Author: Advocate Paresh M Modi

As a law firm, Advocate Paresh M Modi is having a team of expert Advocates who provide expert advice and guide the clients on the complicated issues of court proceedings in India. Our law firm has been advising clients to adopt a systematic approach as per the provisions of the law and the requirements of the statute. Being the Best Advocate in Ahmedabad, Advocate Paresh M Modi has been serving the clients according to the provisions of law as Advocate Paresh M Modi is an Experienced Lawyer in Gujarat.Paresh M Modi and his associates have been rendering excellent work owing to their experience in Gujarat High Court for more than 7 years together and having established themselves as a seasoned advocate in the High Court of Gujarat by dealing with various matters in a different fields. It has been made possible to see that the client in any corner of the State of Gujarat could get genuine legal advice and the presence of a lawyer on account of the association with Advocates in various cities of the State of Gujarat.

Categories Cheque Bounce Lawyer

Section:-139. Presumption in Favour of Holder

Section:-139. Presumption in Favour of holder:

It Shall be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, that the holder of a cheque received the cheque, of the nature referred to in section 138, for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt or other liability.

કલમ-૧૩૯. ચેકના ધારણકર્તાની તરફેણમાં અનુમાન:

વિરુધ્ધની હકીકત સાબિત ન થાય ત્યાં સુધી એવું માનવામાં આવશે કે તે ચેક ધારણ કરનારે તે ચેક કલમ-૧૩૮ માં દર્શાવ્યા મુજબ કોઇ દેવાના અથવા અન્ય જવાબદારીના પુરેપુરા અથવા તેના કોઇ ભાગમાંથી બોજ મુકત થવાના બદલામાં તે ચેક મેળવ્યો હશે.

: Comment:

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881- Presumption mandated u/s. 139 of N.I.Act, 1881 includes existence of legally enforceable debt or liability-Presump-tion can be rebutted by Accused by raising the defense-Initial Presumption favours the Complainant and also burden of proof lies on the Complainant-Initial burden of proof lies on the Complainant-Once proved-Open to Accused to prove non-existence of consideration-Court to examine direct evidence or from preponderance of probabilities that existence of consideration was improbable Reverse onus Clause u/s. 118 of N.I Act-Presumption available until the contrary is proved-Applicable to N.I matters subject of Law of Evidence-Presumption of Law.

:ટિપ્પણી:

વટાવખત અધિનિયમ, ૧૮૮૧- એન. આઇ. અધિનિયમ, ૧૮૮૧ ની કલમ ૧૩૯ હેઠળ કાયદેસરના આદેશનું અનુમાન દેવું અને જવાબદારીના અમલનું અસિતત્વ સમાયેલ-બચાવ ઉભો કરી આરોપી દ્રારા અનુમાન નકારી શકાય -શરૂઆતનું અનુમાન ફરિયાદ પક્ષની તરફેણ કરેલ અને સાબિત કરવાની જવાબદારી ફરિયાદ પક્ષ ઉપર પણ લાદેલ-શરૂઆતની સાબિત કરવાની જવાબદારી ફરિયાદ પક્ષ ઉપર લાદેલ-એક વખત સાબિત થયેલ-આરોપી માટે સાબિત કરવાનું ખુલ્લું છે કે ધ્યાનમાં લેવાનું અસિતત્વ ધરાવતું નથી- અદાલતે સીધા પુરાવા તપાસવા અથવા શકયતાનું અનુમાન કે ધ્યાનમાં લેવાની બાબતનું અસિતત્વ અયોગ્ય હતું-એન.આઇ. અધિનિયમની કલમ ૧૧૮ હેઠળના ખંડનો બોજો ઉલટાવેલ-સાબિત ન થાય ત્યાં સુધી અનુમાન મળી શકે છે- એન.આઇ.ની બાબતને પુરવાનો કાયદો લાગુ પડે- કાયદાનું અનુમાન.

Judgement:

Patel Jayantibhai Mafatlal Vs. The State of Gujarat 2018(3) GLH (N.O.C.) 3.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881-Section 139-Rebuttal-A burden on accused-Account books given in evidence-Both companies were sister con-cerns-One of them paid cheque to complainant, it was signed by other-No efforts made to prove Directors were seperate-Presumption must go in favour of holder of cheque.

Patel Jayantibhai Mafatlal Vs. The State of Gujarat 2018(3) GLH (N.O.C.) 3.

