Author: Advocate Paresh M Modi

As a law firm, Advocate Paresh M Modi is having a team of expert Advocates who provide expert advice and guide the clients on the complicated issues of court proceedings in India. Our law firm has been advising clients to adopt a systematic approach as per the provisions of the law and the requirements of the statute. Being the Best Advocate in Ahmedabad, Advocate Paresh M Modi has been serving the clients according to the provisions of law as Advocate Paresh M Modi is an Experienced Lawyer in Gujarat. Paresh M Modi and his associates have been rendering excellent work owing to their experience in Gujarat High Court for more than 7 years together and having established themselves as a seasoned advocate in the High Court of Gujarat by dealing with various matters in a different fields. It has been made possible to see that the client in any corner of the State of Gujarat could get genuine legal advice and the presence of a lawyer on account of the association with Advocates in various cities of the State of Gujarat.

Categories Criminal Cases, Criminal Lawyer, Legal Disputes

Section 154 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973

Section 154 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973

(1) Every information relating to the commission of a cognizable offence, if given orally to an officer in charge of a police station, shall be reduced to writing by him or under his direction and be read over to the informant; and every such information, whether given in writing or reduced to writing as aforesaid, shall be signed by the person giving it and the substance thereof shall be entered in a book to be kept by such officer in such form as the State Government may prescribe in this behalf.

Provided that if the information is given by the woman against whom an offence under section 326A, section 326B, section 354, section 354A, section 354B, section 354C, section 354D, section 376, section 376A, section 376AB, section 376B, section 376C, section 376D, section 376D A, section 376D B), section 376E or section 509 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) is alleged to have been committed or attempted, then such information shall be recorded, by a woman police officer or any woman officer.

Provided further that

(a) in the event that the person against whom an offence under section 354, section 354A, section 354B, section 354C, section 354D, section 376, ‘[section 376A, section 376AB, section 376B, section 376C, section 376D, section 376DA, section 376DB), section 376E or section 509 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) is alleged to have been committed or attempted, is temporarily or • permanently mentally or physically disabled, then such information shall be recorded by a police officer, at the residence of the person seeking to report such offence or at a convenient place of such person’s choice, in the presence of an interpreter or a special educator, as the case may be.

(b) the recording of such information shall be video graphed.

(c) the police officer shall get the statement of the person recorded by a Judicial Magistrate under clause (a) of sub-section (5A) of section 164 as soon as possible.)

(2) A copy of the information as recorded under sub-section (1) shall be given forthwith, free of cost, to the informant.

(3) Any person, aggrieved by a refusal on the part of an officer in charge of a police station to record the information referred to in sub-section (1) may send the substance of such information, in writing and by post, to the Superintendent of Police concerned who, if satisfied that such information discloses the commission of a cognizable offence, shall either investigate the case himself or direct an investigation to be made by any police officer subordinate to him, in the manner provided by this Code and such officer shall have all the powers of an officer in charge of the police station in relation to that offence.

सीआरपीसी की धारा 154 :-

(1) संज्ञेय अपराध के किए जाने से संबंधित प्रत्येक इत्तिला, यदि पुलिस थाने के भारसाधक अधिकारी को मौखिक दी गई है तो उसके द्वारा या उसके निदेशाधीन लेखबद्ध कर ली जाएगी और इत्तिला देने वाले को पढ़कर सुनाई जाएगी और प्रत्येक ऐसी इत्तिला पर, चाहे वह लिखित रूप में दी गई हो या पूर्वोक्त रूप में लेखबद्ध की गई हो, उस व्यक्ति द्वारा हस्ताक्षर किए जाएंगे, जो उसे दे और उसका सार ऐसी पुस्तक में, जो उस अधिकारी द्वारा ऐसे रूप में रखी जाएगी जिसे राज्य सरकार इस निमित्त विहित करे, प्रविष्ट किया जाएगा।

परन्तु यदि किसी स्त्री द्वारा, जिसके विरुद्ध भारतीय दण्ड संहिता (1860 का 45) की धारा 326 क, धारा 326 ख, धारा 354, धारा 354क, धारा 354ख, धारा 354ग, धारा 354घ, धारा 376, धारा 376 क, धारा 376 क ख, धारा 376ख, धारा 376ग, धारा 376 घ, धारा 376 घ क, धारा 376घ ख, धारा 376ङ या धारा 509 के अधीन किसी अपराध के किए जाने या किए जाने का प्रयत्न किए जाने का अभिकथन किया गया है, कोई इत्तिला दी जाती है तो ऐसी इत्तिला किसी महिला पुलिस अधिकारी या किसी महिला अधिकारी द्वारा अभिलिखित की जाएगी |

परन्तु यह और कि:

(क) यदि वह व्यक्ति, जिसके विरुद्ध भारतीय दण्ड संहिता (1860 का 45) की धारा 354, धारा 354क, धारा 354ख, धारा 354ग, धारा 354घ, धारा 376, धारा 376क, धारा 376कख, धारा 376ख, धारा 376ग, धारा 376घ, धारा 376घक, धारा 376घख, धारा 376ङ या धारा 509 के अधीन किसी अपराध के किए जाने का या किए जाने का प्रयत्न किए जाने का अभिकथन किया गया है, अस्थायी या स्थायी रूप से मानसिक या शारीरिक रूप से नि:शक्त है, तो ऐसी इत्तिला किसी पुलिस अधिकारी द्वारा उस व्यक्ति के, जो ऐसे अपराध की रिपोर्ट करने की ईप्सा करता है, निवास-स्थान पर या उस व्यक्ति के विकल्प के किसी सुगम स्थान पर, यथास्थिति, किसी द्विभाषिए या किसी विशेष प्रबोधक की उपस्थिति में अभिलिखित की जाएगी;

(ख) ऐसी इत्तिला के अभिलेखन की वीडियो फिल्म तैयार की जाएगी;

(ग) पुलिस अधिकारी, धारा 164 की उपधारा (5क) के खण्ड (क) के अधीन किसी न्यायिक मजिस्ट्रेट द्वारा उस व्यक्ति का कथन यथा संभवशीघ्र अभिलिखित कराएगा।

(2) उपधारा (1) के अधीन अभिलिखित इत्तिला की प्रतिलिपि, इत्तिला देने वाले को तत्काल निःशुल्क जाएगी।

(3) कोई व्यक्ति जो किसी पुलिस थाने के भारसाधक अधिकारी के उपधारा (1) में निर्दिष्ट इत्तिला को अभिलिखित करने से इंकार करने से व्यथित है, ऐसी इत्तिला का सार लिखित रूप में और डाक द्वारा संबद्ध पुलिस अधीक्षक को भेज सकता है जो, यदि उसका यह समाधान हो जाता है कि ऐसी इत्तिला से किसी संज्ञेय अपराध का किया जाना प्रकट होता है तो, या तो स्वयं मामले का अन्वेषण करेगा या अपने अधीनस्थ किसी पुलिस अधिकारी द्वारा इस संहिता द्वारा उपबंधित रीति में अन्वेषण किए जाने का निदेश देगा और उस अधिकारी को उस अपराध के संबंध में पुलिस थाने के भारसाधक अधिकारी की सभी शक्तियाँ होंगी।

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Categories Cheque Bounce Lawyer

Cheque Bounce Section 138 Judgement

Mahendra kumar Kedarnath Modi and Ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and Anr:2018 (1) G.L.H. 288.

Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881-S.138-Complaint for dishonour of cheque-Cognizance of an offience-Magistrate is required to issue summons for attendance of accused only on examination of the Complaint and on satisfaction that there is sufficient ground for taking cognizance of the offence and that he is competent to take such cognizance of offence- Once the Magistrate forms his opinion that there is sufficient ground for proceeding and issue summons, there is no question of going back following the procedure u/s. 201 of the Code-In the absence of any power of review or recall, the Magistrate cannot recall the sum-mons under sec. 201 of the Code- The contention raised on behalf of the Complainant that the accused should have raised the issue of territorial jurisdiction before the Magistrate at the earliest so that the Court could have looked into the same keeping in mind the provision of Section 201 of the Code has no application.

Mahendra kumar Kedarnath Modi and Ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and Anr:2018 (1) G.L.H. 288.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881-Section 138 (b)-Cause of action ac-crual of-cheque presented in appeal period without service of notice-No cause of action will arise-It simply meant no cause to prosecuter drawer.

Mahendra kumar Kedarnath Modi and Ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and Anr:2018 (1) G.L.H. 288.

પરક્રામ્ય ખતોનો અધિનિયમ, ૧૮૮૧- કલમ ૧૩૮-ચેક પરત ફરવા માટે ફરિયાદ-એક ગુંહાની નોંધ લીધેલ-ફરિયાદને તપાસની વખતે માજીસ્ટ્રેટ ફકત આરોપીને હાજર રહેવા માટે સમન્સ પાઠવવાની જરૂર છે અને ગુંહાની નોંધ લેવા માટે સમક્ષ છે-એક વખત માજીસ્ટ્રેટનો તેનો મત બંધાય કે કાર્યવાહી માટે તેમાં પુરતા મુદા છે અને સમન્સ મોકલે, તેમાં સહિતાની કલમ ૨૦૧ હેઠળ પાછા ફરવાનો પ્રશ્ન નથી-ફેર વિચારણાની અથવા ફેર તપાસની અથવા પાછા બોલાવવાની કોઇ સતાની ગેરહાજરીમાં મેજીસ્ટ્રેટ સંહિતાની કલમ ૨૦૧ હેઠળ સમન્સ પરત બોલાવી/મેળવી શકે નહિ-ફરિયાદ પક્ષ તરફથી એવો વાંધો ઉભો કરેલ કે આરોપીએ સૌથી પહેલા મેજીસ્ટ્રેટ સમક્ષ પ્રાદેશિક હકુમતનો મુદ્દો ઉભો કરેલ જેથી કે અદાલતે સંહિતાની કલમ ૨૦૧ ની જોગવાઇને ધ્યાનમાં રાખતા તેમાં જોવુ જોઇતું હતું તેને માન્યતા નથી.

