) કેસમાં આ પ્રકારના દંડાત્મક પ્રક્રિયાઓને રદ કરવાની જરૂર છે.

3. FIR રદ કરવા માટે શ્રેષ્ઠ દલીલો

FIR રદ કરાવવા માટેની કેટલાક શ્રેષ્ઠ તર્કો:

ક. મેનસ રિયાનો અભાવ: ગુનાની મેનસ રિયા (આપરી ધ્યેય)નો અભાવ દર્શાવતી દલીલ ઉપયોગી સાબિત થાય છે. જેમ કે આર્થિક ગુનાઓમાં, વકીલ એવું દલીલ કરી શકે છે કે ગુનાનો ઇરાદો નથી.

ખ. બદલો લેવાના કારણો: જો FIR વળતર રૂપે નોંધવામાં આવી હોય તે દર્શાવવું મદદરૂપ થાય છે.

ગ. સમાધાન થવા પર: ખાસ કરીને નાગરિક વિવાદોમાં સમાધાન થાય ત્યાં કોર્ટ FIR રદ કરી શકે છે. Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab (2014) કેસમાં સુપ્રીમ કોર્ટે ઉલ્લેખ કર્યો હતો.

4. સુપ્રીમ કોર્ટ અને હાઈકોર્ટની FIR રદ કરવા બાબતે ટિપ્પણીઓ

ક. સુપ્રીમ કોર્ટના ભજનલાલ માર્ગદર્શકો: Bhajan Lal (1992) કેસના માર્ગદર્શકો FIR રદ કરવા માટે મહત્વપૂર્ણ છે.

ખ. બોમ્બે હાઈકોર્ટના અવલોકન: Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Maharashtra (2001) કેસમાં બોમ્બે હાઈકોર્ટે જણાવ્યું હતું કે FIR જ ત્યાં રદ થવી જોઈએ જ્યાં તે કોઈ હેતુ સાધતી નથી.

ગ. ગુજરાત હાઈકોર્ટના મતે: Siddharth Ghanshyam Sheth v. State of Gujarat (2014) કેસમાં ઉલ્લેખ કર્યો હતો.

સમાપ્તી

ભારતમાં FIR રદ કરાવવી એ કાનૂની રીતે વ્યક્તિના હિતની રક્ષા અને ન્યાયની જાળવણી માટે મહત્વપૂર્ણ છે. એડવોકેટ પરેશ એમ મોદી તમને તમારી આવી કાનુની લડતમાં તમોને માર્ગદર્શન આપે છે અને કોર્ટમાં મદદ કરે છે.

Best Criminal Advocate | Paresh M Modi | Anticipatory Bail Lawyer | Regular Bail Advocate | FIR Quashing | Mumbai | Delhi | Gujarat

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly reputed Criminal Lawyer, based in Ahmedabad Gujarat for Anticipatory Bail, Regular Bail, FIR Quashing Cases, offers expert legal guidance across complex cases. Known for his deep understanding of the legal landscape, he is skilled in handling matters related to the FEMA Act, CBI cases, ED investigations, EOW cases, PMLA Act cases, SEBI cases, POCSO Act, and DRI department cases. Additionally, Advocate Modi is proficient in dealing with Prohibition Act cases, Juvenile Act cases, and FIR quashing cases. His services extend beyond Gujarat to Mumbai, Pune and Delhi, making him a sought-after legal professional for clients seeking precise legal advice and strong representation in sensitive matters. he is the Best Advocate for FIR Quashing Cases and Anticipatory Bail- Regular Bail matters in India.

Legal Words and Definitions

Lawyer

A professional legally qualified to advise clients and represent them before courts or legal authorities.

Advocate

A person enrolled under the Advocates Act, 1961, authorized to practice law and plead cases before courts in India.

Vakil

A traditional Indian term meaning lawyer or advocate who represents parties in legal matters.

Attorney

A legal representative or agent empowered to act for another in legal or business transactions.

Barrister

A lawyer trained in advocacy, typically practicing in higher courts, especially in the UK-style legal system.

Solicitor

A legal practitioner who advises clients, prepares legal documents, and may brief barristers for court appearances.