વટાઉખત અધિનિયમ ૧૮૮૧-કલમ ૧૩૯- રદિયો આપવાનું-આરોપી પર બોજો-હિસાબી ચોપડા પુરાવામાં આપ્યા-બંને કંપનીઓ (પરસ્પર સંકળાયેલી) હતી-એમાંથી એકે ફરીયાદીને ચેક આપ્યો અને બીજાએ સહી કરી-પુરવાર કરવાનો કોઇ પ્રયત્ન નહિ-ડિરેકટરો અલગ હતા-ચેક ધારકની તરફેણમાં અનુમાન થવું જોઇએ.

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly regarded advocate based in Ahmedabad, known for his expertise in criminal law. As a distinguished lawyer at the Gujarat High Court, he specializes in a wide range of legal matters, making him a sought-after professional in various areas of law. Some of his notable specializations include handling cases related to cheque bounce, property disputes, cybercrime, court marriages, divorces, debt recovery tribunals (DRT), FIR quashing, land revenue disputes, anticipatory bail, PASA (Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act), family law, civil law, and more. Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Author Advocate Paresh M Modi
Categories Legal Disputes

Section-14 : The Indian Evidence Act 1872

Section-14. Facts showing existence of state of mind, or of body or bodily feeling. — Facts showing the existence of any state of mind, such as intention, knowledge, good faith, negligence, rashness, ill-will or good-will towards any particular person, or showing the existence of any state of body or bodily feeling, are relevant, when the existence of any such state of mind or body or bodily feeling, is in issue or relevant.

Explanation 1. — A fact relevant as showing the existence of a relevant state of mind must show that the state of mind exists, not generally, but in reference to the particular matter in question.

Explanation 2. — But where, upon the trial of a person accused of an offence, the previous commission by the accused of an offence is relevant within the meaning of this section, the previous conviction of such person shall also be a relevant fact.

धारा 14 – मन या शरीर की दशा शारीरीक संवेदना का अस्तित्व दर्शित करने वाले तथ्य – मन की कोई भी दशा जैसे आशय, ज्ञान, सद्भाव, उपेक्षा, उतावलापन, किसी विशिष्ट व्यक्ति के प्रति वैमनस्य या सदिच्छा दर्शित करने वाले अथवा शरीर की या शारीरिक संवेदना की किसी दशा का अस्तित्व दर्शित करने वाले तथ्य तब सुसंगत हैं, जबकि ऐसा मन की या शरीर की या शारीरिक संवेदन की किसी ऐसी दशा का अस्तित्व विवाद्य या सुसंगत है।

स्पष्टीकरण 1 – जो तथ्य इस नाते सुसंगत है िकवह मन की सुसंगत दशा के अस्तित्व को दर्शित करता है, उससे यह दर्शित होना ही चाहिए कि मन की वह दशा साधारणतः नहीं, अपितु प्रश्नगत विशिष्ट विषय के बारे में, अस्तित्व में है।

स्पष्टीकरण 2 – किन्तु जब किसी अपराध के अभियुक्त व्यक्ति के विचार में इस धारा के अर्थ के अन्तर्गत उस अभियुक्त द्वारा किसी अपराध का कभी पहले किया जाता सुसंगत हो, तब व्यक्ति की पूर्व-दोषसिद्धि भी सुसंगत तथ्य होगी।

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly regarded advocate based in Ahmedabad, known for his expertise in criminal law. As a distinguished lawyer at the Gujarat High Court, he specializes in a wide range of legal matters, making him a sought-after professional in various areas of law. Some of his notable specializations include handling cases related to cheque bounce, property disputes, cybercrime, court marriages, divorces, debt recovery tribunals (DRT), FIR quashing, land revenue disputes, anticipatory bail, PASA (Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act), family law, civil law, and more. Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Author Advocate Paresh M Modi
Categories Legal Disputes

Section-118 Who May Testify : The Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Section-118 Who May Testify — All persons shall be competent to testify unless the Court considers that they are prevented from understanding the questions put to them, or from giving rational answers to those questions, by tender years, extreme old age, disease, whether of body or mind, or any other cause of the same kind.

118. कौन साक्ष्य दे सकेगा – सभी व्यक्ति साक्ष्य देने के लिए सक्षम होंगे, जब तक कि न्यायालय का यह विचार न हो कि कोमल वयस, अति वार्धक्य शरीर के या मन के राग या इसी प्रकार के किसी अन्य कारण से वे उनके किए गए प्रश्नों को समझने से या उन प्रश्नों के युक्तियुक्त उत्तर देने से निवारित है।

Explanation — A lunatic is not incompetent to testify, unless he is prevented by his lunacy from understanding the questions put to him and giving rational answers to them.