Mahendra kumar Kedarnath Modi and Ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and Anr:2018 (1) G.L.H. 288.

વટાઉખત અધિનિયમ ૧૮૮૧- કલમ ૧૩૮ (બી)- દાવાનુ કારણ- ઉપસ્થિત થવાનું- ચેકને, નોટીસ આપ્યા વિના અપીલના સમયમાં રજુ કર્યો-દાવાનું કોઇ કારણ ઉપસ્થિત થશે નહિ- એનો અર્થ ફકત એવો જ છે કે ચેક કાઢી આપનારની સામે ફરિયાદનું કોઇ કારણ નથી.

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Categories Cheque Bounce Lawyer

Cheque Bounce Section 138 Judgement

Zen MArketing Limited Vs. State of Gujarat 2018 (3) G.L.H. 63.

Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881- S. 138 and S. 142(2)- Complaint for dishonour of cheque- jurisdiction-Complainant having an account with the Bank of Baroda at Vadodara-The accused issued cheques in favour of the Complain-ant drawn on a drawee Bank having branch at New Delhi-As the Complainant was having an agreement with the Corporation Bank at New Delhi for facility of Fund Collection System whereby the daily fund/amount is collected from all centres and credited in the account of the Complainant at Bank of Baroda, vadodara, the Complainant handed over the cheques of the accused to the Corporation Bank,New Delhi for the purpose of clearance- However,Corporation Bank informed the Complainant that all the cheques had been dishonored to the account main-tained by the Complainant with the Bank of Baroda having branch at Vadodara, when presented for clearance-The Complainant therefore filed Complaints in the Court of Magistrate at Vadodara-Held,although the cheques issued by the accused where collected by the Complainant at New Delhi and where presented for clearance with the Coporation Bank at New Delhi, it could be said that the cheque were presented through an account maintained by the Complainant with Bank of Baroda having branch at Vadodara-It is the original account of the Complainant maintained with the Bank of Baroda which is important and without the said account, the arrangement with the Corporation Bank can never come into play-Without the account of the Complainant maintained with the Bank of Baroda, the Corporation Bank could not have given credit if the cheques have been cleared-Thus, the Court at Vadodara has the territorial jurisdiction and the Complaint filed by the Complainant are maintainable.

Zen Marketing Limited Vs. State of Gujarat 2018 (3) G.L.H. 63.

પરક્રામ્ય લેખોનો અ‍ધિનિયમ, ૧૮૮૧- કલમ ૧૩૮ અને કલમ ૧૪૨(૨)-ચેક પરત ફરવા માટે ફરિયાદ-હકુમત-ફરિયાદીનું એક ખાતુ બેંક ઓફ બરોડા, વડોદરામાં હોવાથી- એક આરોપીએ ફરીયાદીની તરફેણમાં ચેક નવી દિલ્હી બ્રાંચનો આપેલ-કારણ ફરિયાદીને કોર્પોરેશન બેંક, નવી દિલ્લી ખાતે એક વ્યવસ્થા હોવાથી ભંડોળ ભેગુ કરવાની પદ્રતિની સગવડ હોવાથી દરેક હેતુ ઉપરથી ભંડોળ/રકમ કાયમી રોજ ભેગી કરવામા આવતી અને ફરિયાદીના બેંક ઓફ બરોડાના ખાતા વડોદરામાં ક્રેડિટ આપવામાં આવતી, ફરિયાદીએ આપેલ ચેક આરોપીએ કોર્પોરેશન બેંક નવી દિલ્હીને કલીયર કરવાના હેતુથી આપેલ-તેમ છ્તાં, કોર્પોરેશન બેંકે ફરિયાદીને જણાવેલ કે ફરિયાદીના બેંક ઓફ બરોડામાં ચલાવવામાં આવતા ખાતામાંથી બધા ચેકો કરલીયરંસ માટે રજુ કરવામાં આવતા બેંક ઓફ બરોડાની બ્રાંચ/શાખામાં પરત ફરતા હોઇ- આથી ફરિયાદીએ વડોદરા મેજીસ્ટ્રેટની અદાલતમાં ફરિયાદ દાખલ કરેલ-ઠરાવ્યું, તેમ છતાં ફરિયાદી આરોપી દ્રારા આપવામાં આવતા ચેક નવી દિલ્હીમાં ભેગા કરતાં અને જયારે નવી દિલહીની કોર્પોરેશન બેંકમાં કલીયરન્સ માટે રજુ કરવામાં આવતા, એવું કહી શકાય કે ફરિયાદી દ્રારા ચલાવવામાં આવતા બેંક ઓફ બરોડાના ખાતામાં વડોદરા ખાતે બ્રાંચ હોવાથી ખાતામાં રજૂ થતા હતા-તે ફરિયાદી દ્રારા બેંક ઓફ બરોડા સાથે ચલાવવામાં આવતુ મૂળ/ઓરીજિનલ ખાતુ કે જે અગત્યનું અને તે ખાતા સિવાય, કોર્પોરેશન બેંકની વ્યવસ્થા સાથે કોઇ દિવસ ઉપયોગ/પ્લેમાં આવતુ નહિ-ફરિયાદીના બેંક ઓફ બરોડા સાથે ચલાવવાના ખાતા સિવાય, કોર્પોરેશન બેંકમાં જમા આપી શકતા નહિ જો ચેક કલીયર થયેલ હોય- આથી, વડોદરા ખાતેની અદાલતને પ્રાદેશિક હકુમત હતી અને ફરિયાદી દ્રારા કરવામાં આવેલ ફરિયાદ ટકવાપાત્ર છે.

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Categories Legal Disputes

The Indian Evidence Act 1872 : Section 115 Estoppel

Section 115 Estoppel

When one person has, by his declaration, act or omission, intentionally caused or permitted another person to believe a thing to be true and to act upon such belief, neither he nor his representative shall be allowed, in any suit or proceeding between himself and such person or his representative, to deny the truth of that thing.

Illustration

A intentionally and falsely leads B to believe that certain land belongs to A, and thereby induces B to buy and pay for it.

The land afterwards becomes the property of A, and A seeks to set aside the sale on the ground that, at the time of the sale, he had no title. He must not be allowed to prove his want of title.

धारा 115 विबंध :

जबकि एक व्यक्ति ने अपनी घोषणा, कार्य या लोप द्वारा अन्य व्यक्ति को विश्वास साशय कराया है या कर लेने दिया है कि कोई बात सत्य है और ऐसे विश्वास पर कार्य कराया या करने दिया है, तब न तो उसे और न उसके प्रतिनिधि को अपने और ऐसे व्यक्ति के, या उसके प्रतिनिधि के, बीच किसी वाद या कार्यवाही में उस बात की सत्यता का प्रत्याख्यान करने दिया जाएगा।

दृष्टांत

क साशय और मिथ्या रूप से ख को यह विश्वास करने के लिए प्रेरित करता है कि अमुक भूमिका की है, और तद्द्वारा ख को उसके क्रय करने और उसका मूल्य चुकाने के लिए उत्प्रेरित करता है।

तत्पश्चात भूमि क की सम्पत्ति हो जाती है और क इस आधार पर कि विक्रय के समय उसका उसमें हक नहीं था, विक्रय अपास्त करने की ईप्सा करता है। उसे अपने हक का अभाव साबित नहीं करने दिया जाएगा।

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Categories Legal Disputes

The Indian Evidence Act 1872 : Section 145

Section-145. Cross-examination as to previous statements in writing.

A witness may be cross-examined as to previous statements made by him in writing or reduced into writing, and relevant to matters in question, without such writing being shown to him, or being proved; but, if it is intended to contradict him by the writing, his attention must, before the writing can be proved, be called to those parts of it which are to be used for the purpose of contradicting him.

धारा 145 भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम – पूर्वतन लेखबद्ध कथनों के बारे में प्रतिपरीक्षा —

किसी साक्षी की उन पूर्वतन कथनों के बारे में, जो उसने लिखित रूप में किए हैं या जो लेखबद्ध किए गए हैं और जो प्रश्नगत बातों से सुसंगत हैं, ऐसा लेख उसे दिखाए बिना, या ऐसे लेख साबित हुए बिना, प्रतिपरीक्षा की जा सकेगी, किन्तु यदि उस लेख द्वारा उसका खण्डन करने का आशय है तो उस लेख को साबित किए जा सकने के पूर्व उसका ध्यान उस लेख के उन भागों की ओर आकर्षित करना होगा जिनका उपयोग उसका खण्डन करने के प्रयोजन से किया जाना है।

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

1 2 3 5