Categories Criminal Cases

The Insolvency and bankruptcy code, 2016, Section 2 | 9925002031 | Best lawyer for DRT Cases

The Insolvency and bankruptcy code, 2016, Section 2 | 9925002031 | Best lawyer for DRT Cases

The Insolvency and bankruptcy code, 2016

Part-I Preliminary

Section 2: Application:- The provisions of this Code shall apply to—

(a) Any company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 or under any previous company law;

(b) any other company governed by any special Act for the time being in force, except in so far as the said provisions are inconsistent with the provisions of such special Act;

(c) Any Limited Liability Partnership incorporated under the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008;

(d) such other body incorporated under any law for the time being in force, as the Central Government may, by notification, specify in this behalf; 1[***]

2[(e) personal guarantors to corporate debtors;

(f)  Partnership firms and proprietorship firms; and

(g) Individuals, other than persons referred to in clause (e).]

In relation to their insolvency, liquidation, voluntary liquidation or bankruptcy, as the case may be.

નાદારી અને નાદારી કોડ, 2016

ભાગ-1 પ્રારંભિક

વિભાગ 2: અરજી.*2. આ કોડની જોગવાઈઓ આને લાગુ પડશે-

(a) કંપની અધિનિયમ, 2013 હેઠળ અથવા કોઈપણ અગાઉના કંપની કાયદા હેઠળ સમાવિષ્ટ કોઈપણ કંપની;

(b) હાલના સમય માટે અમલમાં રહેલા કોઈપણ વિશેષ અધિનિયમ દ્વારા સંચાલિત કોઈપણ અન્ય કંપની, જ્યાં સુધી ઉલ્લેખિત જોગવાઈઓ આવા વિશેષ કાયદાની જોગવાઈઓ સાથે અસંગત હોય ત્યાં સુધી સિવાય;

(c) લિમિટેડ લાયબિલિટી પાર્ટનરશિપ એક્ટ, 2008 હેઠળ સમાવિષ્ટ કોઈપણ મર્યાદિત જવાબદારી ભાગીદારી;

(d) કેન્દ્ર સરકાર, સૂચના દ્વારા, આ વતી સ્પષ્ટ કરી શકે તે સમય માટે અમલમાં હોય તેવા કોઈપણ કાયદા હેઠળ સમાવિષ્ટ અન્ય સંસ્થા; 1[***]

2[(e) કોર્પોરેટ દેવાદારોને વ્યક્તિગત બાંયધરી આપનાર;

(f) ભાગીદારી પેઢીઓ અને માલિકી પેઢીઓ; અને

(g) ખંડ (e) માં ઉલ્લેખિત વ્યક્તિઓ સિવાયની વ્યક્તિઓ.]

તેમની નાદારી, લિક્વિડેશન, સ્વૈચ્છિક લિક્વિડેશન અથવા નાદારીના સંબંધમાં, જેમ કે કેસ હોઈ શકે.

दिवाला और दिवालियापन संहिता, 2016

भाग-I प्रारंभिकधारा

2: आवेदन.*2. इस संहिता के प्रावधान निम्नलिखित पर लागू होंगे-

(ए) कंपनी अधिनियम, 2013 या किसी पिछले कंपनी कानून के तहत निगमित कोई भी कंपनी;

(बी) किसी विशेष अधिनियम द्वारा शासित कोई अन्य कंपनी, सिवाय इसके कि जहां तक ​​उक्त प्रावधान ऐसे विशेष अधिनियम के प्रावधानों के साथ असंगत हैं;

(सी) सीमित देयता भागीदारी अधिनियम, 2008 के तहत शामिल कोई भी सीमित देयता भागीदारी;

 (डी) किसी भी समय लागू कानून के तहत शामिल ऐसा अन्य निकाय, जिसे केंद्र सरकार, अधिसूचना द्वारा, इस संबंध में निर्दिष्ट कर सकती है; 1[***] 2

[(ई) कॉर्पोरेट देनदारों के व्यक्तिगत गारंटर;

(एफ) साझेदारी फर्म और स्वामित्व फर्म; और

(छ) व्यक्ति, खंड (ई) में निर्दिष्ट व्यक्तियों के अलावा।]

उनके दिवालियेपन, परिसमापन, स्वैच्छिक परिसमापन या दिवालियापन के संबंध में, जैसा भी मामला हो।

Lawyers In Ahmedabad | 9925002031 |  Advocates In Ahmedabad

In Ahmedabad Gujarat, Advocate Paresh M Modi Is the Best Lawyer for DRT matters, Bank Loan Issues, Unpaid EMI Issues Credit Card bill Issues and Cheque Bounce Matters. he is the perfect Advocate for Criminal Cases, bail Matters, Family Matters and Land revenue matters including ancestral property disputes.