Lawyers

Lawyers are legal professionals who are qualified to practice law and provide legal assistance. They represent clients in court, prepare legal documents, and offer advice on legal matters. Lawyers specialize in various areas such as criminal law, civil law, property law, family law, and corporate law, ensuring that clients receive the best possible solutions tailored to their legal concerns.

Advocates

Advocates are a subset of lawyers who are specifically authorized to represent clients in court and plead on their behalf. They play a critical role in the judicial system by presenting cases, cross-examining witnesses, and interpreting laws to secure justice for their clients. Advocate Paresh M Modi, based in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, is one such experienced and reputed advocate known for his expertise in criminal, civil, and family matters.

Law Firms

Law firms are professional organizations comprising multiple lawyers and legal consultants who collaborate to provide comprehensive legal services. These firms cater to various legal needs, including litigation, corporate advisory, contract drafting, and dispute resolution. Advocate Paresh M Modi leads a distinguished law firm in Ahmedabad, offering solutions across diverse legal domains with a team of dedicated and experienced advocates.

Law Consultant

A law consultant is an experienced legal professional offering expert guidance on legal matters without necessarily representing clients in court. They assist individuals, businesses, and organizations in navigating complex legal frameworks by providing tailored advice and preventive legal strategies. Advocate Paresh M Modi, known for his profound legal knowledge, offers exceptional consultancy services to ensure clients’ compliance with legal regulations and mitigate risks.

Legal Services

Legal services encompass a wide range of professional assistance provided by lawyers, advocates, and law firms. These include legal advice, drafting legal documents, representing clients in court, negotiating settlements, and ensuring compliance with applicable laws. Advocate Paresh M Modi excels in offering top-notch legal services in Gujarat, addressing criminal cases, property disputes, divorce matters, and more.

Legal Advisor

A legal advisor is a professional who offers strategic legal guidance to individuals or organizations to ensure compliance with laws and regulations. They specialize in interpreting laws, drafting agreements, and providing insights to minimize risks and resolve disputes effectively. Advocate Paresh M Modi serves as a trusted legal advisor, helping clients achieve favorable outcomes in complex legal scenarios.

Law Firm

An organization of lawyers providing legal services, advice, and representation to individuals and businesses.

Best

The “Best” signifies unparalleled quality and performance. It represents the highest standard in a field, offering reliability, trust, and exceptional outcomes, ensuring client satisfaction through consistent excellence.

Top

“Top” defines the pinnacle of achievement or ranking in a profession. It emphasizes leadership, authority, and superior expertise, ensuring outstanding results that surpass expectations.

Expert

An “Expert” is a highly skilled and knowledgeable professional with years of experience in a specific field. They provide dependable advice and solutions tailored to meet complex requirements.

Specialist

A “Specialist” focuses on a specific domain, offering in-depth understanding and dedicated service. Their proficiency ensures precise, efficient, and effective solutions for specialized needs.

Near Me

Near Me is a phrase frequently used in searches to find nearby services, such as lawyers, courts, or legal assistance within a user’s location.

Type of Offenses and Crime

Murder

The unlawful killing of another person with intent. It is one of the most serious crimes and is punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Arson

The criminal act of deliberately setting property on fire. This crime is addressed under Section 435 and 436 of the IPC.

Assault

An intentional act causing physical harm or the threat of physical harm to another person. Sections 351 to 358 of the IPC deal with assault-related offenses.

Burglary

The illegal entry into a building or premises with the intent to commit a crime, typically theft. It is punishable under Sections 445 and 446 of the IPC.

Domestic Violence

Abuse or violence inflicted by a family member, typically within a household, often targeting women. The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 governs such cases.

Fraud

Deceptive practices or dishonest acts intended to secure financial or personal gain. It is addressed under Section 420 of the IPC and other laws.

Kidnapping

The unlawful taking or confinement of a person against their will, often for ransom. Sections 359 to 374 of the IPC cover kidnapping and abduction.

Organized Crime

Criminal activities coordinated by a group of individuals or a criminal syndicate, such as smuggling or drug trafficking. Organized crimes are addressed by special laws like MCOCA (Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act).

White Collar Crimes

Non-violent crimes committed for financial gain, often by professionals or businesses, such as embezzlement, insider trading, and money laundering.

