Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) 2002 – Complete Legal Guide | PMLA Advocate in Ahmedabad, Gujarat

પ્રિવેન્શન ઓફ મની લોન્ડરિંગ એક્ટ (PMLA) 2002 – સંપૂર્ણ કાનૂની માર્ગદર્શિકા | PMLA વકીલ, અમદાવાદ, ગુજરાત

1. Introduction to PMLA – What is the Prevention of Money Laundering Act?

The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) is India’s primary legislation enacted to prevent, detect, and prosecute money laundering offences and to provide for the confiscation and forfeiture of property derived from, or involved in, money laundering. The Act came into force on 1st July 2005 and is administered by the Ministry of Finance, Government of India.

The PMLA was enacted in compliance with India’s obligations as a member of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) – an international inter-governmental body established to combat money laundering, terrorist financing, and related threats to the integrity of the global financial system.

The Act is enforced primarily by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and the Financial Intelligence Unit – India (FIU-IND). Over the years, several amendments – notably in 2005, 2009, 2012, and 2019 – have significantly expanded the scope, powers, and stringency of the PMLA regime.

૧. PMLA નો પરિચય – પ્રિવેન્શન ઓફ મની લોન્ડરિંગ એક્ટ શું છે?

પ્રિવેન્શન ઓફ મની લોન્ડરિંગ એક્ટ, 2002 (PMLA) ભારતનો મુખ્ય કાયદો છે, જે મની લોન્ડરિંગ (ગેરકાનૂની ધનની હેરફેર)ને રોકવા, શોધવા અને સજા આપવા, તથા ગુનામાંથી મળેલી સંપત્તિ જપ્ત કરવા માટે ઘડવામાં આવ્યો છે. આ કાયદો 1 જુલાઈ 2005ના રોજ અમલમાં આવ્યો અને નાણાં મંત્રાલય, ભારત સરકાર દ્વારા સંચાલિત થાય છે.

PMLA ભારતના ફાઇનાન્સિયલ એક્શન ટાસ્ક ફોર્સ (FATF)ના સભ્ય તરીકેની જવાબદારીઓ પૂર્ણ કરવા ઘડવામાં આવ્યો. આ કાયદો મુખ્યત્વે એન્ફોર્સમેન્ટ ડિરેક્ટોરેટ (ED) અને ફાઇનાન્સિયલ ઈન્ટેલિજન્સ યુનિટ – ઇન્ડિયા (FIU-IND) દ્વારા અમલમાં મૂકાય છે.

2. Constitutional and Legislative Framework of PMLA

The PMLA derives its constitutional validity from Entry 93 of the Union List (List I) of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India, which empowers Parliament to legislate on offences against laws with respect to matters in List I. The Act has been declared constitutionally valid by the Supreme Court of India in the landmark judgment of Vijay Madanlal Choudhary v. Union of India (2022).

The PMLA is a special statute that overrides the general provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) wherever there is a conflict, by virtue of the non-obstante clause under Section 71 of the Act. The Act applies to the whole of India and also extends to offences committed outside India if the proceeds of crime are found within India.

Key Legislative Milestones:

• PMLA enacted – 2002
• Came into force – 1st July 2005
• Amendment Act 2005 – Added new scheduled offences
• Amendment Act 2009 – Expanded banking obligations
• Amendment Act 2012 – Expanded predicate offences, added cross-border provisions
• Amendment Act 2019 – Removed requirement of police FIR for ED to register ECIR; search without FIR upheld

૨. PMLA નું બંધારણીય અને કાયદાકીય માળખું

PMLA ભારતીય બંધારણની સાતમી અનુસૂચિ (Schedule VII)ના Union List (List I) ની Entry 93 ના આધારે ઘડવામાં આવ્યો છે. સર્વોચ્ચ ન્યાયાલયે Vijay Madanlal Choudhary v. Union of India (2022)ના ઐતિહાસિક ચુકાદામાં PMLA ને બંધારણ સંગત ઠેરવ્યો છે.

PMLA વિશેષ કાયદો (Special Statute) છે અને CrPC ની સામાન્ય જોગવાઈઓ ઉપર અગ્રતા ધરાવે છે. PMLA સમગ્ર ભારતને લાગુ પડે છે અને ભારત બહાર આચરેલા ગુના, જ્યારે “Proceeds of Crime” ભારતમાં હોય, ત્યારે પણ લાગુ પડે છે.

3. Key Definitions under PMLA (Section 2)

Proceeds of Crime (Section 2(u)): Any property derived or obtained, directly or indirectly, by any person as a result of criminal activity relating to a scheduled offence, or the value of any such property. This is the cornerstone of every PMLA prosecution.

Money Laundering (Section 3): A person is said to commit money laundering if they directly or indirectly attempt to indulge, knowingly assist, knowingly are a party, or are actually involved in any process or activity connected with the proceeds of crime — including its concealment, possession, acquisition, use, or projecting it as untainted property.

Scheduled Offence: Offences listed in the Schedule to the PMLA — without a scheduled (predicate) offence, there can be no money laundering prosecution. The Schedule has three parts covering offences under the IPC, NDPS Act, Arms Act, Wildlife Protection Act, Immovable Property Act, Prevention of Corruption Act, SEBI Act, Customs Act, Companies Act, Income Tax Act, and many others.

Attachment: Prohibition of transfer, conversion, disposition, or movement of property by an order made under the PMLA.

Reporting Entity: A banking company, financial institution, intermediary, or a person carrying on a designated business or profession, obligated to file Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) with FIU-IND.

૩. PMLA હેઠળ મહત્વપૂર્ણ વ્યાખ્યાઓ (કલમ 2)

• Proceeds of Crime (ગુનાની આવક) [Section 2(u)]: ગુનાની (Scheduled Offence ની) કોઈ પ્રવૃત્તિ દ્વારા સીધી કે આડકતરી રીતે મળેલી કોઈ પણ સંપત્તિ.
• Money Laundering (મની લોન્ડરિંગ) [Section 3]: ગુનામાંથી મળેલી આવકને છુપાવવી, ધરાવવી, ઉપયોગ કરવો, અથવા સ્વચ્છ ધન તરીકે રજૂ કરવું.
• Scheduled Offence (અનુસૂચિ ગુનો): PMLA ની Schedule માં દર્શાવેલ ગુનો, જે Money Laundering ના Prosecution માટે પૂર્વ-શરત છે.
• Attachment (જોડાણ / અટૅચમેન્ટ): ED ના આદેશ દ્વારા સંપત્તિના સ્થાનાંતર, ઉપયોગ કે વેચાણ ઉપર પ્રતિબંધ.
• Reporting Entity: બેંક, NBFC, મધ્યયત, કે નિર્ધારિત ધંધો-વ્યવસાય ચલાવનાર, જે STR (Suspicious Transaction Report) FIU-IND ને ફાઇલ કરવા બંધાયેલ છે.

