Categories Cheque Bounce Lawyer, Criminal Cases, Criminal Lawyer

Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 : Section 141

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881-Section 141 – Liability of vicarious na-ture-Burden of proof lies on appellant-Onus has to be discharged by good evidence, High Court committed error in discharging liability-Whether or not they were partners in firm is a fact, to be established in trial-Initial burden by way of averment has been made by appellant.

વટાઉખત અધિનિયમ ૧૮૮૧-કલમ ૧૪૧ – પ્રતિનિધક સ્વરૂપની જવાબદારી-અપીલકર્તા પર પુરાવાનો બોજો પડે છે-સારા પુરાવાથી ભાર ઉતારવાનો છે-જવાબદારી રદ કરવામાં હાઇકોર્ટ ભુલ કરી છે-તેઓ પેઢીમાં ભાગીદાર હતા કે નહિ તે એક હકીકત છે-જે ટ્રાયલમાં પુરવાર કરવાની છે-ખાતરીપૂર્વક બોલવાથી શરૂનો બોજો અપીલકર્તા પર છે.

Judgement

Rallis India Ltd v.Poduru Vidya Bhusan, 2012 (1) SCC (Cri) 778: 2011 (13) SCC 88: 2011 (3) Supreme 244:2011 (2) Crimes (SC) 177 :2011 (1) Bankmann 617.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881-Section 141 – Criminal liability attracted-If accused is able to prove to satisfaction of Court that offence was commited without his Knowledge or he has exercised diligence to prove commission of of-fence he will not be liable to be punished-final judgment would depend on evidence adduced.

વટાઉખત અધિનિયમ ૧૮૮૧-કલમ ૧૪૧ – કંપનીનો નોન-એકિઝ્કયુટિવ ડિરેકટર-ડિરેકટરની ફરિયાદ કે તેણી ડિરેકટર તરીકે બંધ થઇ ગઇ હોવા છતાં તેને આરોપી તરીકે બોલવવામાં આવે છે-ફરિયાદીએ જુની તારીખના જવાબને ધ્યાનમાં ન લીધો-કાયદાકીય નોટિસમાં એવી સ્પષ્ટ માહિતી સમાવિષ્ટ છે કે તેણીએ એક દિવસ પહેલાં જ રાજીનામું આપ્યું હતું.

Anita Malhotra v. Apparel Export Promotion Council, AIR 2012 SC 31:2012 (1) SCC 520:2011 (8) Supreme 1: 2012 CrLJ 625:2011 (12) JT 550:2012 (1) SCC (Cri) 496:2011 (4) Crimes (SC) 281:2011 (2) Bankmann 504.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881-Section 141 – Non executive Directors of Company-Girevance of Director that in Spite of assertion that she ceased to be a Director she was arrayed as accused-Complainant did not refer to reply on old date-Reply to statutory notice contains specific information that she had resigned be gone back.

વટાઉખત અધિનિયમ ૧૮૮૧-કલમ ૧૪૧ – ડાયરેકટરની જવાબદારી-ડાયરેકટરનું રાજીનામું કંપની દ્રારા સ્વીકારાયુ-તેના રાજીનામા સ્વીકાર્યા બાદના વ્યવહાર માટે તે જવાબદાર નથી-શબ્દ ‘કોઇપણ વ્યકિત’-ગુનો થયો ત્યારે તે તારીખે જે વ્યકિત હોય તે જવાબદાર.

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly regarded advocate based in Ahmedabad, known for his expertise in criminal law. As a distinguished lawyer at the Gujarat High Court, he specializes in a wide range of legal matters, making him a sought-after professional in various areas of law. Some of his notable specializations include handling cases related to cheque bounce, property disputes, cybercrime, court marriages, divorces, debt recovery tribunals (DRT), FIR quashing, land revenue disputes, anticipatory bail, PASA (Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act), family law, civil law, and more. Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Author Advocate Paresh M Modi
Categories Criminal Cases, Criminal Lawyer

Section 29 : The Code Of Criminal Procedure 1973

Section 29. Sentences which Magistrates may pass.

(1) The Court of a Chief Judicial Magistrate may pass any sentence authorised by law except a sentence of death or of imprisonment for life or of imprisonment for a term exceeding seven years.

(2) The Court of a Magistrate of the first class may pass a sentence of imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years, or of fine not exceeding five thousand rupees, or of both.

(3) The Court of a Magistrate of the second class may pass a sentence of imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year, or of fine not exceeding one thousand rupees, or of both.

(4) The Court of a Chief Metropolitan Magistrate shall have the powers of the Court of a Chief Judicial Magistrate and that of a Metropolitan Magistrate, the powers of the Court of a Magistrate of the first class.

धारा 29 – दण्डादेश, जो मजिस्ट्रेट दे सकेंगे —

(1) मुख्य न्यायिक मजिस्ट्रेट का न्यायालय मृत्यु या आजीवन कारावास या सात वर्ष से अधिक की अवधि के लिए कारावास के दण्डादेश के सिवाय कोई ऐसा दण्डादेश दे सकता है जो विधि द्वारा प्राधिकृत है।

(2) प्रथम वर्ग मजिस्ट्रेट का न्यायालय तीन वर्ष से अनधिक अवधि के लिए कारावास का या दस हजार रुपए से अनधिक जुर्माने का, या दोनों का, दण्डादेश दे सकता है ।

(3) द्वितीय वर्ग मजिस्ट्रेट का न्यायालय एक वर्ष से अनधिक अवधि के लिए कारावास का या पाँच हजार रुपए से अनधिक जुर्माने का, या दोनों का, दण्डादेश दे सकता है।

(4) मुख्य महानगर मजिस्ट्रेट के न्यायालय को मुख्य न्यायिक मजिस्ट्रेट के न्यायालय की शक्तियाँ और महानगर मजिस्ट्रेट के न्यायालय को प्रथम वर्ग मजिस्ट्रेट की शक्तियाँ होंगी।

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly regarded advocate based in Ahmedabad, known for his expertise in criminal law. As a distinguished lawyer at the Gujarat High Court, he specializes in a wide range of legal matters, making him a sought-after professional in various areas of law. Some of his notable specializations include handling cases related to cheque bounce, property disputes, cybercrime, court marriages, divorces, debt recovery tribunals (DRT), FIR quashing, land revenue disputes, anticipatory bail, PASA (Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act), family law, civil law, and more. Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Author Advocate Paresh M Modi
Categories Criminal Cases, Criminal Lawyer

Section-6 : The Code Of Criminal Procedure 1973

Section-6 Classes of Criminal Courts. – Besides the High Courts and the Courts constituted under any law, other than this Code, there shall be, in every State, the following classes of Criminal Courts, namely;

  1. Courts of Session;
  2. Judicial Magistrate of the first class and, in any Metropolitan area, Metropolitan Magistrate;
  3. Judicial Magistrate of the second class; and
  4. Executive Magistrates.

धारा 6 -दण्ड प्रक्रिया संहिता – उच्च न्यायालयों और इस संहिता से भिन्न किसी विधि के अधीन गठित न्यायालयों के अतिरिक्त, प्रत्येक राज्य में निम्नलिखित वर्गों के दण्ड न्यायालय होंगे अर्थात-

  1. सेशन न्यायालय
  2. प्रथम वर्ग न्यायिक मजिस्ट्रेट और किसी महानगर क्षेत्र में महानगर मजिस्ट्रेट
  3. द्वितीय वर्ग न्यायिक मजिस्ट्रेट और
  4. कार्यपालक मजिस्ट्रेट

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly regarded advocate based in Ahmedabad, known for his expertise in criminal law. As a distinguished lawyer at the Gujarat High Court, he specializes in a wide range of legal matters, making him a sought-after professional in various areas of law. Some of his notable specializations include handling cases related to cheque bounce, property disputes, cybercrime, court marriages, divorces, debt recovery tribunals (DRT), FIR quashing, land revenue disputes, anticipatory bail, PASA (Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act), family law, civil law, and more. Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Author Advocate Paresh M Modi
Categories Criminal Cases, Criminal Lawyer

Section 301 in The Indian Penal Code

Section 301 in The Indian Penal Code

301. Culpable homicide by causing death of person other than person whose death was intended.—If a person, by doing anything which he intends or knows to be likely to cause death, commits culpable homicide by causing the death of any person, whose death he neither intends nor knows himself to be likely to cause, the culpable homicide committed by the offender is of the description of which it would have been if he had caused the death of the person whose death he intended or knew himself to be likely to cause.

301 IPC जिस व्यक्ति की मृत्यु का इरादा था, उसके अलावा किसी अन्य व्यक्ति की मृत्यु कारित करके गैर इरादतन हत्या।

यदि कोई व्यक्ति ऐसा कुछ भी करता है जिसका वह इरादा करता है या जानता है कि मृत्यु का कारण बनना संभव है, किसी ऐसे व्यक्ति की मृत्यु का कारण बनता है, जिसकी मृत्यु का न तो वह इरादा रखता है और न ही खुद को होने की संभावना जानता है। अपराधी का वह विवरण है जिसके बारे में यह होता यदि वह उस व्यक्ति की मृत्यु का कारण बनता जिसकी मृत्यु का वह इरादा रखता था या खुद जानता था कि ऐसा करना संभव है।

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly regarded advocate based in Ahmedabad, known for his expertise in criminal law. As a distinguished lawyer at the Gujarat High Court, he specializes in a wide range of legal matters, making him a sought-after professional in various areas of law. Some of his notable specializations include handling cases related to cheque bounce, property disputes, cybercrime, court marriages, divorces, debt recovery tribunals (DRT), FIR quashing, land revenue disputes, anticipatory bail, PASA (Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act), family law, civil law, and more. Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Author Advocate Paresh M Modi
Categories Criminal Cases, Criminal Lawyer, Legal Disputes

Section 154 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973

Section 154 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973

(1) Every information relating to the commission of a cognizable offence, if given orally to an officer in charge of a police station, shall be reduced to writing by him or under his direction and be read over to the informant; and every such information, whether given in writing or reduced to writing as aforesaid, shall be signed by the person giving it and the substance thereof shall be entered in a book to be kept by such officer in such form as the State Government may prescribe in this behalf.

Provided that if the information is given by the woman against whom an offence under section 326A, section 326B, section 354, section 354A, section 354B, section 354C, section 354D, section 376, section 376A, section 376AB, section 376B, section 376C, section 376D, section 376D A, section 376D B), section 376E or section 509 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) is alleged to have been committed or attempted, then such information shall be recorded, by a woman police officer or any woman officer.

Provided further that

(a) in the event that the person against whom an offence under section 354, section 354A, section 354B, section 354C, section 354D, section 376, ‘[section 376A, section 376AB, section 376B, section 376C, section 376D, section 376DA, section 376DB), section 376E or section 509 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) is alleged to have been committed or attempted, is temporarily or • permanently mentally or physically disabled, then such information shall be recorded by a police officer, at the residence of the person seeking to report such offence or at a convenient place of such person’s choice, in the presence of an interpreter or a special educator, as the case may be.

(b) the recording of such information shall be video graphed.

(c) the police officer shall get the statement of the person recorded by a Judicial Magistrate under clause (a) of sub-section (5A) of section 164 as soon as possible.)

(2) A copy of the information as recorded under sub-section (1) shall be given forthwith, free of cost, to the informant.

(3) Any person, aggrieved by a refusal on the part of an officer in charge of a police station to record the information referred to in sub-section (1) may send the substance of such information, in writing and by post, to the Superintendent of Police concerned who, if satisfied that such information discloses the commission of a cognizable offence, shall either investigate the case himself or direct an investigation to be made by any police officer subordinate to him, in the manner provided by this Code and such officer shall have all the powers of an officer in charge of the police station in relation to that offence.

सीआरपीसी की धारा 154 :-

(1) संज्ञेय अपराध के किए जाने से संबंधित प्रत्येक इत्तिला, यदि पुलिस थाने के भारसाधक अधिकारी को मौखिक दी गई है तो उसके द्वारा या उसके निदेशाधीन लेखबद्ध कर ली जाएगी और इत्तिला देने वाले को पढ़कर सुनाई जाएगी और प्रत्येक ऐसी इत्तिला पर, चाहे वह लिखित रूप में दी गई हो या पूर्वोक्त रूप में लेखबद्ध की गई हो, उस व्यक्ति द्वारा हस्ताक्षर किए जाएंगे, जो उसे दे और उसका सार ऐसी पुस्तक में, जो उस अधिकारी द्वारा ऐसे रूप में रखी जाएगी जिसे राज्य सरकार इस निमित्त विहित करे, प्रविष्ट किया जाएगा।

परन्तु यदि किसी स्त्री द्वारा, जिसके विरुद्ध भारतीय दण्ड संहिता (1860 का 45) की धारा 326 क, धारा 326 ख, धारा 354, धारा 354क, धारा 354ख, धारा 354ग, धारा 354घ, धारा 376, धारा 376 क, धारा 376 क ख, धारा 376ख, धारा 376ग, धारा 376 घ, धारा 376 घ क, धारा 376घ ख, धारा 376ङ या धारा 509 के अधीन किसी अपराध के किए जाने या किए जाने का प्रयत्न किए जाने का अभिकथन किया गया है, कोई इत्तिला दी जाती है तो ऐसी इत्तिला किसी महिला पुलिस अधिकारी या किसी महिला अधिकारी द्वारा अभिलिखित की जाएगी |

परन्तु यह और कि:

(क) यदि वह व्यक्ति, जिसके विरुद्ध भारतीय दण्ड संहिता (1860 का 45) की धारा 354, धारा 354क, धारा 354ख, धारा 354ग, धारा 354घ, धारा 376, धारा 376क, धारा 376कख, धारा 376ख, धारा 376ग, धारा 376घ, धारा 376घक, धारा 376घख, धारा 376ङ या धारा 509 के अधीन किसी अपराध के किए जाने का या किए जाने का प्रयत्न किए जाने का अभिकथन किया गया है, अस्थायी या स्थायी रूप से मानसिक या शारीरिक रूप से नि:शक्त है, तो ऐसी इत्तिला किसी पुलिस अधिकारी द्वारा उस व्यक्ति के, जो ऐसे अपराध की रिपोर्ट करने की ईप्सा करता है, निवास-स्थान पर या उस व्यक्ति के विकल्प के किसी सुगम स्थान पर, यथास्थिति, किसी द्विभाषिए या किसी विशेष प्रबोधक की उपस्थिति में अभिलिखित की जाएगी;

(ख) ऐसी इत्तिला के अभिलेखन की वीडियो फिल्म तैयार की जाएगी;

(ग) पुलिस अधिकारी, धारा 164 की उपधारा (5क) के खण्ड (क) के अधीन किसी न्यायिक मजिस्ट्रेट द्वारा उस व्यक्ति का कथन यथा संभवशीघ्र अभिलिखित कराएगा।

(2) उपधारा (1) के अधीन अभिलिखित इत्तिला की प्रतिलिपि, इत्तिला देने वाले को तत्काल निःशुल्क जाएगी।

(3) कोई व्यक्ति जो किसी पुलिस थाने के भारसाधक अधिकारी के उपधारा (1) में निर्दिष्ट इत्तिला को अभिलिखित करने से इंकार करने से व्यथित है, ऐसी इत्तिला का सार लिखित रूप में और डाक द्वारा संबद्ध पुलिस अधीक्षक को भेज सकता है जो, यदि उसका यह समाधान हो जाता है कि ऐसी इत्तिला से किसी संज्ञेय अपराध का किया जाना प्रकट होता है तो, या तो स्वयं मामले का अन्वेषण करेगा या अपने अधीनस्थ किसी पुलिस अधिकारी द्वारा इस संहिता द्वारा उपबंधित रीति में अन्वेषण किए जाने का निदेश देगा और उस अधिकारी को उस अपराध के संबंध में पुलिस थाने के भारसाधक अधिकारी की सभी शक्तियाँ होंगी।

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Author Advocate Paresh M Modi
1 … 21 22 23 24