Cybercrime

Illegal activities conducted online or using digital technology, such as hacking, phishing, or identity theft. The Information Technology Act, 2000 governs such offenses.

Robbery

The use of force or intimidation to unlawfully take someone’s property. Sections 390 to 402 of the IPC deal with robbery.

Human Trafficking

The illegal trade or exploitation of individuals, typically for forced labor or sexual exploitation. This crime is governed by Sections 370 and 371 of the IPC and other laws.

Sexual Offenses

Crimes such as rape, sexual harassment, and molestation. These offenses are covered under Sections 375 to 376D of the IPC and the POCSO Act for child victims.

Extortion

Obtaining money, property, or services through coercion, threats, or force. It is punishable under Sections 383 to 389 of the IPC.

Corruption

Abuse of power or position for personal gain, often involving bribery or misuse of public office. The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 deals with such crimes.

Financial Fraud

Focused on resolving financial fraud cases, providing meticulous analysis, strategic planning, and robust representation to protect interests and ensure justice.

Ponzi Scheme Fraud

“With deep expertise in Ponzi scheme fraud cases, handling victim representation, litigation, and legal remedies with precision and dedication.

Rape

A criminal act involving sexual intercourse without consent, punishable under Indian law for violating personal dignity and bodily autonomy.

Gang

A group of persons acting together, often associated with organized criminal or unlawful activities.

Loot

The unlawful taking of money or property by force or during violence, riot, or warlike situations.

Dhaad

A Gujarati term commonly used to describe robbery or sudden violent attack to snatch property or money.

Jaamin

A Gujarati word meaning security or surety given to release an accused person temporarily from custody.

Bail

A legal process that allows an accused to be released from custody while ensuring their appearance before the court.

Jamanat

The Hindi and Gujarati term for bail, referring to temporary release on surety or bond pending trial.

Jail

A place where accused or convicted persons are lawfully confined by the government authorities.

Drugs

Chemical substances that affect the body or mind; illegal drugs are controlled under the NDPS Act for misuse and trafficking.

NDPS

The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — a central law regulating and prohibiting drug abuse and trafficking in India.

GUJCTOC

The Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Act, enacted to curb organized crime, terrorism, and criminal syndicates in Gujarat.

FEMA

The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, governing foreign exchange transactions, cross-border trade, and currency violations in India.

PASA

The Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 (Gujarat), allowing preventive detention of habitual offenders and antisocial elements.

POCSO

The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, a special law ensuring protection of minors from sexual assault and exploitation.

Theft

The dishonest taking of another person’s movable property with intent to deprive them permanently of it.

FIR

First Information Report — the initial complaint or report registered by police upon receiving information of a cognizable offence.

Quashing

A judicial process by which a High Court cancels or nullifies criminal proceedings or an FIR if found illegal or unjust.

ACB

Anti-Corruption Bureau, a government agency investigating bribery, corruption, and misconduct by public servants.

CBI

Central Bureau of Investigation, India’s premier central agency for investigating serious crimes, corruption, and economic offences.

CID

Criminal Investigation Department, a state-level police branch specializing in criminal investigations and evidence gathering.

NIA

National Investigation Agency, India’s central counter-terrorism agency handling terrorism-related and national security cases.

DRI

Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, the apex intelligence agency for enforcing customs and anti-smuggling laws in India.

Cyber Crime

Criminal activity involving computers, networks, or digital devices — including hacking, online fraud, and data theft.

Amdavad

Commonly known as Ahmedabad, it is the largest city in Gujarat, India, known for its rich cultural heritage, legal institutions, business centers, and the Gujarat High Court.

Bharat

The traditional and constitutional name of India, representing the Republic of India, a sovereign democratic nation with diverse cultures, languages, and a strong legal and constitutional framework.

India

India, a democratic nation, has a comprehensive judiciary comprising Supreme Court, High Courts, and subordinate courts ensuring justice nationwide.

Indian Lawyers

Indian lawyers play a crucial role in upholding the Constitution and addressing legal disputes at various judicial levels.

Tribunal Court

Tribunal courts address specialized disputes, including tax, labor, and administrative matters, ensuring justice in niche areas.

District Court

District courts form the backbone of the judiciary, handling civil and criminal cases within their jurisdiction.