4. Key Sections of the PMLA Act – Detailed Analysis

Section 3 – Offence of Money Laundering

Defines the core offence. Any person who directly or indirectly attempts to indulge or knowingly assists or knowingly is a party or is actually involved in any process or activity connected with proceeds of crime and projecting it as untainted property is guilty of money laundering. The Supreme Court in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary (2022) held that this section has a wide ambit and covers all acts connected with proceeds of crime at any stage.

Section 4 – Punishment for Money Laundering

Rigorous imprisonment for a term of not less than 3 years but which may extend to 7 years, along with a fine. Where the proceeds arise from a scheduled offence under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS), the punishment may extend to 10 years.

Section 5 – Provisional Attachment of Property

The Director or any officer not below the rank of Deputy Director, if has reason to believe (recorded in writing) that any person has committed money laundering, may by order in writing provisionally attach property believed to be proceeds of crime. Such provisional attachment is valid for 180 days. The matter must be placed before the Adjudicating Authority within 30 days of attachment for confirmation.

Section 8 – Adjudication by the Adjudicating Authority

On receipt of a complaint from ED, the Adjudicating Authority issues a show-cause notice to the person whose property has been attached. After hearing both parties, the Authority passes an order either confirming the attachment and declaring the property forfeited to the Central Government, or releasing it. On conviction by the Special Court, all such attached properties stand confiscated under Section 8(6).

Section 17 – Search and Seizure of Premises

Empowers the ED to conduct searches of premises if it has reason to believe that any person has committed an act of money laundering or possesses proceeds of crime. A search warrant from the Adjudicating Authority is generally required; however, post the 2019 amendment, the ED can also search based on an order of the Director without a pre-existing FIR from police.

Section 18 – Search of Persons

Allows the ED to search any individual if there is reason to believe they are carrying proceeds of crime or any article related to a money laundering offence. The search must be conducted by an officer of the same gender as the person searched.

Section 19 – Power to Arrest (Detailed in Section 5 below)

Section 24 – Burden of Proof (Reverse Burden)

In any proceedings under PMLA, the burden of proving that proceeds of crime are untainted property lies on the accused. This is a statutory reverse burden of proof — a significant departure from the ordinary criminal law principle of “innocent until proven guilty.” The Supreme Court upheld this as constitutionally valid in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary (2022).

Section 44 – Special Courts

The Central Government designates one or more Sessions Courts as Special Courts for the purpose of trial of PMLA offences. The Special Court may also try the accused for the predicate (scheduled) offence in the same trial.

Section 45 – Bail Conditions (Detailed in Section 6 below)

Section 50 – Summons, Statements and Evidence

The ED has the powers of a Civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure to summon any person, enforce their attendance, examine them on oath, and require production of documents. Statements recorded under Section 50 are admissible as evidence in PMLA proceedings. The Supreme Court has consistently held that ED officers are not “police officers” under Article 20(3) of the Constitution, so such statements are not hit by the right against self-incrimination.

Section 63 – Penalties for Non-Compliance

Any person who wilfully fails to comply with summons, fails to produce documents, or makes false statements before the ED is liable for prosecution with imprisonment up to 2 years and/or fine.

Section 70 – Offences by Companies

Where an offence under PMLA is committed by a company, every person in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business of the company at the time of the offence shall be deemed guilty and liable for punishment. Directors, managers, secretaries, and officers can all be prosecuted.

Section 71 – PMLA Overrides Other Laws

The provisions of PMLA shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent contained in any other law for the time being in force. This gives PMLA primacy over CrPC, IPC, and other laws wherever there is a conflict.

૪. PMLA ની મુખ્ય કલમો – વિગતવાર વિશ્લેષણ

કલમ 3 – મની લોન્ડરિંગ ગુનો

ગુનામાંથી મળેલી સંપત્તિ (Proceeds of Crime) ને છુપાવવી, ધરાવવી, ઉપયોગ કરવો, અથવા “સ્વચ્છ” ધન તરીકે પ્રોજેક્ટ કરવું – આ તમામ મની લોન્ડરિંગ ગુનો છે. Vijay Madanlal Choudhary (2022)ના ચુકાદામાં સુપ્રીમ કોર્ટે આ કલમનો વ્યાપ ઘણો વ્યાપક ઠેરવ્યો છે.

કલમ 4 – સજા

3 થી 7 વર્ષ કઠોર કેદ + દંડ. NDPS ગુનાના Proceeds સાથે સંકળાયેલ હોય તો 10 વર્ષ સુધી.

કલમ 5 – Provisional Attachment

ED ડેપ્યુટી ડિરેક્ટર અને ઉપરના અધિકારી 180 દિવસ માટે Proceeds of Crime ની સંપત્તિ Provisionally Attach કરી શકે. 30 દિવસમાં Adjudicating Authority સમક્ષ Complaint ફાઇલ ફરજિયાત.

કલમ 17 – સર્ચ અને સીઝર

ED ને Permission (Warrant) સાથે કે 2019 Amendment બાદ Director ના Order થી FIR વગર પણ Search and Seizure ની સત્તા.

કલમ 24 – Reverse Burden of Proof

PMLA માં આરોપી ઉપર Burden of Proof છે – આરોપીએ સાબિત કરવું પડે છે કે Proceeds of Crime “untainted” (ગેરકાનૂની નહીં) છે. સામાન્ય ગુનેગારી કાયદાથી ઉલ્ટું.

કલમ 50 – Summons અને Statement

ED ને Civil Court ની સત્તા; Statement PMLA Proceedings માં Evidence તરીકે માન્ય. ED Officer “Police Officer” નથી, તેથી Article 20(3) (Self-incrimination) લાગુ નથી – Supreme Court દ્વારા ઠેરવ્યું.