स्पष्टीकरण – कोई पागल व्यक्ति साक्षर देने के लिए सक्षम नहीं है, जब तक कि वह अपने पागलपन के कारण उससे किए गए प्रश्नों को समझने से या उनके युक्तिसंगत उत्तर देने से निवारित न हो।

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly regarded advocate based in Ahmedabad, known for his expertise in criminal law. As a distinguished lawyer at the Gujarat High Court, he specializes in a wide range of legal matters, making him a sought-after professional in various areas of law. Some of his notable specializations include handling cases related to cheque bounce, property disputes, cybercrime, court marriages, divorces, debt recovery tribunals (DRT), FIR quashing, land revenue disputes, anticipatory bail, PASA (Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act), family law, civil law, and more. Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Author Advocate Paresh M Modi
Categories Criminal Cases, Criminal Lawyer

Section 301 in The Indian Penal Code

Section 301 in The Indian Penal Code

301. Culpable homicide by causing death of person other than person whose death was intended.—If a person, by doing anything which he intends or knows to be likely to cause death, commits culpable homicide by causing the death of any person, whose death he neither intends nor knows himself to be likely to cause, the culpable homicide committed by the offender is of the description of which it would have been if he had caused the death of the person whose death he intended or knew himself to be likely to cause.

301 IPC जिस व्यक्ति की मृत्यु का इरादा था, उसके अलावा किसी अन्य व्यक्ति की मृत्यु कारित करके गैर इरादतन हत्या।

यदि कोई व्यक्ति ऐसा कुछ भी करता है जिसका वह इरादा करता है या जानता है कि मृत्यु का कारण बनना संभव है, किसी ऐसे व्यक्ति की मृत्यु का कारण बनता है, जिसकी मृत्यु का न तो वह इरादा रखता है और न ही खुद को होने की संभावना जानता है। अपराधी का वह विवरण है जिसके बारे में यह होता यदि वह उस व्यक्ति की मृत्यु का कारण बनता जिसकी मृत्यु का वह इरादा रखता था या खुद जानता था कि ऐसा करना संभव है।

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly regarded advocate based in Ahmedabad, known for his expertise in criminal law. As a distinguished lawyer at the Gujarat High Court, he specializes in a wide range of legal matters, making him a sought-after professional in various areas of law. Some of his notable specializations include handling cases related to cheque bounce, property disputes, cybercrime, court marriages, divorces, debt recovery tribunals (DRT), FIR quashing, land revenue disputes, anticipatory bail, PASA (Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act), family law, civil law, and more. Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Author Advocate Paresh M Modi
Categories Legal Disputes

Section-101 Burden of Proof : The Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Section-101 Burden of proof :-

Whoever desires any Court to give judgment as to any legal right or liability dependent on the existence of facts which he asserts, must prove that those facts exist. When a person is bound to prove the existence of any fact, it is said that the burden of proof lies on that person.
Illustration-

(a) A desires a Court to give judgment that B shall be punished for a crime which A says B has committed. A must prove that B has committed the crime.

(b) A desires a Court to give judgment that he is entitled to certain land in the possession of B, by reason of facts which he asserts, and which B denies, to be true. A must prove the existence of those facts.

101. सबूत का भार-

जो कोई न्यायालय से ये चाहता है कि वह ऐसे किसी विधिक अधिकार या दयित्व के बारे में निर्णय दे, जो उन तथ्यों के अस्तित्व पर निर्भर है, जिन्हें वह प्राक्ष्यात करता है, उसे साबित करना होगा कि उन तथ्यों का अस्तित्व है।जब कोई व्यक्ति किसी तथ्य का अस्तित्व साबित करने के लिए आबद्ध है तब यह कहा जाता है कि उस व्यक्ति पर सबूत का भार है।

दृष्टान्त-

(क) न्यायालय से चाहता है कि वह ख को उस अपराध के लिए दण्डित करने का निर्णय दे जिसके बारे में क कहता है कि वह ख ने किया है।क को यह साबित करना होगा कि ख ने वह अपराध किया है।

(ख) क न्यायालय से चाहता है कि न्यायालय उन तथ्यों के कारण, जिन के सत्य होने का वह प्राक्ष्यान और ख प्रत्याख्यान करता हैं यह निर्णय दे कि वह ख के कब्जे में की भूमि का हकदार है।क् को उन तथ्यों का अस्तित्व साबित करना होगा।

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly regarded advocate based in Ahmedabad, known for his expertise in criminal law. As a distinguished lawyer at the Gujarat High Court, he specializes in a wide range of legal matters, making him a sought-after professional in various areas of law. Some of his notable specializations include handling cases related to cheque bounce, property disputes, cybercrime, court marriages, divorces, debt recovery tribunals (DRT), FIR quashing, land revenue disputes, anticipatory bail, PASA (Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act), family law, civil law, and more. Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Author Advocate Paresh M Modi
1 … 45 46 47 48 49 … 52