Sessions Court

Sessions courts are designated for serious criminal matters, ensuring justice through fair trials and judgments.

High Court

High Courts, at the state level, have jurisdiction over appeals and constitutional matters, ensuring justice across states.

Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of India is the apex judicial authority, ensuring constitutional justice and uniformity across the nation.

Advocate Paresh M Modi Working Areas (All Over Gujarat)

Advocate Paresh M Modi handles Premium Criminal, Civil, Family, Corporate, EOW, Cyber Crime, Land, SSRD & Property Matters across:

🔵 List of Districts in Gujarat

Ahmedabad, Amreli, Anand, Banaskantha, Bharuch, Bhavnagar, Botad, Dahod, Dang, Devbhumi Dwarka, Gandhinagar, Jamnagar, Junagadh, Kachchh, Kutch, Kheda, Mahisagar, Mehsana, Morbi, Narmada, Navsari, Panchmahal, Patan, Porbandar, Rajkot, Sabarkantha, Surat, Surendranagar, Tapi, Valsad, Vadodara (Baroda)

🔵 Major Cities of Gujarat Covered

Ahmedabad, Adalaj, Adipur, Ahwa, Aithor, Alang, Ambaji, Aambaliyasan, Amod, Amreli, Anand, Ankleshwar, Anjar, Atul, Babra, Bagasara, Balasinor, Banaskantha, Bardoli, Baroda, Bayad, Bavla, Bechraji, Bhachau, Bharuch, Bhavnagar, Bhuj, Bilimora, Borsad, Botad, Chaklasi, Chanasma, Chhota Udepur, Chikhli, Chorvad, Chotila, Dahisara, Dahod, Dahegam, Dakor, Danta, Dang, Dediapada, Deesa, Devbhumi Dwarka, Dhanera, Dhandhuka, Dholera, Dhrangadhra, Dhoraji, Dhrol, Dharampur, Disa, Diu, Dwarka, Fatehganj, Gandhidham, Gandhinagar, Gir Somnath, Ghoghamba, Godhra, Gondal, Gozaria, Halol, Halvad, Hansot, Harij, Himmat Nagar, Idar, Jamjodhpur, Jamnagar, Jasdan, Jetalpur, Jetpur, Jambughoda, Junagadh, Kachchh, Kadi, Kalol, Kanjari, Kanodar, Kankrej, Karjan, Katargam, Keshod, Kheda, Khambhat, Kodinar, Kosamba, Koth, Kutiyana, Lakhtar, Lalpur, Lathi, Limdi, Lunawada, Mahisagar, Mahemdavad, Mahuva, Malpur, Mandvi, Mansa, Manavadar, Mangrol, Matar, Mehsana, Modasa, Morbi, Muli, Mundra, Nadiad, Nakhatrana, Naliya, Narmada, Naroda, Narol, Navsari, Okha, Olpad, Padra, Palanpur, Paliyad, Palitana, Panchmahal, Patan, Petlad, Pipavav, Porbandar, Prantij, Radhanpur, Rajkot, Rajpipla, Ranavav, Ranpur, Sabarkantha, Salaya, Samakhiali, Sanand, Santrampur, Savarkundla, Savli, Sayan, Shahera, Shihor, Sidhpur, Sikka, Sojitra, Songadh, Surat, Surendranagar, Sutrapada, Talaja, Talod, Tapi, Tarapur, Tharad, Thasra, Umreth, Una, Unjha, Upleta, Umergam, Vadnagar, Vadodara, Vaghodia, Vaav, Valsad, Vansda, Vapi, Veraval, Vijapur, Visnagar, Viramgam, Vyara, Wankaner, Zinzuwada

Contact Advocate Paresh M Modi

📱 Mobile (WhatsApp SMS only – 9 am to 9 pm): +91 9925002031
☎️ Office Landline (Appointment Only – 10.30 am to 6.30 pm): +91-79-48001468
📧 Email: advocatepmmodi@gmail.com
🌐 Website: www.advocatepmmodi.in
🏢 Office Address:
Office No. C/112, Supath-2 Complex, Opp. Kohinoor Plaza Hotel,
Near Old Wadaj Bus Stand, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad – 380013, Gujarat, India
(Visit only with prior appointment)