5. Arrest under PMLA – Section 19

Section 19 of the PMLA confers the power of arrest on the Director, Deputy Director, Assistant Director, or any officer authorised by the Director. The conditions and procedure for arrest are as follows:

Precondition: The arresting officer must have reason to believe (not mere suspicion) that the person has been guilty of an offence under PMLA. This reason to believe must be recorded in writing before the arrest is made.

Communication of Grounds: The grounds of arrest must be informed to the accused person at the time of arrest. Failure to communicate grounds renders the arrest illegal (upheld in multiple High Court decisions).

Production before Court: The arrested person must be produced before the Special Court (PMLA Court) or, in its absence, before the nearest Judicial Magistrate within 24 hours of arrest, excluding the time necessary for the journey.

Right to Counsel: The arrested person has the right to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner of their choice.

Arrest Memo: An arrest memo must be prepared, attested by at least one witness, and the arrested person must countersign it.

No Warrant Required: Unlike CrPC, ED does not require a warrant from a Magistrate to arrest. The power is executive and administrative in nature.

ECIR Not to be Supplied: The Supreme Court in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary (2022) held that ECIR (Enforcement Case Information Report – ED’s equivalent of FIR) need not be supplied to the accused as a matter of right, unlike CrPC FIR.

Officers Empowered to Arrest under PMLA

૫. PMLA હેઠળ ધરપકડ – કલમ 19

PMLA ની કલમ 19 ED ના Director, Deputy Director, Assistant Director, અથવા Director દ્વારા અધિકૃત Officer ને ધરપકડ (Arrest) ની સત્તા આપે છે.

• પૂર્વ-શરત: Arrest Officer ને “Reason to Believe” (Writing માં) – માત્ર શંકા પૂરતી નથી.
• Grounds ની જાણ: ધરપકડ સમયે Grounds જણાવવા ફરજિયાત. ન જણાવ્યા = Arrest ગેરકાયદે.
• 24 કલાકમાં Court સમક્ષ: Special Court (PMLA Court) અથવા નજીકના Magistrate સમક્ષ.
• Warrant જરૂરી નથી.
• ECIR (PMLA FIR): ED ના ECIR ની Copy આરોપીને આપવી ફરજિયાત નથી – Supreme Court 2022.

6. Bail under PMLA – Section 45 (Twin Conditions)

Bail in PMLA cases is governed by Section 45, which imposes extremely stringent conditions — popularly known as the “Twin Conditions”. These conditions are over and above the general bail jurisprudence under the CrPC.

Twin Conditions (Section 45)

1. The Public Prosecutor must be given an opportunity to oppose the bail application; and
2. Where the Public Prosecutor opposes the bail, the court must be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty of the offence AND that the accused is not likely to commit any offence while on bail.

Both conditions must be fulfilled simultaneously. The burden is on the accused to satisfy the court of these conditions — a very high threshold in practice.

Anticipatory Bail under PMLA

The applicability of anticipatory bail (Section 438 CrPC) to PMLA cases was a debated issue. The Supreme Court has held that the twin conditions of Section 45 apply even to anticipatory bail applications in PMLA matters, making pre-arrest bail relief very difficult to obtain.

Exceptions to Twin Conditions

The twin conditions do NOT apply to:

• Persons under 16 years of age
• Women
• Sick or infirm persons

Courts may grant bail to these categories on more liberal grounds.

Remand and Custody in PMLA

Upon production before the Special Court after arrest, the ED may seek ED custody (remand) for the purpose of investigation — analogous to police remand in ordinary criminal cases. After the custody period, the accused may be sent to judicial custody (jail).

Default Bail under Section 167 CrPC in PMLA

If the ED fails to file a prosecution complaint (chargesheet) within 60 days (for offences punishable with up to 7 years) or 90 days (for offences punishable with more than 7 years) of arrest, the accused becomes entitled to default bail under the proviso to Section 167(2) CrPC, read with PMLA. The Supreme Court has affirmed this right.

૬. PMLA હેઠળ જામીન – કલમ 45 (Twin Conditions)

PMLA ની કલમ 45 “Twin Conditions” (બે-શરત) ધરાવે છે, જે સામાન્ય Bail Jurisprudence કરતા ઘણી કડક છે.

Twin Conditions (કલમ 45):

1. Public Prosecutor ને Bail Oppose કરવાની તક આપવી ફરજિયાત.
2. જ્યાં Public Prosecutor Oppose કરે, ત્યાં Court ને Reasonable Grounds દ્વારા Satisfaction થવી જોઈએ કે:
   • આરોપી ગુનેગાર નથી; અને
   • Bail ઉપર છૂટ્યા પછી ગુનો નહીં કરે.

Exceptions (Twin Conditions લાગુ નહીં): 16 વર્ષ નીચેના, મહિલા, અથવા ગંભીર બીમારીગ્રસ્ત વ્યક્તિ.

Default Bail: 60/90 દિવસમાં Prosecution Complaint ન ભરે, તો Default Bail (Section 167(2) CrPC) નો અધિકાર.

7. Court Jurisdiction and Authorities under PMLA

7.1 Special Court (Section 43 & 44)

The Central Government, in consultation with the Chief Justice of the concerned High Court, designates one or more Courts of Session as Special Courts for the purposes of trial of PMLA offences. The Special Court has exclusive jurisdiction to try:

• Offences of money laundering under Section 3
• The scheduled (predicate) offence in the same trial if the ED files a joint complaint

7.2 Adjudicating Authority (Section 6)

A quasi-judicial body constituted by the Central Government. It consists of a Chairperson (who is or has been a Member of the Indian Legal Service in Grade I post) and two other members. The Adjudicating Authority:

• Hears and decides complaints filed by ED regarding provisional attachment
• Passes orders confirming, modifying, or releasing the attachment
• On conviction by Special Court, confirms confiscation of property to the Central Government

7.3 Appellate Tribunal (Section 25)

The Appellate Tribunal for Money Laundering hears appeals against orders of the Adjudicating Authority. It is presided over by a sitting or retired Judge of a High Court. Appeals must be filed within 45 days of the Adjudicating Authority’s order (extendable for sufficient cause).

