Bail Lawyer for Liquor Case in Gujarat – Advocate Paresh M Modi (Ahmedabad)
Gujarat enforces one of India’s strictest prohibition regimes. A “liquor case” is not limited to drinking; it commonly involves possession, transportation, sale, purchase, import/export, stocking, or facilitation of prohibited intoxicants. In practice, even a single vehicle interception or a “party raid” can trigger multiple sections of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, along with allied offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 (where allegations of forgery, fake number plates, conspiracy, etc. are added).
Advocate Paresh M Modi (Ahmedabad, Gujarat) handles regular bail, anticipatory bail, default bail, quashing, discharge, and defence strategy in liquor/prohibition matters—particularly where the case is inflated by clubbing of sections, alleged “commercial quantity,” repeated remand, or vehicle confiscation complications.
Advocate Paresh M Modi – High Court Advocate for Bail in Liquor & Prohibition Act Cases in Gujarat
Advocate Paresh M Modi is a leading High Court Advocate for bail in liquor case in Gujarat, widely trusted for handling complex Prohibition Act offences, liquor FIR quashing, anticipatory bail, and regular bail matters before the Gujarat High Court, Sessions Courts and District Courts. He is recognized as the best High Court advocate for liquor bail in Gujarat, providing immediate legal protection to accused persons facing arrest in liquor transport, liquor possession, bootlegging, party raid, illegal liquor sale, and vehicle seizure cases.
As a seasoned Prohibition Act bail lawyer in Ahmedabad, Advocate Modi delivers result-oriented defence in cases involving liquor smuggling, import-export violations, confiscation of vehicles, FIR cancellation, and stay proceedings. His legal strategies focus on conscious possession defence, illegal seizure challenges, sampling irregularities, quantity calculation disputes, and misuse of Sections 65, 66, 81, 83, 98(2) and 116B of the Gujarat Prohibition Act.
Clients searching for a High Court liquor bail lawyer near me in Ahmedabad, a High Court advocate for liquor FIR quashing Gujarat, or a High Court bail lawyer for prohibition cases rely on Advocate Paresh M Modi for urgent bail, stay, discharge and vehicle release reliefs. He has successfully represented numerous accused persons in liquor offence bail matters, ensuring protection from custodial harassment and speedy judicial relief.
With focused practice in Gujarat prohibition litigation, Advocate Modi stands as the most reliable High Court advocate for liquor arrest bail, liquor seizure bail, and vehicle confiscation defence in Gujarat.
Key Gujarat Prohibition Law Framework
While each FIR is fact-specific, Gujarat Police typically invokes combinations of the following:
1) Core offence section – Section 65 (including 65(e))
Section 65 broadly penalizes illegal import/export/manufacture/bottling/possession/transport/sale/purchase of intoxicants in contravention of the Act, rules, or permit regime.
2) “Drunk condition / consumption” style provisions – Section 66
Section 66 is often used when a person is alleged to have consumed liquor outside Gujarat and entered Gujarat in intoxicated condition, or allied variants depending on the factual matrix and amendments.
3) Confiscation / muddamal vehicle – Section 98(2)
This is the most litigated provision for liquor cases because it impacts vehicle release and “muddamal custody”:
- Section 98(2) makes conveyances used to carry intoxicants liable to confiscation, and historically created an embargo on interim release when seized quantity exceeded the “prescribed quantity.”
- Gujarat has prescribed the relevant “quantity” as 20 litres via Home Department notification dated 2 July 2019 (amending the 2012 Rules).
- In 2024, Gujarat amended Section 98(2) to enable auction of confiscated vehicles before final judgment (subject to prescribed manner and court permission), reflecting the State’s policy to prevent deterioration and recurring misuse.
4) Typical “package” sections in FIRs (81 / 83 / 116B etc.)
FIRs frequently add Section 81, Section 83, Section 116B (often reflecting additional allegations such as facilitation/abetment/attempt/connected contraventions—depending on the police narrative and the case type). You will see these combined routinely in bail orders and FIR recitals.
Quantity Details That Matter in Gujarat Liquor Matters (Bail + Seizure)
- A) The “20 litres” threshold: what it actually affects
The 20-litre prescribed quantity is not a universal “bail eligibility” cut-off. In practice, it most directly impacts:
- Vehicle / conveyance release under Section 98(2) (muddamal custody and confiscation consequences).
- The State’s argument that a case is serious / organised / commercial and therefore bail should be opposed more strongly—particularly where bottles/cases indicate distribution intent.
- B) How police measure “quantity”
Quantity is commonly computed in:
- Litres (for bulk transport or large consignments), or
- Bottle/can counts converted into litres during panchnama and sampling.