Author Advocate Paresh M Modi
Categories Criminal Cases

The Insolvency and bankruptcy code 2016 Section 1 | 9925002031 | Best lawyer for DRT Cases

The Insolvency and bankruptcy code, 2016, Section 1 | 9925002031 | Best lawyer for DRT Cases

The Insolvency and bankruptcy code, 2016

Part-I Preliminary

Section 1: Short title, extent and commencement.

 (1)      This Code may be called the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

 (2)      It extends to the whole of India:

            Provided that Part III of this Code Shall not extend to the state of Jammu and  Kashmir.

 (3)      It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by  notification in the Official                                Gazette, appoint:

            Provided that different dates may be appointed for different provisions of this Code and any reference in any                such provision to the commencement of this Code shall be construed as a reference to the commencement of                 that provision.

નાદારી અને નાદારી કોડ, 2016

ભાગ-1 પ્રારંભિક

  વિભાગ 1: ટૂંકું શીર્ષક, હદ અને પ્રારંભ.

(1)        આ કોડને નાદારી અને નાદારી સંહિતા, 2016 કહી શકાય.

(2)       તે સમગ્ર ભારતમાં વિસ્તરે છે:

            જો કે આ કોડનો ભાગ III જમ્મુ અને કાશ્મીર રાજ્ય સુધી વિસ્તરશે નહીં.

(3)    તે કેન્દ્ર સરકાર, સત્તાવાર ગેઝેટમાં સૂચના1 દ્વારા, નિમણૂક કરી શકે તેવી તારીખે  અમલમાં આવશે:

         પૂરી પાડવામાં આવેલ છે કે આ કોડની વિવિધ જોગવાઈઓ માટે અલગ-અલગ તારીખોની નિમણૂક કરવામાં આવી શકે છે અને આ           સંહિતાના પ્રારંભ માટે આવી કોઈપણ જોગવાઈમાંના કોઈપણ સંદર્ભને તે જોગવાઈના પ્રારંભના સંદર્ભ તરીકે  સમજવામાં આવશે.

दिवाला और दिवालियापन संहिता, 2016

भाग-I

 प्रारंभिक धारा 1: संक्षिप्त शीर्षक, विस्तार और प्रारंभ।

(1)      इस संहिता को दिवाला और दिवालियापन संहिता, 2016 कहा जा सकता है।

(2)      इसका विस्तार संपूर्ण भारत तक है:

            बशर्ते कि इस संहिता का भाग III जम्मू और कश्मीर राज्य तक विस्तारित नहीं  होगा।

3)    यह उस तारीख से लागू होगा जिसे केंद्र सरकार, आधिकारिक राजपत्र में  अधिसूचना 1 द्वारा, नियुक्त कर सकती है:

         बशर्ते कि इस संहिता के विभिन्न प्रावधानों के लिए अलग-अलग तिथियां   नियुक्त की जा सकें और इस संहिता के प्रारंभ के ऐसे किसी           भी प्रावधान में   किसी भी संदर्भ को उस प्रावधान के प्रारंभ के संदर्भ के रूप में माना जाएगा।

Notifications (1)

Ministry of corporate Affairs, Noti. No.S.O.2618(E), dated August 5, 2016, Published in the Gazette of India, Extra, Part II, Section 3(ii), dated 5th August, 2016, P.1,No.1949

In exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to sub-section (3) of Section I of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy code, 2016 (31 of 2016), the Central Government hereby appoints the 5th of August, 2016 as the date on which the provisions of Sections 188 to 194 (both Inclusive) of the said code shall come shall come into force.