7.4 High Court (Section 42)

Appeals from orders of the Appellate Tribunal on questions of law lie before the High Court. Such appeals must be filed within 60 days of the Tribunal’s order. In criminal matters, appeals from the Special Court’s judgment lie before the High Court under general CrPC provisions. Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution is also frequently invoked in PMLA matters.

7.5 Supreme Court of India

The final appellate authority. Constitutional challenges to PMLA provisions, special leave petitions (Article 136), and important questions of law arising from High Court orders in PMLA matters are heard by the Supreme Court.

7.6 Financial Intelligence Unit – India (FIU-IND)

FIU-IND is the central national agency responsible for receiving, processing, analysing, and disseminating information relating to suspect financial transactions. It collects Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs), Cash Transaction Reports (CTRs), and Cross-Border Wire Transfer Reports from reporting entities (banks, NBFCs, etc.). FIU-IND shares financial intelligence with the ED for PMLA investigations.

૭. PMLA હેઠળ Court Jurisdiction અને Authorities

7.1 Special Court (કલમ 43 & 44)

Central Government, High Court ના Chief Justice ની Consultation થી, Sessions Court ને PMLA Trial માટે Special Court તરીકે Designate કરે છે. Special Court Exclusive Jurisdiction ધરાવે છે PMLA ગુના ટ્રાયલ માટે.

7.2 Adjudicating Authority (AA) (કલમ 6)

Quasi-Judicial Body – Central Government દ્વારા Constitute. ED ની Complaint ઉપર Hearing કરી Attachment ને Confirm, Modify અથવા Release કરવાનો Order.

7.3 Appellate Tribunal (AT) (કલમ 25)

AA ના Order સામે Appeal – 45 દિવસ – High Court ના Judge ની અધ્યક્ષ.

7.4 High Court (કલમ 42)

AT ના Order ઉપર Question of Law ઉઠાવી 60 દિવસમાં Appeal. Criminal Matter માં Special Court Judgment ઉપર CrPC-Appeal; Articles 226/227 Writ Petition.

7.5 Supreme Court

Final Appellate Authority – Article 136 SLP, Constitutional Challenges.

8. Investigation Officer Hierarchy and Powers under PMLA

Note: Officers of the Enforcement Directorate are not classified as “police officers” under the law. This has significant legal consequences: statements recorded by ED under Section 50 are admissible as evidence (unlike statements to police which are inadmissible under Section 25, Indian Evidence Act), and the rights under Article 20(3) of the Constitution regarding self-incrimination have a different application.

૮. PMLA હેઠળ Investigation Officer નો Hierarchy અને Authorities

• Director, ED: સર્વ સત્તા; Authorisation ની સત્તા
• Special Director / Additional Director / Joint Director: Arrest, Search, Attachment
• Deputy Director: Primary Investigation Officer – Arrest, Search, Provisional Attachment, Summons (સ્વ-સત્તા)
• Assistant Director: Search & Summons (સ્વ-સત્તા); Arrest/Attachment – Director ના Authorization થી

મહત્વની વાત: ED Officers “Police Officer” ગણાતા નથી. તેથી Section 50 Statement PMLA Proceedings માં Evidence તરીકે Admissible છે. Indian Evidence Act, Section 25 (Police Statement) લાગુ નથી.

9. Stages of a PMLA Case – From ECIR to Judgment

Stage 1 – Scheduled Offence / Predicate Crime

PMLA proceedings are triggered when a Scheduled Offence (listed in the Schedule to PMLA) is registered — typically an FIR with police, or a complaint before a Magistrate, or a departmental action. Without a scheduled offence, there is no basis for PMLA proceedings.

Stage 2 – Registration of ECIR (Enforcement Case Information Report)

The ED internally registers an ECIR, which is the ED’s equivalent of an FIR. The ECIR is not required to be shared with the accused (unlike a CrPC FIR). The ECIR sets out the preliminary facts and the basis for the ED’s investigation.

Stage 3 – Issuance of Summons under Section 50

The ED summons the accused, witnesses, and third parties (bankers, chartered accountants, company directors, etc.) for examination under Section 50. Statements are recorded on oath and are admissible as evidence.

Stage 4 – Search and Seizure (Sections 17 & 18)

The ED conducts searches of premises, residences, offices, and lockers. Documents, cash, jewelry, electronic devices, and other assets are seized. A panchnama (seizure memo) is prepared. Search of persons may also be conducted under Section 18.

Stage 5 – Provisional Attachment of Property (Section 5)

If the ED identifies property believed to be proceeds of crime, a provisional attachment order is issued. A complaint is filed before the Adjudicating Authority within 30 days for confirmation of the attachment.

Stage 6 – Proceedings before Adjudicating Authority (Section 8)

The Adjudicating Authority hears the ED’s complaint and the affected person’s reply. After hearing both sides, the AA either confirms the attachment (declares property forfeited) or releases it. The accused may challenge the AA’s order before the Appellate Tribunal.

Stage 7 – Arrest (Section 19) [if applicable]

If the evidence is sufficient and the ED believes the person is guilty, an arrest is made. The arrested person is produced before the Special Court within 24 hours. Bail is applied for, and the court applies the Section 45 twin conditions.

Stage 8 – Filing of Prosecution Complaint before Special Court

The ED files a prosecution complaint (equivalent to a chargesheet in CrPC cases) before the designated Special Court. This is a separate proceeding from the AA complaint. The Special Court takes cognizance of the offence.

Stage 9 – Framing of Charges

The Special Court hears arguments on charge, examines the material, and either frames charges against the accused or discharges them. An application for discharge under Section 227 CrPC may be filed at this stage.

Stage 10 – Trial: Prosecution Evidence

The ED presents its witnesses and documentary evidence. The accused may cross-examine the prosecution witnesses. Statements under Section 50 form a critical part of the prosecution evidence. The reverse burden under Section 24 of PMLA applies.

Stage 11 – Defense Evidence and Final Arguments

The accused presents defense witnesses and documentary evidence. Both parties address the Special Court on facts and law. The court hears final arguments including on quantum of sentence.