The 2012 sampling/quantity determination framework (and its amendment to 20 litres) is repeatedly referenced in Gujarat litigation around seizure and interim custody.
Types of Bail in Prohibition Matters
Depending on stage and custody status, defence typically proceeds via:
- Anticipatory Bail (pre-arrest)
Where there is risk of arrest based on FIR naming, CDR location theory, co-accused statement, ownership of vehicle, or “supplier chain” allegation. - Regular Bail (post-arrest)
Once remand ends or investigation stabilises, emphasis shifts to role, recovery attribution, antecedents, triability, and proportional custody. - Default Bail
Where the prosecution fails to complete investigation/charge-sheet within statutory timelines—this is highly fact-specific and procedural.
Recent Gujarat orders explicitly reflect BNSS as the bail procedure statute in 2024–2025 matters.
Defence Strategy for the Accused
Below are the most effective defence “tracks” used in Gujarat liquor cases. A well-built bail file typically uses several together.
1) No “conscious possession” / no nexus to contraband
A recurring winning theme is: the accused is not the possessor/owner/handler and there is no credible evidence of conscious possession.
- Example: Gujarat High Court orders commonly record defence that the accused is roped in only on co-accused statement, with no recovery from him and no conscious possession.
2) Role differentiation (driver vs passenger vs owner vs alleged supplier)
Courts frequently differentiate:
- Mere presence,
- Minor crew/assistant role,
- Ownership without knowledge,
- Alleged supplier/financier.
A 2025 Gujarat High Court bail order, for instance, notes that no specific role is attributed beyond presence/crew status, along with no antecedents and custody duration—granting bail.
3) Antecedents and “repeat offender” narrative
Gujarat prosecution heavily argues deterrence. Defence counters with:
- Clean antecedents,
- Stable residence/occupation,
- Low flight risk,
- Willingness to cooperate and comply with conditions.
4) Procedural and evidentiary vulnerabilities
A strong prohibition defence scrutinises:
- Panchnama integrity and independent panch witnesses,
- Sampling compliance and chain-of-custody,
- Whether quantity calculation is reliable,
- Whether “permit/pass” aspects were properly verified,
- For vehicle cases: whether confiscation steps were initiated as required.
5) “Triable by Magistrate” and proportional custody argument
In many prohibition cases (especially party/possession matters), courts consider prolonged custody disproportionate where trial is not imminent.
6) Medical/permit exceptions (where applicable)
For certain classes (permit holders, medical prescriptions, authorised possession), defence focuses on:
- Documentary proof,
- Licensing/permit regime compliance,
- Lack of mens rea.
Favourable Judgments and Practical Bail Reasoning (What Helps the Accused)
Because liquor cases are fact-driven, “favourable” rulings are best used for principles:
1) Gujarat High Court: Regular bail granted in Prohibition Act combinations
Gujarat High Court orders show routine grant of bail where the court is satisfied on role/antecedents/conditions—e.g., offences under Sections 65(a)(e), 98(2), 81, 116B.
Another example shows the standard FIR bundle (65(a), 65(e), 81, 83, 98(2), 116(b)) being considered in regular bail proceedings.
2) Gujarat High Court: BNSS-era bail
Courts have already begun referencing BNSS provisions while granting bail in liquor transportation networks (e.g., Daman-to-Gujarat movement allegations), relying on general bail jurisprudence and proportionality.
3) Supreme Court / vehicle release context under Section 98(2)
While this is more about muddamal/vehicle custody than bail, it is crucial in liquor defence practice because vehicle seizure is often used as leverage. The Supreme Court notes the statutory embargo where seized quantity exceeds the prescribed threshold (20 litres as per the 02.07.2019 notification), and emphasises proper procedural route and statutory scheme.
Why a Specialist Bail Lawyer Matters in Gujarat Prohibition Cases
Liquor FIRs in Gujarat are frequently “section-heavy,” and outcomes turn on:
- How the role is framed (principal vs peripheral),
- Whether the case is treated as consumption/party vs transport/supply chain,
- Whether the court is shown clear compliance, cooperation, and low-risk profile,
- Whether seizure/quantity issues are technically challenged.
A specialist bail practice also coordinates:
- Prompt remand opposition,
- Early regular bail filing,
- Vehicle release strategy (where maintainable), and
- Post-charge-sheet bail improvements.