(2)

Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Noti.No.S.O.2746 (E), dated August 19,2016, Published in the Gazette of India, Extra.,Part II, Section 3(ii), dated 19th August, 2016,P.2.No.2064

In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of Section I of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (31 of 2016), the central Government hereby appoints the 19th August, 2016 as the date on which the provisions of following sections of the said Code shall come into force-

સૂચનાઓ (1)

કોર્પોરેટ બાબતોના મંત્રાલય, 5 ઓગસ્ટ, 2016ના રોજ, નોટી.નં.S.O.2618(E), ભારતના ગેઝેટમાં પ્રકાશિત, વધારાના, ભાગ II, કલમ 3(ii), તારીખ 5મી ઓગસ્ટ, 2016, P.1,નં. .1949

નાદારી અને નાદારી કોડ, 2016 (31 નું 2016) ની કલમ I ની પેટા-કલમ (3) ને આપેલ સત્તાઓનો ઉપયોગ કરીને, કેન્દ્ર સરકાર આથી તારીખ 5મી ઓગસ્ટ, 2016 ના રોજ નિમણૂક કરે છે. જે ઉપરોક્ત કોડની કલમ 188 થી 194 (બંને સમાવિષ્ટ) ની જોગવાઈઓ અમલમાં આવશે.

(2)

કોર્પોરેટ બાબતોના મંત્રાલય, 19 ઓગસ્ટ, 2016ના રોજ, નોટી.નં.S.O.2746(E), ભારતના ગેઝેટમાં પ્રકાશિત, વધારાના., ભાગ II, વિભાગ 3(ii), તારીખ 19મી ઓગસ્ટ, 2016, P.2. નં.2064

નાદારી અને નાદારી સંહિતા, 2016 (31 નું 2016) ની કલમ I ની પેટા-કલમ (3) દ્વારા આપવામાં આવેલી સત્તાઓનો ઉપયોગ કરીને, કેન્દ્ર સરકાર આથી તારીખ 19મી ઓગસ્ટ, 2016 ની તરીકે નિમણૂક કરે છે કે જેના પર નીચેના વિભાગોની જોગવાઈઓ આ સંહિતા અમલમાં આવશે-

सूचनाएं (1)

कॉरपोरेट कार्य मंत्रालय, अधिसूचना संख्या एस.ओ.2618(ई), दिनांक 5 अगस्त, 2016, भारत के राजपत्र, अतिरिक्त, भाग II, खंड 3(ii), दिनांक 5 अगस्त, 2016, पी.1, संख्या में प्रकाशित .1949

दिवाला और दिवालियापन संहिता, 2016 (2016 का 31) की धारा I की उप-धारा (3) के प्रावधान द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केंद्र सरकार 5 अगस्त, 2016 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियुक्त करती है जिस दिन उक्त संहिता की धारा 188 से 194 (दोनों सम्मिलित) के प्रावधान लागू होंगे।

(2)

कॉरपोरेट कार्य मंत्रालय, अधिसूचना संख्या एस.ओ.2746(ई), दिनांक 19 अगस्त 2016, भारत के राजपत्र, अतिरिक्त, भाग II, खंड 3(ii), दिनांक 19 अगस्त, 2016, पृष्ठ 2 में प्रकाशित। क्रमांक 2064

दिवाला और दिवालियापन संहिता, 2016 (2016 का 31) की धारा I की उप-धारा (3) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केंद्र सरकार इसके द्वारा 19 अगस्त, 2016 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियुक्त करती है जिस पर निम्नलिखित धाराओं के प्रावधान लागू होते हैं उक्त संहिता लागू होगी-

Lawyers In Ahmedabad | 9925002031 |  Advocates In Ahmedabad

In Ahmedabad Gujarat, Advocate Paresh M Modi Is the Best Lawyer for DRT matters, Bank Loan Issues, Unpaid EMI Issues Credit Card bill Issues and Cheque Bounce Matters. he is the perfect Advocate for Criminal Cases, bail Matters, Family Matters and Land revenue matters including ancestral property disputes.