Stage 12 – Judgment, Sentence, and Confiscation

The Special Court pronounces judgment. On conviction: rigorous imprisonment of 3–7 years (or up to 10 years for NDPS-related laundering) + fine + final confiscation of all attached property to the Central Government (Section 8(6)). On acquittal: the attached property is released and restored to the accused. Appeals lie to the High Court and Supreme Court.

૯. PMLA Case ના Stages – ECIR થી Judgment સુધી

1. Scheduled Offence (FIR / Predicate Crime) – PMLA ની Trigger
2. ECIR Registration – ED ની Internal “FIR” (Accused ને Copy જરૂરી નથી)
3. Section 50 Summons – Statement Recording, Documents Collection
4. Search & Seizure (Section 17/18) – Premises, Persons, Electronic Devices
5. Provisional Attachment (Section 5) – 180 Days; AA ને 30 Days Complaint
6. Adjudicating Authority Hearing (Section 8) – Confirm / Release Attachment
7. Arrest (Section 19) – 24 Hours Court Production; Section 45 Bail Conditions
8. Prosecution Complaint (Special Court) – Cognizance
9. Charge Framing / Discharge Application
10. Prosecution Evidence (Section 24 – Reverse Burden)
11. Defense Evidence & Final Arguments
12. Judgment: Conviction = 3-7 Years + Fine + Confiscation; Acquittal = Property Release

10. Landmark Judgments under PMLA – Key Supreme Court & High Court Decisions

1. Vijay Madanlal Choudhary v. Union of India (2022) – Supreme Court

The most comprehensive PMLA judgment by the Supreme Court (3-judge bench), which upheld almost the entire PMLA regime. Key holdings:

• ED’s powers of arrest, search, seizure, and attachment under PMLA are constitutionally valid
• The Twin Conditions for bail under Section 45 are constitutionally valid and must be followed strictly
• ECIR (ED’s internal document) need not be supplied to the accused as a matter of right
• Statements recorded under Section 50 by ED officers are admissible — ED officers are not police officers
• The reverse burden of proof under Section 24 is constitutionally valid
• The definition of “Proceeds of Crime” is wide and covers property derived at any stage from a scheduled offence
• PMLA proceedings can continue independently even if the scheduled offence is compounded or the accused is acquitted in the scheduled offence (subject to the specific facts)

2. Nikesh Tarachand Shah v. Union of India (2017) – Supreme Court

The Supreme Court struck down Section 45’s twin conditions as unconstitutional on the ground that they were arbitrary and violated Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty). However, this judgment was effectively reversed by the Parliament through an amendment, and further confirmed by Vijay Madanlal Choudhary (2022), which revived the twin conditions.

3. Gautam Kundu v. Directorate of Enforcement (2015) – Supreme Court

Held that the ED does not require a police FIR to register an ECIR and commence PMLA investigations. The ED’s power is independent of the police investigation into the scheduled offence. This judgment was further strengthened by the 2019 PMLA amendment.

4. P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement (2019) – Supreme Court

Dealt with anticipatory bail in PMLA cases. The Court held that anticipatory bail is not a matter of right in PMLA cases and the twin conditions under Section 45 apply with full force to anticipatory bail applications as well. Economic offences involving large-scale money laundering must be viewed seriously.

5. Rohit Tandon v. Directorate of Enforcement (2018) – Supreme Court

Affirmed that Section 45 twin conditions are mandatory and that courts cannot bypass them while granting bail in PMLA cases. The Court emphasized that money laundering is a grave socio-economic offence.

6. Rajbhushan Omprakash Dixit Case – High Court

The High Court upheld that attachment of property under Section 5 can be made even before the completion of the investigation of the predicate (scheduled) offence. The attachment is justified as a preventive measure to preserve the proceeds of crime.

7. Saumya Chaurasiya v. Directorate of Enforcement (2021) – Supreme Court

The Court reiterated that the twin conditions under Section 45 are stringent and must be strictly applied. The accused bears the burden to demonstrate reasonable grounds for believing they are not guilty, and the court must record satisfaction, not merely a prima facie observation.

8. Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of Enforcement (2023 & 2024) – Supreme Court

In a series of orders, the Supreme Court grappled with the right to speedy trial vs. the stringent bail conditions under Section 45. The Court ultimately held that prolonged incarceration without trial completion, in certain circumstances, can itself be a ground to grant bail, balancing Article 21 rights with the stringency of PMLA bail provisions. This judgment is considered a significant tempering of the rigidity of Section 45 twin conditions.

9. V.K. Sasikala v. Union of India – High Court / Supreme Court

Established that a person can be prosecuted under PMLA even if the predicate offence was committed by a third party, as long as the accused is connected with the proceeds of such offence.

10. State of Gujarat v. Various Accused (PMLA Cases, Gujarat High Court)

The Gujarat High Court has repeatedly held in various PMLA matters that the right to bail under Article 21 cannot be completely negated by Section 45 where the trial is unduly delayed. Courts have also held that the High Court’s writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not ousted in cases of illegal arrest or procedural violation by the ED.

૧૦. PMLA ના Landmark Judgments

1. Vijay Madanlal Choudhary v. Union of India (2022) – Supreme Court

PMLA ના Regime ને Uphold કર્યો. ED Powers, Section 45 Twin Conditions, Section 50 Statement Admissibility, Section 24 Reverse Burden – બધુ Constitutional ઠેરવ્યું. ECIR ની Copy Accused ને આપવી ફરજિયાત નથી.

2. Nikesh Tarachand Shah v. Union of India (2017)

Section 45 Twin Conditions ને Unconstitutional ઠેરવ્યા – પરંતુ Parliament Amendment અને 2022 ના Vijay Madanlal Judgment થી Reversed.

3. Gautam Kundu v. Directorate of Enforcement (2015)

ED ને ECIR Register કરવા Police FIR ફરજિયાત નથી.

4. P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement (2019)

Anticipatory Bail – Section 45 Twin Conditions ફૂલ ફોર્સ થી લાગુ. Economic Offences ગંભીર.

5. Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of Enforcement (2023-24)

Prolonged Incarceration without Trial Completion – Under specific circumstances – Bail Grant; Article 21 vs Section 45 Balance.

11. Remedies Available to an Accused under PMLA

• Anticipatory Bail – Section 438 CrPC (subject to Section 45 twin conditions)
• Regular Bail after Arrest – Before the Special Court, subject to twin conditions
• Default Bail – If ED fails to file prosecution complaint within 60/90 days of arrest
• Discharge Application – Before Special Court under Section 227 CrPC
• Challenge to Provisional Attachment – Before the Adjudicating Authority
• Appeal to Appellate Tribunal – Against AA’s order within 45 days
• Appeal to High Court – Under Section 42 against Appellate Tribunal’s order within 60 days
• Writ Petition (Article 226/227) – Before High Court challenging illegal arrest, illegal search, violation of procedure
• Special Leave Petition (Article 136) – Before Supreme Court against High Court orders
• Quashing of ECIR/Proceedings – In exceptional cases of abuse of process
• Appeal against Conviction – Before High Court and Supreme Court

૧૧. PMLA માં આરોપીને ઉપલબ્ધ ઉપાય

• Anticipatory Bail (Section 438 CrPC + Section 45 PMLA)
• Regular Bail (Special Court – Section 45 Twin Conditions)
• Default Bail (60/90 Days – Prosecution Complaint ન ભરે)
• Discharge Application (Section 227 CrPC – Special Court)
• Adjudicating Authority – Attachment Challenge
• Appellate Tribunal – 45 Days Appeal
• High Court – Section 42 Appeal / Article 226/227 Writ
• Supreme Court – Article 136 SLP
• ECIR Quashing (Abuse of Process)
• Appeal Against Conviction – High Court / Supreme Court

12. Types of Cases under PMLA

• Corruption and Bribery: Politicians, public servants, and businessmen who receive illegal gratification often launder the proceeds through real estate, shell companies, and hawala networks.
• Drug Trafficking (NDPS): Profits from narcotics trade are laundered through cash-intensive businesses. NDPS scheduled offences attract up to 10 years imprisonment under PMLA.
• Banking and Financial Fraud: Non-performing assets (NPAs), loan fraud, bank scams involving proceeds being laundered through multiple layers of companies and accounts.
• Cybercrime and Online Fraud: Proceeds of online financial fraud, phishing, and cyber theft are increasingly being prosecuted under PMLA.
• Real Estate Fraud: Benami property transactions and illegal land deals where proceeds are disguised through property purchases.
• GST and Tax Fraud: ITC (Input Tax Credit) fraud and tax evasion proceeds laundered through shell companies.
• Terrorist Financing: Funds channelled to terrorist organisations through hawala, cryptocurrency, or NGO misuse.
• Organised Crime and Extortion: Proceeds of extortion, kidnapping, and organised crime laundered through legitimate businesses.
• Wildlife and Forest Offences: Proceeds from illegal wildlife trade and forest products are scheduled offences under PMLA.
• Cryptocurrency-related Laundering: An emerging area where crypto assets are used to layer and integrate proceeds of crime.

૧૨. PMLA હેઠળ Case ના પ્રકારો

• Corruption / Bribery (ભ્રષ્ટાચાર)
• Drug Trafficking / NDPS (ડ્રગ વ્યાપાર)
• Banking & Financial Fraud (NPA, Loan Fraud)
• Cybercrime / Online Fraud
• Real Estate / Benami Property Fraud
• GST / Tax Evasion (ITC Fraud)
• Terrorist Financing
• Organised Crime / Extortion
• Wildlife / Forest Offences
• Cryptocurrency Laundering (નવો ક્ષેત્ર)

13. PMLA Cases Lawyer in Ahmedabad, Gujarat – Advocate Paresh M Modi

If you or your family member is facing an Enforcement Directorate (ED) investigation, a PMLA summons, provisional attachment of property, arrest, or trial before a Special Court, you need an experienced and specialist PMLA lawyer to protect your rights and interests.

Advocate Paresh M. Modi, based in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, is a leading criminal and PMLA defence lawyer with extensive experience in:

• Challenging provisional attachment orders before the Adjudicating Authority
• Filing and arguing anticipatory bail and regular bail applications under PMLA Section 45
• Representing clients in PMLA Special Court trials
• Filing appeals before the Appellate Tribunal and the High Court of Gujarat
• Writ petitions under Articles 226/227 challenging illegal ED arrests and searches
• Discharge applications, FIR quashing, and ECIR quashing petitions
• Advising corporate clients and directors on PMLA compliance and risk mitigation
• Handling cheque return cases (NI Act Section 138), anticipatory bail, and criminal appeals across Gujarat courts

૧૩. PMLA Case ના વકીલ, અમદાવાદ, ગુજરાત – એડ. પરેશ એમ. મોદી

જો તમે અથવા તમારા પરિવારના સભ્ય ED (Enforcement Directorate) ના PMLA Summons, Attachment, Arrest, અથવા Special Court Trial નો સામનો કરી રહ્યા છો, તો Advocate Paresh M. Modi – અનુભવી PMLA ડિફેન્સ Lawyer – તમારી મદદ કરી શકે છે.

• Provisional Attachment ને Adjudicating Authority સમક્ષ Challenge
• Section 45 – Anticipatory Bail / Regular Bail Application
• PMLA Special Court Trial Representation
• Appellate Tribunal, Gujarat High Court Appeal
• Articles 226/227 – Writ Petition (Illegal Arrest / Search)
• Discharge Application, FIR Quashing, ECIR Quashing
• Corporate Clients – PMLA Compliance Advisory

14. Contact – PMLA Lawyer Ahmedabad | Advocate Paresh M Modi

Advocate Paresh M. Modi
Specialist in PMLA, Criminal Law, Anticipatory Bail, FIR Quashing, Cheque Return Cases (NI Act 138), High Court Appeals

Mobile / WhatsApp: +91 99250 02031
Office Landline: +91-79-48001468
Email: advocatepmmodi@gmail.com
Website: www.advocatepmmodi.in

Office Address:
Office No. C/112, Supath-2 Complex,
Opp. Kohinoor Plaza Hotel,
Near Old Wadaj Bus Stand, Ashram Road,
Ahmedabad – 380013, Gujarat, India.

Available for consultations at Ahmedabad office. Also appearing before High Court of Gujarat, Rajkot, Surat, Vadodara Sessions Courts, and PMLA Special Courts across Gujarat.

Legal Words and Definitions

Lawyer

A professional legally qualified to advise clients and represent them before courts or legal authorities.

Advocate

A person enrolled under the Advocates Act, 1961, authorized to practice law and plead cases before courts in India.

Vakil

A traditional Indian term meaning lawyer or advocate who represents parties in legal matters.

Attorney

A legal representative or agent empowered to act for another in legal or business transactions.

Barrister

A lawyer trained in advocacy, typically practicing in higher courts, especially in the UK-style legal system.

Solicitor

A legal practitioner who advises clients, prepares legal documents, and may brief barristers for court appearances.

Lawyers

Lawyers are legal professionals who are qualified to practice law and provide legal assistance. They represent clients in court, prepare legal documents, and offer advice on legal matters. Lawyers specialize in various areas such as criminal law, civil law, property law, family law, and corporate law, ensuring that clients receive the best possible solutions tailored to their legal concerns.

Advocates

Advocates are a subset of lawyers who are specifically authorized to represent clients in court and plead on their behalf. They play a critical role in the judicial system by presenting cases, cross-examining witnesses, and interpreting laws to secure justice for their clients. Advocate Paresh M Modi, based in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, is one such experienced and reputed advocate known for his expertise in criminal, civil, and family matters.

Law Firms

Law firms are professional organizations comprising multiple lawyers and legal consultants who collaborate to provide comprehensive legal services. These firms cater to various legal needs, including litigation, corporate advisory, contract drafting, and dispute resolution. Advocate Paresh M Modi leads a distinguished law firm in Ahmedabad, offering solutions across diverse legal domains with a team of dedicated and experienced advocates.

Law Consultant

A law consultant is an experienced legal professional offering expert guidance on legal matters without necessarily representing clients in court. They assist individuals, businesses, and organizations in navigating complex legal frameworks by providing tailored advice and preventive legal strategies. Advocate Paresh M Modi, known for his profound legal knowledge, offers exceptional consultancy services to ensure clients’ compliance with legal regulations and mitigate risks.

Legal Services

Legal services encompass a wide range of professional assistance provided by lawyers, advocates, and law firms. These include legal advice, drafting legal documents, representing clients in court, negotiating settlements, and ensuring compliance with applicable laws. Advocate Paresh M Modi excels in offering top-notch legal services in Gujarat, addressing criminal cases, property disputes, divorce matters, and more.

Legal Advisor

A legal advisor is a professional who offers strategic legal guidance to individuals or organizations to ensure compliance with laws and regulations. They specialize in interpreting laws, drafting agreements, and providing insights to minimize risks and resolve disputes effectively. Advocate Paresh M Modi serves as a trusted legal advisor, helping clients achieve favorable outcomes in complex legal scenarios.

Law Firm

An organization of lawyers providing legal services, advice, and representation to individuals and businesses.

Best

The “Best” signifies unparalleled quality and performance. It represents the highest standard in a field, offering reliability, trust, and exceptional outcomes, ensuring client satisfaction through consistent excellence.

Top

“Top” defines the pinnacle of achievement or ranking in a profession. It emphasizes leadership, authority, and superior expertise, ensuring outstanding results that surpass expectations.

Expert

An “Expert” is a highly skilled and knowledgeable professional with years of experience in a specific field. They provide dependable advice and solutions tailored to meet complex requirements.

Specialist

A “Specialist” focuses on a specific domain, offering in-depth understanding and dedicated service. Their proficiency ensures precise, efficient, and effective solutions for specialized needs.

Near Me

Near Me is a phrase frequently used in searches to find nearby services, such as lawyers, courts, or legal assistance within a user’s location.

Type of Offenses and Crime

Murder

The unlawful killing of another person with intent. It is one of the most serious crimes and is punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Arson

The criminal act of deliberately setting property on fire. This crime is addressed under Section 435 and 436 of the IPC.

Assault

An intentional act causing physical harm or the threat of physical harm to another person. Sections 351 to 358 of the IPC deal with assault-related offenses.

Burglary

The illegal entry into a building or premises with the intent to commit a crime, typically theft. It is punishable under Sections 445 and 446 of the IPC.

Domestic Violence

Abuse or violence inflicted by a family member, typically within a household, often targeting women. The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 governs such cases.

Fraud

Deceptive practices or dishonest acts intended to secure financial or personal gain. It is addressed under Section 420 of the IPC and other laws.

Kidnapping

The unlawful taking or confinement of a person against their will, often for ransom. Sections 359 to 374 of the IPC cover kidnapping and abduction.

Organized Crime

Criminal activities coordinated by a group of individuals or a criminal syndicate, such as smuggling or drug trafficking. Organized crimes are addressed by special laws like MCOCA (Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act).

White Collar Crimes

Non-violent crimes committed for financial gain, often by professionals or businesses, such as embezzlement, insider trading, and money laundering.

Cybercrime

Illegal activities conducted online or using digital technology, such as hacking, phishing, or identity theft. The Information Technology Act, 2000 governs such offenses.

Robbery

The use of force or intimidation to unlawfully take someone’s property. Sections 390 to 402 of the IPC deal with robbery.

Human Trafficking

The illegal trade or exploitation of individuals, typically for forced labor or sexual exploitation. This crime is governed by Sections 370 and 371 of the IPC and other laws.

Sexual Offenses

Crimes such as rape, sexual harassment, and molestation. These offenses are covered under Sections 375 to 376D of the IPC and the POCSO Act for child victims.

Extortion

Obtaining money, property, or services through coercion, threats, or force. It is punishable under Sections 383 to 389 of the IPC.

Corruption

Abuse of power or position for personal gain, often involving bribery or misuse of public office. The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 deals with such crimes.

Financial Fraud

Focused on resolving financial fraud cases, providing meticulous analysis, strategic planning, and robust representation to protect interests and ensure justice.

Ponzi Scheme Fraud

“With deep expertise in Ponzi scheme fraud cases, handling victim representation, litigation, and legal remedies with precision and dedication.

Rape

A criminal act involving sexual intercourse without consent, punishable under Indian law for violating personal dignity and bodily autonomy.

Gang

A group of persons acting together, often associated with organized criminal or unlawful activities.

Loot

The unlawful taking of money or property by force or during violence, riot, or warlike situations.

Dhaad

A Gujarati term commonly used to describe robbery or sudden violent attack to snatch property or money.

Jaamin

A Gujarati word meaning security or surety given to release an accused person temporarily from custody.