Contact – Advocate Paresh M Modi (Ahmedabad, Gujarat)
Mobile (WhatsApp message only): +91 9925002031 (9 AM to 9 PM)
Office Landline: +91-79-48001468 (10:30 AM to 6:30 PM, working days)
Email: advocatepmmodi@gmail.com
Website: www.advocatepmmodi.in
Office: Office No. C/112, Supath-2 Complex, Opp. Kohinoor Plaza Hotel, Near Old Wadaj Bus Stand, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad – 380013, Gujarat (visit after calling)
ગુજરાતમાં દારૂના કેસ માટે શ્રેષ્ઠ બેઈલ (જામીન) વકીલ – એડવોકેટ પરેશ એમ મોદી (અમદાવાદ)
ગુજરાત રાજ્યમાં દારૂબંધી કાયદો (Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949) ભારતનો સૌથી કડક કાયદો માનવામાં આવે છે. અહીં માત્ર દારૂ પીવાનું જ નહીં પરંતુ:
- દારૂ રાખવો
• દારૂ લાવવો–લે જવો
• દારૂ વેચવો–ખરીદવો
• દારૂનો જથ્થો સંગ્રહ કરવો
• વાહનમાં દારૂ લઈ જવો
• અન્ય રાજ્યમાંથી દારૂ લાવવો
આ તમામ કૃત્યો ગુનાહિત છે.
આવા કેસોમાં બેઈલ (જામીન) મેળવવો અત્યંત ટેકનિકલ પ્રક્રિયા છે, અને યોગ્ય કાનૂની રણનીતિ વગર આરોપીને લાંબા સમય સુધી જેલવાસ ભોગવવો પડે છે.
આ ક્ષેત્રમાં એડવોકેટ પરેશ એમ. મોદી, અમદાવાદ ગુજરાતમાં દારૂ કેસના બેઈલ (જામીન) માટે અત્યંત અનુભવી અને સફળ વકીલ તરીકે જાણીતા છે.
એડવોકેટ પરેશ એમ મોદી – ગુજરાત હાઇકોર્ટમાં દારૂ કેસના બેલ માટે અગ્રણી વકીલ
એડવોકેટ પરેશ એમ મોદી ગુજરાતમાં દારૂના કેસ માટે હાઇકોર્ટ બેલ એડવોકેટ તરીકે વિશેષ ઓળખ ધરાવે છે. તેઓ Gujarat Prohibition Act હેઠળ નોંધાયેલા દારૂ લાવવું, દારૂ વેચાણ, દારૂ સંગ્રહ, પાર્ટી રેડ, બૂટલેગિંગ, દારૂ સ્મગ્લિંગ, અને વાહન જપ્તી જેવા ગંભીર ગુનાઓમાં Anticipatory Bail, Regular Bail, FIR Quashing અને Stay જેવા કાનૂની ઉપાયો માટે જાણીતા છે.
જો તમે અમદાવાદમાં “High Court Advocate for Liquor Bail near me”, Prohibition Act Bail Lawyer in Gujarat, અથવા Liquor FIR Quashing Advocate in Gujarat શોધી રહ્યા છો તો એડવોકેટ પરેશ એમ. મોદી વિશ્વસનીય અને પરિણામ આધારિત કાનૂની સેવા આપે છે.
તેમની રક્ષણાત્મક રણનીતિઓમાં મુખ્યત્વે:
- Conscious Possession ના અભાવની દલીલ
• ખોટી રીતે લગાવવામાં આવેલી કલમ 65, 66, 81, 83, 98(2), 116(B) ને પડકાર
• ગેરકાયદેસર સીઝર અને સેમ્પલિંગની ખામીઓ
• વાહન કન્ફિસ્કેશન અને રિલીઝ માટે હાઇકોર્ટ કાર્યવાહી
નો સમાવેશ થાય છે.
એડવોકેટ પરેશ એમ મોદી ગુજરાત હાઇકોર્ટ, સેશન્સ કોર્ટ અને જિલ્લા કોર્ટમાં દારૂના કેસના બેઈલ માટે વિશેષ પ્રેક્ટિસ ધરાવે છે અને અનેક આરોપીઓને તાત્કાલિક બેલ અને કાનૂની સુરક્ષા અપાવી ચૂક્યા છે.
જો તમને Liquor Arrest Bail in Gujarat, High Court Advocate for Vehicle Release in Liquor Case, અથવા Prohibition Act High Court Bail Lawyer જોઈએ હોય તો એડવોકેટ પરેશ એમ મોદી શ્રેષ્ઠ પસંદગી છે.
લાગુ પડતા મુખ્ય કાયદા અને કલમો
કલમ 65 (65(e))
દારૂ લાવવો, લઈ જવો, વેચવો, સંગ્રહ કરવો, ટ્રાન્સપોર્ટ કરવો – આ તમામ કૃત્યો માટે મુખ્ય કલમ.