Author Advocate Paresh M Modi
Categories Cheque Bounce Lawyer, Criminal Lawyer

Top Cheque bounce lawyer in Ahmedabad | 9925002031 | Cheque Return Advocates Ahmedabad Gujarat | Advocate Paresh M Modi

Top Cheque bounce lawyer in Ahmedabad | 9925002031 | Cheque Return Advocates Ahmedabad Gujarat | Advocate Paresh M Modi

20. Inchoate stamped instruments:

where one person signs and delivers to another a paper stamped in accordance with the law relating to negotiable instruments then in force in India and either wholly blank or having written thereon an incomplete negotiable instrument, he thereby gives prima facie authority to the holder thereof to make or complete, as the case may be, upon it a negotiable instrument, for any amount specified therein and not exceeding the amount covered by the stamp. The person so signing shall be liable upon such instrument, in the capacity in which he signed the same, to any holder in due course for such amount: provided that no person other than a holder in due course shall recover from the person delivering the instrument anything in excess of the amount intended by him to be paid thereunder.

Bir Singh Vs. Mukesh kumar 2019 (1) G.L.H. 338.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881-Sections 20, 118(a),138, 139-Criminal Procedure code, 1973- Sections 243(2), 293-Cheque dishonored-Cheque given as security-Cheque Misused by complainant which is paid back-Section 118(a) or 139 of Act entitles to raise presumption-To Provide his evidence he must be given proper time-Accused be given opportunity to for adduce evidence in rebuttal thereof-Application filed by appellant under Section 243, Cr.P.C. he wrongly mentioned as Section 293, Cr.P.C for referring cheque in question for examination by Director, FSL for determining age of his signature-Court being master of proceedings must determine as to see whether application filed by accused in terms of Section 243(2), Cr.P.C. is bonafide or not and proposes to bring on record relevant material-Contention rejected by trial Judge and High Court considering appellant only having regard to provisions of Section 20 of Negotiable Instruments Act-By reason thereof-Accordingly instrument Subject to conditions-Application filed by appellant is bonafide-Challenged judgment is not sustainable-Therefore set aside.

Advocate Paresh M Modi is the Best Criminal Advocates well as Top Cheque Bounce Case Lawyer in Ahmedabad, Specially for NI Act Cases, Cheque Return Cases. Advocate Paresh M Modi is Practising in all Cities of Gujarat State, Specially he is working in Ahmedabad and at different areas like, Chandkheda, Sabarmati, Jawahar Chock, Keshavnagar, RTO Circle, Gandhi Ashram, Vadaj, New Vadaj, Bhimjipura, Akhbar nagar, KK nagar, Ghatlodia, Chanakyapuri, Sola, Shayona City, Naranpura, Navrangpura, Gurukul, CP nagar, Bhuyangdev, Usmanpura, Drivein, Science City, Satadhar, Memnagar, Nirnay Nagar, Chenpur, Kali Gaam, Zundal, Adalaj, IOC Road, Bhadaj Santej, Shilaj, Ambli, Bopal, Shilaj, Shela, Apple Wood, Godrej Garden City Ahmedabad, Adani Shantigram Ahmedabad, Krishna nagar, D-Cabin, Ramnagar Ahmedabad, Gujarat University, Ambawadi, Ashram Road, Income tax Circle, Nehru Bridge, Ellis Bridge, Paldi, Vasna, Shahibag, Ranip, Mithakhali, New Ranip, Dariapur, Kalupur, Shahpur, Station Road Ahmedabad, Ghee Kanta, Mirzapur Ahmedabad, Dafnala Ahmedabad, Airport Road, Sardar nagar, Kuber Nagar, Memco, Civil Hospital, Bapunagar, Gomtipur, Asarva, Prahladnagar, Makaraba, Satellite, Anand Nagar, Bodakdev, Vastrapur, Thaltej, Shilaj, Jodhpur, Ramdev nagar, Sindhu bhavan, Gota, Ognaj, Vande-Matram Circle, Tragad, Jagatpur, Motera, New CG Road, SG Road, Sarkhej, Juhapura, Kankaria, Maninagar, Ghodasar, Isanpur, Vatva, Ramol, Vastral, Odhav, Narol, Hathijan, Dehgam, Nikol, New Nikol, Naroda, New Naroda, SP Ring Road, Lambha, Aslali, GIDC Ahmedabad, Saijpur Bogha, Balol nagar,

Questions related to Cheque Bounce Case and Negotiable Instruments Act in India:

1. What is a cheque bounce case?
– A cheque bounce case occurs when a cheque presented for payment is dishonored by the bank due to insufficient funds or any other reason.