Bail

A legal process that allows an accused to be released from custody while ensuring their appearance before the court.

Jamanat

The Hindi and Gujarati term for bail, referring to temporary release on surety or bond pending trial.

Jail

A place where accused or convicted persons are lawfully confined by the government authorities.

Drugs

Chemical substances that affect the body or mind; illegal drugs are controlled under the NDPS Act for misuse and trafficking.

NDPS

The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — a central law regulating and prohibiting drug abuse and trafficking in India.

GUJCTOC

The Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Act, enacted to curb organized crime, terrorism, and criminal syndicates in Gujarat.

FEMA

The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, governing foreign exchange transactions, cross-border trade, and currency violations in India.

PASA

The Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 (Gujarat), allowing preventive detention of habitual offenders and antisocial elements.

POCSO

The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, a special law ensuring protection of minors from sexual assault and exploitation.

Theft

The dishonest taking of another person’s movable property with intent to deprive them permanently of it.

FIR

First Information Report — the initial complaint or report registered by police upon receiving information of a cognizable offence.

Quashing

A judicial process by which a High Court cancels or nullifies criminal proceedings or an FIR if found illegal or unjust.

ACB

Anti-Corruption Bureau, a government agency investigating bribery, corruption, and misconduct by public servants.

CBI

Central Bureau of Investigation, India’s premier central agency for investigating serious crimes, corruption, and economic offences.

CID

Criminal Investigation Department, a state-level police branch specializing in criminal investigations and evidence gathering.

NIA

National Investigation Agency, India’s central counter-terrorism agency handling terrorism-related and national security cases.

DRI

Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, the apex intelligence agency for enforcing customs and anti-smuggling laws in India.

ED

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) is a law enforcement agency in India responsible for enforcing economic laws and combating financial crimes, such as money laundering.

CVC

The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) is an autonomous body in India aimed at preventing corruption in government institutions and maintaining integrity in public administration.

Crime Branch

The Crime Branch is a specialized wing of the State Police Department responsible for investigating serious crimes such as murder, kidnapping, cyber fraud, and organized crime. It functions under the supervision of senior police officers.

LCB (Local Crime Branch)

LCB stands for Local Crime Branch. It operates within the district-level police department and investigates serious local criminal offenses, including fraud, theft, and property-related crimes.

Offense

An offense is an act or omission that violates the law and is punishable under various Indian Penal Laws such as the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (replacing IPC). Offenses are categorized as cognizable or non-cognizable, bailable or non-bailable.

Economic Offense

Economic offenses are crimes involving financial fraud or economic manipulation that harm the financial stability of individuals or the nation. Examples include money laundering, bank fraud, tax evasion, and corporate frauds. Such cases are often investigated by agencies like the ED, CBI, or EOW.

SOG (Special Operations Group)

The Special Operations Group is a specialized police unit in many Indian states, including Gujarat. It handles sensitive and high-profile criminal cases, organized crime, terrorism-related investigations, and cybercrime operations.

NIA (National Investigation Agency)

The National Investigation Agency is India’s premier counter-terrorism and national security investigative agency. It handles cases related to terrorism, explosives, cross-border crimes, and offenses under special acts like the UAPA.

PMLA (Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002)

The PMLA is a central legislation enacted to prevent money laundering and confiscate property derived from such offenses. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) investigates cases under this Act, and offenses are adjudicated by the PMLA Appellate Tribunal and courts.

Economic Offences Wing (EOW) Act

The Economic Offences Wing (EOW) is a specialized division within various law enforcement agencies in India, tasked with investigating and combating economic crimes such as fraud, money laundering, tax evasion, and other financial malpractices. It plays a pivotal role in maintaining financial integrity and ensuring that white-collar crimes do not go unchecked. This detailed explanation will cover the Economic Offences Wing Act, the organizational structure and work style, procedural stages, types of cases handled, and relevant sections of the EOW Act. We will also touch on the prominent role played by advocate Paresh M Modi, who has become well-known for his work on EOW cases.

Cyber Crime

Criminal activity involving computers, networks, or digital devices — including hacking, online fraud, and data theft.

Amdavad

Commonly known as Ahmedabad, it is the largest city in Gujarat, India, known for its rich cultural heritage, legal institutions, business centers, and the Gujarat High Court.

Gujarat

Gujarat, a western Indian state, boasts a robust judicial system with high courts, district courts, and tribunals addressing diverse cases.

Bharat

The traditional and constitutional name of India, representing the Republic of India, a sovereign democratic nation with diverse cultures, languages, and a strong legal and constitutional framework.

India

India, a democratic nation, has a comprehensive judiciary comprising Supreme Court, High Courts, and subordinate courts ensuring justice nationwide.

Indian Lawyers

Indian lawyers play a crucial role in upholding the Constitution and addressing legal disputes at various judicial levels.

Chief Additional Metropolitan Court

These courts in metropolitan cities manage serious criminal and civil cases requiring swift legal action.

District Court

District courts form the backbone of the judiciary, handling civil and criminal cases within their jurisdiction.

Sessions Court

Sessions courts are designated for serious criminal matters, ensuring justice through fair trials and judgments.

High Court

High Courts, at the state level, have jurisdiction over appeals and constitutional matters, ensuring justice across states.

Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court is the highest court of the State of Gujarat, with its principal seat at Sola, Ahmedabad. It was established on 1 May 1960 under the Bombay Reorganization Act, 1960, when Gujarat was carved out of the erstwhile Bombay State. It exercises jurisdiction over all civil, criminal, constitutional and administrative matters arising within Gujarat, and has supervisory powers over all subordinate courts in the state under the Constitution of India.

Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of India is the apex judicial authority, ensuring constitutional justice and uniformity across the nation.

Contact Advocate Paresh M Modi

Mobile: +91 9925002031 (Only WhatsApp sms – Timing 9 am to 9 pm)
Office Landline: +91-79-48001468 (For  Appointment Only – Timing 10.30 am to 6.30 pm – On Working Days)
Email: advocatepmmodi@gmail.com
Website: www.advocatepmmodi.in
Office Address:
Office No. C/112, Supath-2 Complex, Opp. Kohinoor Plaza Hotel, Near Old Wadaj Bus Stand, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad – 380013, Gujarat, India.