કલમ 66
ગુજરાતમાં બહારથી દારૂ પીધા પછી રાજ્યમાં પ્રવેશ કરવો.
કલમ 98(2) – વાહન જપ્તી અને કન્ફિસ્કેશન
જો દારૂ વાહનમાં પકડાય તો તે વાહન જપ્ત કરવામાં આવે છે અને વાહન છોડાવવું અઘરું બની જાય છે.
કલમ 81, 83, 116(B)
સહાય, સાજિશ, સહભાગી બનવું, પુરવઠો કરવો વગેરે માટે ઉપયોગ થતી કલમો.
20 લીટર નિયમ (જથ્થા સંબંધિત મહત્વપૂર્ણ નિયમ)
ગુજરાત સરકારની 2-7-2019ની નોટિફિકેશન મુજબ:
👉 જો જપ્ત થયેલ દારૂ 20 લીટર અથવા તેનાથી વધુ હોય તો:
• વાહન છોડાવવું મુશ્કેલ બને છે
• આરોપ ગંભીર ગણાય છે
• બેઈલ (જામીન) માટે કડક વલણ લેવામાં આવે છે
• વાહન કન્ફિસ્કેશન/ઓક્શન સુધી જઈ શકે છે
બેઈલ (જામીન) ના પ્રકાર
| પ્રકાર | અર્થ |
| Anticipatory Bail | ધરપકડ પહેલા |
| Regular Bail | ધરપકડ પછી |
| Default Bail | ચાર્જશીટ મોડું થાય ત્યારે |
હાલ બેઈલ (જામીન)ની પ્રક્રિયા BNSS (Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) મુજબ ચાલે છે.
આરોપીના મજબૂત ડિફેન્સ (રક્ષણના આધાર)
1. Conscious Possession નથી
આરોપી પાસે દારૂ હોવાનો સીધો પુરાવો નથી.
2. માત્ર હાજરી – મુખ્ય આરોપી નથી
આરોપી માત્ર ડ્રાઈવર/મજુર/મિત્ર છે.
3. કોઈ અગાઉનો ગુનો નથી
Clean antecedents – પહેલાનો કોઈ કેસ નથી.
4. પંચનામા, સેમ્પલિંગ, નોટિફિકેશનમાં ખામી
કાયદાકીય ખામીઓ બેઈલ (જામીન) માટે મહત્વપૂર્ણ બની જાય છે.
5. ગુનો મેજિસ્ટ્રેટ કોર્ટમાં ચાલે એવો છે
લાંબો જેલવાસ જરૂરી નથી.
આરોપીના હકમાં ચુકાદાઓ
ગુજરાત હાઇકોર્ટે અનેક ચુકાદાઓમાં:
- Section 65, 81, 83, 98(2), 116B હેઠળના આરોપીઓના બેઈલ (જામીન) મંજૂર કર્યા છે
• જ્યાં આરોપીની ભૂમિકા નાની હોય
• કોઈ ક્રિમિનલ રેકોર્ડ ન હોય
• તપાસ પૂર્ણ થઈ ગઈ હોય
સુપ્રીમ કોર્ટે પણ 98(2) હેઠળ 20 લીટર નિયમને માન્ય રાખ્યો છે પરંતુ કાયદેસર પ્રક્રિયા પાલન પર ભાર મૂક્યો છે.
કેમ Advocate Paresh M Modi શ્રેષ્ઠ છે?