2. What is the legal recourse available for a bounced cheque?
– The legal recourse available is to file a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

3. What is the punishment for cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act?**
– The punishment includes imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with a fine which may extend to twice the amount of the cheque, or both.

4. What are the essential elements to prove under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act?
– The existence of a legally enforceable debt.
– Issuance of a cheque towards discharge of debt.
– Dishonor of the cheque.
– The recipient of the cheque serving a legal notice demanding payment within 30 days of the dishonor.
– Failure of the drawer to make the payment within 15 days of receiving the notice.

5. Is there a time limit for filing a complaint under Section 138?
– Yes, the complaint must be filed within one month of the date on which the cause of action arises.

6. Can a cheque bounce case be settled outside of court?
– Yes, the parties can mutually settle the matter outside of court before or after the filing of a complaint.

7. What is the procedure for filing a complaint under Section 138?
– The payee or holder of the cheque must issue a legal notice to the drawer demanding payment within 30 days of the dishonor.
– If the payment is not made within 15 days of receiving the notice, a complaint can be filed before the appropriate court having jurisdiction.

8. Can a company file a complaint for a bounced cheque?
– Yes, a company can file a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

9. Can a cheque bounce case be filed against a post-dated cheque?
– Yes, a cheque bounce case can be filed against a post-dated cheque if it is dishonored upon presentation.

10. Can a cheque bounce case be filed for a cheque issued as a gift or donation?
– No, a cheque bounce case cannot be filed for a cheque issued as a gift or donation as it lacks consideration.

11. Is there a provision for compoundable offenses under Section 138?
– Yes, with the consent of the payee and the court, the offense under Section 138 can be compounded.

12. Can a cheque bounce case be filed against a stale cheque?
– No, a cheque bounce case cannot be filed against a stale cheque as it is not legally enforceable.

13. What is the role of the court in a cheque bounce case?
– The court examines the evidence presented by both parties and decides whether the offense under Section 138 has been committed.

14. What defenses can be raised by the drawer in a cheque bounce case?
– Lack of consideration.
– Payment already made.
– Cheque issued as security.
– Dispute regarding the debt.

15. Can a cheque bounce case be filed for a cheque issued as a loan repayment installment?
– Yes, if the installment cheque is dishonored due to insufficient funds, a cheque bounce case can be filed.

16. What is the role of the bank in a cheque bounce case?
– The bank provides the dishonor memo and other relevant documents to the payee or holder of the cheque, which are essential for filing a complaint.

17. Can a cheque bounce case be filed if the cheque is dishonored due to signature mismatch?
– Yes, if the signature on the cheque does not match the specimen signature provided by the account holder, a cheque bounce case can be filed.

18. Can a cheque bounce case be filed for a cheque drawn on a closed account?
– Yes, issuing a cheque on a closed account amounts to an offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

19. Can a cheque bounce case be filed if the cheque is dishonored due to “payment stopped by drawer” reason?
– Yes, if the drawer issues instructions to the bank to stop payment on the cheque, and it is dishonored as a result, a cheque bounce case can be filed.

20. Can a cheque bounce case be filed for a cheque issued by a minor?
– No, a minor cannot be held liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

21. What is the limitation period for filing an appeal against the judgment in a cheque bounce case?
– The limitation period for filing an appeal is 30 days from the date of the judgment.

22. Can a cheque bounce case be filed if the cheque is dishonored due to technical reasons like overwriting?
– Yes, if the cheque is dishonored due to technical reasons like overwriting, a cheque bounce case can be filed.

23. Can a cheque bounce case be filed against a post-dated cheque presented before the date mentioned on it?
– No, a cheque bounce case cannot be filed if a post-dated cheque is presented before the date mentioned on it.

24. What is the difference between a civil and criminal remedy for a bounced cheque?
– Civil remedy involves recovering the amount through a summary suit, while criminal remedy involves filing a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

25. Can a cheque bounce case be filed if the cheque is dishonored due to insufficient funds after the re-presentation?
– Yes, if the cheque is dishonored again due to insufficient funds upon re-presentation, a cheque bounce case can be filed.

Cheque Dishonor Lawyer in Ahmedabad Gujarat| 9925002031 | Top cheque Bounce Lawyers In Gujarat India

કલમ:- 20 “સ્ટેમ્પવાળું અધરું ખત”:

વટાઉખત સંબંધી ભરતમાં તે સમયે અમલમાં હોય તેવા કાયદા અનુસાર સ્ટેમ્પવાળા કાગળ તદન કોરા રાખીને અથવા તેના ઉપર અધુરું વટાઉખત લખીને કોઇ એક વ્યકિત તેના ઉપર સહી કરીને બીજી વ્યકિતનેં સોપે ત્યારે તે વ્યકિત, તેથી તે કાગળના ધારકને તેના ઉપર વધુમાં વધુ તે સ્ટેમ્પની મર્યાદામાં હોય તેટલી અને તેમાં નિર્દિષ્ટ કરેલી રકમ તે યથાપ્રસંગ વટાઉખત બનાવવાનો અથવા પુરું કરવાનો પ્રથમ દર્શેને અધિકાર આપે છે એ રીતે સહી કરનાર વ્યકિતએ જે હેસિયતમાં વ્ટાઉખત ઉપર સહી કરી હોય તે હેસિયતમાં તે વ્યકિત, તે સિવાયની કોઇપણ વ્યકિત તે ખત સોપનાર વ્યકિત પાસેથી તે ખત હેઠળ જેટલી રકમ આપવાનો તેનો ઇરાદો હોય તેથી વધુ રકમ વસુલ કરી શકશે નહિં.

Bir Singh Vs. Mukesh kumar 2019 (1) G.L.H. 338.

વટાઉખત અધિનિયમ 1881, કલમ-20, 118(એ), 138,139-ફોજદારી કાર્યરીતી સંહિતા, 1973-કલમ-243(2),293-ચેકનો અસ્વીકાર થયો હતો-ચેક જામીનગીરી પેટે આપવામાં આવ્યો હતો- ચેકનો ફરિયાદ ધ્વારા દુરૂપયોગ કરવામાં આવેલો જેની પરત ચુકવણી કરવામાં આવી હતી-અધિનિયમની કલમ-118 (એ) અથવા 139 અનુમાન કરવા માટે હકદાર બનાવે છે-તેનો પુરાવો રજુ કરવાની તક આપવી જોઇએ-વિવાદી ધ્વારા ફોજદારી કાર્યરીતી સંહિતા, ની કલમ-243 હેઠળ અરજી કરવામાં આવી હતી-તેણે સવાલવાળા ચેકની ચકાસણી માટે નિર્દેશક, એફ.એસ.એલ. ને સહીના સમયગાળો નક્કી કરવાના હેતુસર માટે મોકલવા બાબતની અરજીમાં ભુલથી ફોજદારી કાર્યરીતી સંહિતા ની કલમ-293 નો ઉલ્લેખ કર્યો હતો- અદાલત કાર્યવાહીની નિષ્ણાત હોવાથી તેણે એ જોઇને નકકી કરવું ફરજીયાત છે કે શું આરોપી ધ્વારા ફોજદારી કાર્યરીતી સંહિતા ની કલમ 243(2) હેઠળ કરવામાં આવેલ અરજી શુધ્ધબુધ્ધિ પુર્વકની છે કે નહી અને તે સંબંધીત સામગ્રીને રેકોર્ડ પર લાવવા માંગે છે-મુકદમા ન્યાયાધીશે વિવાદ નામંજુર કરેલો અને વિવાદ અરજીને માત્ર વટાઉખત અધિનિયમની કલમ-20 હેઠળની જોગવાઇઓ પુરતી જ ધ્યાને લીધેલી-જેના કારણોસર તે કરવામાં આવી હતી-તે પ્રમાણે વટાઉખત શરતોને આધીન છે-વિવાદી ધ્વારા કરવામાં આવેલ અરજી શુધ્ધબુધ્ધિ પુર્વકની છે-પડકારવામાં આવેલ ચુકાદો ટકવાપાત્ર નથી-તેણી તેને રદ કરવામાં આવ્યો.

Cheque Bounce Lawyer in Ahmedabad | 9925002031

अहमदाबाद में चेक बाउंस वकील | 9925002031

અમદાવાદમાં ચેક બાઉન્સ વકીલ | 9925002031

 আহমেদাবাদে চেক বাউন্স আইনজীবী | 9925002031

अहमदाबादमधील चेक बाऊन्स वकील | 9925002031

అహ్మదాబాద్‌లో చెక్ బౌన్స్ లాయర్ | 9925002031

அகமதாபாத்தில் செக் பவுன்ஸ் வழக்கறிஞர் | 9925002031

ಅಹಮದಾಬಾದ್‌ನಲ್ಲಿ ಚೆಕ್ ಬೌನ್ಸ್ ವಕೀಲರು | 9925002031

Advocate Paresh M Modi, Ahmedabad Gujarat is the Top Cheque Bounce Case Lawyer in Ahmedabad. he has a team of Best Cheque Return Advocates in Ahmedabad, At any stage of the cheque return case, he may change the case in your favour. Advocate Paresh M Modi is taking care of Criminal Cases, Cheque Bounce Cases, Family Matters, Civil Matters and Property Disputes, Call Or WhatsApp SMS on Mobile No. 9925002031 to book the Appointment of him.

If you want to know the basic details of the above subject, you may find the 3-4 minutes you tube video of Advocate Paresh M Modi by clicking the given link below,

Author Advocate Paresh M Modi
Categories Cheque Bounce Lawyer

Understanding Cheque Bounce Cases and the Role of a Cheque Bounce Lawyer | 9925002031 | Cheque Return Advocate in Ahmedabad | Advocate Paresh M Modi

Cheque Bounce Lawyer:

A Cheque Bounce Lawyer is a legal professional who specializes in Cheque Bounce cases. Cheque Bounce is a criminal offense in India, and the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, governs the legal aspects of Cheque Bounce cases. A Cheque Bounce Lawyer can assist you in understanding the legal implications of Cheque Bounce, and the options available to you.

If you are a victim of Cheque Bounce, a Cheque Bounce Lawyer can help you file a Cheque Bounce case against the issuer of the cheque. They can represent you in court proceedings and help you recover the amount due along with any penalty and interest.

If you have been accused of issuing a bounced cheque, a Cheque Bounce Lawyer can help you defend yourself in court. They can advise you on the legal options available to you and represent you in court proceedings. They can also help you negotiate a settlement with the payee if possible.

Cheque Bounce cases:

Cheque Bounce cases are initiated by the payee against the issuer of a bounced cheque. The payee must prove that they had a legally enforceable debt or liability against the issuer of the cheque, and that the cheque was dishonored due to insufficient funds in the account or any other reason.

The payee can file a Cheque Bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which provides for criminal liability in case of Cheque Bounce. The case can be filed in the court where the cheque was dishonored or where the payee has a registered office.

If the court finds the issuer guilty of issuing a bounced cheque, they may order them to pay the amount due along with any penalty and interest. The court may also impose imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with a fine which may extend to twice the amount of the cheque, or with both.

It’s important to note that Cheque Bounce cases can be time-consuming and expensive, and may require the assistance of a Cheque Bounce Lawyer. Therefore, it’s advisable to take appropriate measures to ensure that cheques issued or received by you are honored by the bank.

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a well-known Cheque Bounce Lawyer in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. He has extensive experience in handling Cheque Bounce cases and has represented clients in various courts across Gujarat.

Advocate Modi provides legal services related to all aspects of Cheque Bounce cases, including legal consultation, drafting of legal notices, filing of Cheque Bounce cases, and representation in court proceedings. He has a track record of successfully handling Cheque Bounce cases and helping clients recover the amount due along with any penalty and interest.

Advocate Modi also assists clients who have been accused of issuing a bounced cheque. He provides legal advice and representation in court proceedings, and helps clients negotiate a settlement with the payee if possible.

If you are facing a Cheque Bounce issue in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, and are in need of legal assistance, you can reach out to Advocate Paresh M Modi for expert guidance and representation.

Author Advocate Paresh M Modi