- 1000+ બેઈલ (જામીન) કેસમાં અનુભવ
• Prohibition Act હેઠળ વિશેષ પ્રેક્ટિસ
• Vehicle Release & Quashingમાં કુશળતા
• Gujarat High Court સુધી અસરકારક રજૂઆત
Ahmedabad, Adalaj, Adipur, Ahwa, Aithor, Alang, Ambaji, Aambaliyasan, Amod, Amreli, Anand, Ankleshwar, Anjar, Atul, Babra, Bagasara, Balasinor, Banaskantha, Bardoli, Baroda, Bayad, Bavla, Bechraji, Bhachau, Bharuch, Bhavnagar, Bhuj, Bilimora, Borsad, Botad, Chaklasi, Chanasma, Chhota Udepur, Chikhli, Chorvad, Chotila, Dahisara, Dahod, Dahegam, Dakor, Danta, Dang, Dediapada, Deesa, Devbhumi Dwarka, Dhanera, Dhandhuka, Dholera, Dhrangadhra, Dhoraji, Dhrol, Dharampur, Disa, Diu, Dwarka, Fatehganj, Gandhidham, Gandhinagar, Gir Somnath, Ghoghamba, Godhra, Gondal, Gozaria, Halol, Halvad, Hansot, Harij, Himmat Nagar, Idar, Jamjodhpur, Jamnagar, Jasdan, Jetalpur, Jetpur, Jambughoda, Junagadh, Kachchh, Kadi, Kalol, Kanjari, Kanodar, Kankrej, Karjan, Katargam, Keshod, Kheda, Khambhat, Kodinar, Kosamba, Koth, Kutiyana, Lakhtar, Lalpur, Lathi, Limdi, Lunawada, Mahisagar, Mahemdavad, Mahuva, Malpur, Mandvi, Mansa, Manavadar, Mangrol, Matar, Mehsana, Modasa, Morbi, Muli, Mundra, Nadiad, Nakhatrana, Naliya, Narmada, Naroda, Narol, Navsari, Okha, Olpad, Padra, Palanpur, Paliyad, Palitana, Panchmahal, Patan, Petlad, Pipavav, Porbandar, Prantij, Radhanpur, Rajkot, Rajpipla, Ranavav, Ranpur, Sabarkantha, Salaya, Samakhiali, Sanand, Santrampur, Savarkundla, Savli, Sayan, Shahera, Shihor, Sidhpur, Sikka, Sojitra, Songadh, Surat, Surendranagar, Sutrapada, Talaja, Talod, Tapi, Tarapur, Tharad, Thasra, Umreth, Una, Unjha, Upleta, Umergam, Vadnagar, Vadodara, Vaghodia, Vaav, Valsad, Vansda, Vapi, Veraval, Vijapur, Visnagar, Viramgam, Vyara, Wankaner, Zinzuwada,
Legal Words and Definitions
Act
An Act is a formalized law passed by the legislature or parliament that governs specific areas, policies, or regulations. It serves as the legal framework for ensuring compliance and justice.
Section
A Section is a subdivision of an Act that elaborates on specific provisions, rules, or regulations under the Act. Each section addresses distinct aspects of the law.
Court
A Court is a judicial body empowered to resolve disputes, interpret laws, and deliver justice based on legal principles. Courts operate at various levels, including local, state, and national jurisdictions.
Case
A Case refers to a legal dispute brought before a court for resolution. Cases can be civil, criminal, or administrative in nature, depending on the type of legal issue involved.
Lawyer
A professional legally qualified to advise clients and represent them before courts or legal authorities.
Advocate
A person enrolled under the Advocates Act, 1961, authorized to practice law and plead cases before courts in India.
Vakil
A traditional Indian term meaning lawyer or advocate who represents parties in legal matters.
Attorney
A legal representative or agent empowered to act for another in legal or business transactions.
Barrister
A lawyer trained in advocacy, typically practicing in higher courts, especially in the UK-style legal system.
Solicitor
A legal practitioner who advises clients, prepares legal documents, and may brief barristers for court appearances.
Lawyers
Lawyers are legal professionals trained to provide advice, represent clients in legal matters, and advocate in courts or tribunals.
Advocates
Advocates are specialized lawyers authorized to appear and plead cases in higher courts on behalf of their clients.
Law Firm
An organization of lawyers providing legal services, advice, and representation to individuals and businesses.
In
The word in signifies location, position, or context within a specific legal jurisdiction, region, or topic.
For
For refers to the purpose or intention behind an action, often used to denote legal representation or services provided to clients.
Near
Near implies proximity, often used to locate services, courts, or legal professionals within a specific area.
Near Me
Near Me is a phrase frequently used in searches to find nearby services, such as lawyers, courts, or legal assistance within a user’s location.
Ahmedabad
Ahmedabad is a prominent city in Gujarat, India, known for its legal hubs, courts, and skilled lawyers handling a wide range of cases.
Gujarat
Gujarat is a state in western India with a robust legal framework and multiple courts addressing various civil, criminal, and corporate cases.
Gandhinagar
Gandhinagar is the capital city of Gujarat, hosting significant legal institutions and administrative offices.
India
India is a country with a vast legal system governed by the Constitution and various laws, hosting multiple courts from district to Supreme Court levels.
સંપર્ક વિગતો- એડવોકેટ પરેશ એમ મોદી (અમદાવાદ, ગુજરાત)
📞 WhatsApp (માત્ર મેસેજ): 9925002031
📞 Office: 079-48001468
📧 advocatepmmodi@gmail.com
🌐 www.advocatepmmodi.in
🏢 Office No. C/112, Supath-2 Complex, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad

