Author: Advocate Paresh M Modi

As a law firm, Advocate Paresh M Modi is having a team of expert Advocates who provide expert advice and guide the clients on the complicated issues of court proceedings in India. Our law firm has been advising clients to adopt a systematic approach as per the provisions of the law and the requirements of the statute. Being the Best Advocate in Ahmedabad, Advocate Paresh M Modi has been serving the clients according to the provisions of law as Advocate Paresh M Modi is an Experienced Lawyer in Gujarat.Paresh M Modi and his associates have been rendering excellent work owing to their experience in Gujarat High Court for more than 7 years together and having established themselves as a seasoned advocate in the High Court of Gujarat by dealing with various matters in a different fields. It has been made possible to see that the client in any corner of the State of Gujarat could get genuine legal advice and the presence of a lawyer on account of the association with Advocates in various cities of the State of Gujarat.

Categories Advocate, Cheque Bounce Lawyer

अहमदाबाद में चेक बाउंस वकील | 9925002031 । Cheque Bounce Lawyer in Ahmedabad | Advocate Paresh M Modi

Cheque Bounce Lawyer in Ahmedabad Gujarat | 9925002031 | Cheque Dishonor Advocate in Ahmedabad Gujarat


Negotiable instrument Act 1881, Section 138, the ultimate solution of reduce the financial crime. As Crime is never accepted in society as well as financial crime is never accepted in business, relations and daily utility transections. As Indian laws are majorly followed to the British law thus in 1881 the negotiable instrument act came in to the force which has covered the cheques, Bill of Exchange and many more instruments in said act. A bill of exchange which is drawn upon a specified banker and payable on demand is called a cheque. A cheque bounces or is considered to be dishonored, when it is presented for payment but due to reasons like, insufficient balance in the account, stopped payment, Account Suspended, overwriting, expired validity of the cheque among various others reasons, the cheque cannot be cleared. Cheque bounce cases are some of the most common cases before courts in India with close to 40 lakh cheque bounce cases pending as per reports of the Supreme Court. A cheque bounce happens due to insufficient account balance, expired validity of cheque and overwriting among other reasons. The cases of cheque bounce are quite common that nearly 40 lakh cases are pending, claim Supreme Court reports. Here, you will get to know the legal rights involved in the cheque bounce cases. Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is the primary law in the context of cheque bounce cases. We have personally observed and analysis the rights and remedies existing in cheque bounce cases. These include the Complainant, accused, Summons, warrants, Non Bailable warrants, prosecuting attorneys, bail bonds, criminal defense Lawyers, magistrate judges, witnesses, Sometime FSL Department and many more. At all stages of the criminal process, a person got the complaint registered, then Court will issue the summons to the accused, if not present then court will issue the warrant than non bailable warrants, whenever the accused present either he has to confess his guilt or has to face further legal proceedings. The NI Act 1881, Section 138 provide a remedy to the people who made a personal or Business financial Transactions and get the assured instruments like cheque with malafide intense of the accused. Advocate Paresh M Modi is Cheque Bounce Lawyer in Ahmedabad having enough experience regarding NI Act 1881. Advocate Paresh M Modi is also the Best Advocate in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, Specialist of Negotiable Instrument Act 1881, Section 138. He is the Best Lawyer near me for Cheque Return Cases, Criminal Cases, Family Matters and Civil Matters in Ahmedabad, Gandhinagar, Nadiad, Anand, Baroda, Vadodara, Surat and other Small town of Gujarat State, Call Now: 9925002031.


Expertise:

As a Cheque Bounce advocates we have very good experience. we know how to do interpretation of each section of NI Act 1881, our professional team of Criminal lawyers knows how to file the complaint for Cheque Return Case and handle the Complainant, accused, Bank Officers, Postal Departments person, witnesses during the cross examination and also knows how to identified weak section of the Case like, contention of legal notice, Reply of notice, complaint and entire case facts. As a procedure People who are found to have violated a criminal statute — whether through their own confession by a “guilty” plea or as a result of a entire trial case, they can be punished through imprisonment up to 2 years with the fine of up to double amount of bounced cheque and other penalties may be imposed But in all situation our best cheque Dishonor lawyers are handling the matter and due to good experience, we have proven records of some benchmark cases of individuals and corporates.

At present we are taking care of number of companies and NBFC’s cheque bounce cases in Ahmedabad, Gandhinagar, Nadiad, Anand, Baroda, Vadodara, Surat and other Small cities of Gujarat State.


Offer:

As a Specialist lawyer of Cheque Bounce cases, Negotiable Instrument Act 1881, Section 138 cases, we are offering legal services in Gujarat for entire case handling for complainant as well as Accused. Our services begins from legal notice or Reply of legal notice for cheque bounce to final order of Hon’ble court as well as Accused. Except NI Act 138 cheque Return Cases, We do Bail Application – Appeal in session court and Gujarat High Court for different types of criminal cases like financial Fraud, Property cheating Murder prohibition PASA NDPS drug PMLA Act Case, Cyber-crime and other lots of crime.


Result or Benefits:

As per Advocates Act 1961, lawyers cannot give assurance and guaranty or warranty of result and time in any form but we assured that our clients will get good legal services from specialized Criminal lawyers and Advocates. They will get good guidance, perfect legal remedies as well as result oriented efforts of our team and thus our intelligent Advocates may be able to negotiate a compromise with the prosecution for the benefit of our client, As an experienced lawyers, we can give you the best options for your Criminal case and will defend you at trial Court, Session Court and High Court.



Legal Words and Definition



Cheque

A cheque is a negotiable instrument instructing a bank to pay a specific amount from an account holder’s funds to a designated party.


NI Act

The Negotiable Instruments Act governs financial instruments like cheques, including penalties for dishonor due to insufficient funds.


Cheque Return

Cheque return occurs when a bank declines to honor a cheque, often due to insufficient funds or signature mismatch.


Cheque Dishonour

Cheque dishonor happens when a cheque cannot be processed due to insufficient funds, stop payments, or other technical reasons.


Cheque Bounce

Cheque bounce refers to the non-fulfillment of a cheque’s payment, often leading to legal action under the Negotiable Instruments Act.


Plea

A plea is a formal statement made by an accused in court, declaring guilt, innocence, or a defense to charges.


Act

An act is a formal legislative statute passed by Parliament or a state assembly, providing rules, regulations, and procedures governing various matters.


Law

Law is the system of rules and guidelines established by society, enforced through institutions, to regulate conduct and ensure justice.


Section

A section is a distinct part of a legal statute or act, specifying particular rules, provisions, or guidelines within the larger framework of the law.


Jail

Jail is a facility for detaining individuals accused or convicted of crimes, serving as a correctional or pre-trial holding institution.


Magistrates

Magistrates are judicial officers responsible for administering justice in lower courts, handling minor cases, bail matters, and preliminary inquiries.


Judges

Judges preside over courts, interpreting laws, assessing evidence, and delivering judgments to ensure justice is served in legal disputes or cases.


Jamanat

Jamanat refers to bail or security deposited to ensure an accused person’s release from custody while guaranteeing their court appearances.


Complaint

A complaint is a formal legal statement filed by an individual or entity alleging wrongdoing or seeking redress for grievances.


Complainant

The complainant is the person or party who files a legal complaint, initiating proceedings against an accused person or entity.


Accused

An accused is an individual formally charged or suspected of committing a crime, pending trial or investigation to establish guilt or innocence.


Crime

Crime is any act or omission punishable by law, considered harmful to individuals, society, or the state, including theft, fraud, and assault.


Criminal

A criminal is an individual convicted of violating laws, having committed acts deemed punishable under the legal system.


Case

A case is a legal dispute or criminal matter brought before a court for resolution or judgment based on presented evidence and arguments.


Expert

An expert is a person with specialized knowledge or skills in a particular field, often called upon for advice or testimony in legal matters.


Specialist

A specialist is someone highly skilled or knowledgeable in a specific area of law, offering expert legal counsel or representation.


Top

Top refers to being at the highest rank or level in a given field, often used to describe leading lawyers or advocates with a successful track record.


Best

Best signifies unparalleled quality or excellence, frequently used for legal professionals known for exceptional expertise and success.


Near Me

“Near me” refers to finding local legal services or professionals in proximity for convenient access to legal assistance.


Appeal

An appeal is a formal request to a higher court to review and potentially overturn a lower court’s judgment or order.


Revision

Revision involves reviewing and rectifying procedural or jurisdictional errors in a lower court’s judgment or decision.


 

Frequently Asked Questions:


1. What is a negotiable instrument act and its types?

Ans. A negotiable instrument is a legal document written and signed by one party to ensure it will pay or repay the required amount within a specific time range or on-demand. It is transferable, and an individual or entity has the liberty to decide whether they want to encase it or transfer it to consecutive payees.

2. Is there bail for cheque bounce case?

Ans. Dear client, There is no anticipatory bail for offence under cheque dishonor. The offence is a bailable offence. The parameters to be considered is when the cheque was issued, when was it presented in the bank and the burden to prove the transaction lies with the complainant.

3. What is the time limit to file the cheque bounce case?

Ans. As per Negotiable Instruments Act, legal notice must be sent within 30 days from the date of cheque bounce. Thereafter within 15+30=45 days from the date of sending the legal notice, case must be filed. In case the case is filed beyond that time then the same shall be time barred.

4. Who is the best Lawyer for Bounced Cheque in Ahmedabad?

Ans. Advocate Paresh M Modi is the best lawyer in Ahmedabad for cheque bounce cases (Negotiable instrument act 1881).

5. As an Accused, to whom I have to be consult for my NI Act cheque Bounce Case in Gujarat State?

Ans. If really you want to defend your case as an Accused, you must consult the Advocate Paresh M Modi for your complicated criminal Case of NI Act section 138.


અમદાવાદ ગુજરાતમાં ચેક બાઉન્સ વકીલ | 9925002031 | અમદાવાદ ગુજરાતમાં ચેક રિટર્ન એડવોકેટ | Advocate Paresh M Modi


નેગોશિયેબલ ઇન્સ્ટ્રુમેન્ટ એક્ટ 1881, કલમ 138, નાણાકીય ગુના ઘટાડવાનો અંતિમ ઉકેલ. જેમ ગુનાને સમાજમાં ક્યારેય સ્વીકારવામાં આવતો નથી તેમ જ વ્યવસાય, સંબંધો અને રોજિંદા ઉપયોગિતાના વ્યવહારોમાં પણ આર્થિક ગુના ક્યારેય સ્વીકારવામાં આવતા નથી. ભારતીય કાયદાઓ મોટાભાગે બ્રિટિશ કાયદાને અનુસરવામાં આવે છે તેથી 1881 માં નેગોશિયેબલ ઇન્સ્ટ્રુમેન્ટ એક્ટ (વટાઉ ખત અધિનિયમ ) અમલમાં આવ્યો જેમાં ચેક, બિલ ઓફ એક્સચેન્જ અને આ અધિનિયમમાં ઘણા વધુ ખત સાધનો આવરી લેવામાં આવ્યા હતા. વિનિમયનું બિલ જે ચોક્કસ બેંકર પર દોરવામાં આવે છે અને માંગ પર ચૂકવવાપાત્ર હોય છે તેને ચેક કહેવામાં આવે છે. જ્યારે તેને ચૂકવણી માટે રજૂ કરવામાં આવે છે ત્યારે ચેક બાઉન્સ થાય છે અથવા તેને અપમાનિત ગણવામાં આવે છે પરંતુ, ખાતામાં અપૂરતી બેલેન્સ, ચૂકવણી અટકાવી દેવાઈ, એકાઉન્ટ સસ્પેન્ડ, ઓવરરાઈટીંગ, ચેકની સમયસીમા સમાપ્ત થઈ ગઈ હોવા જેવા અન્ય કારણોને લીધે ચેક બાઉન્સ કરી શકાતો નથી. સુપ્રિમ કોર્ટના અહેવાલો અનુસાર ચેક બાઉન્સના કેસો ભારતની અદાલતો સમક્ષના સૌથી સામાન્ય કેસોમાંના 40 લાખ જેટલા ચેક બાઉન્સ કેસ પેન્ડિંગ છે. એકાઉન્ટમાં અપૂરતું બેલેન્સ, ચેકની સમયસીમા સમાપ્ત થઈ ગયેલી માન્યતા અને અન્ય કારણોસર ઓવરરાઈટીંગને કારણે ચેક બાઉન્સ થાય છે. ચેક બાઉન્સના કિસ્સાઓ એકદમ સામાન્ય છે કે લગભગ 40 લાખ કેસો પેન્ડિંગ છે, એવો દાવો સુપ્રીમ કોર્ટના અહેવાલમાં કરવામાં આવ્યો છે. અહીં, તમે ચેક બાઉન્સના કેસમાં સંકળાયેલા કાનૂની અધિકારો વિશે જાણી શકશો. નેગોશિયેબલ ઇન્સ્ટ્રુમેન્ટ્સ એક્ટ, 1881ની કલમ 138 એ ચેક બાઉન્સ કેસના સંદર્ભમાં પ્રાથમિક કાયદો છે. અમે વ્યક્તિગત રીતે ચેક બાઉન્સ કેસમાં અસ્તિત્વમાં રહેલા અધિકારો અને ઉપાયોનું અવલોકન અને વિશ્લેષણ કર્યું છે. આમાં ફરિયાદી, આરોપી, સમન્સ, વોરંટ, બિનજામીનપાત્ર વોરંટ, પ્રોસીક્યુટીંગ એટર્ની, જામીન બોન્ડ, ફોજદારી બચાવ વકીલો, મેજીસ્ટ્રેટ ન્યાયાધીશો, સાક્ષીઓ, ક્યારેક એફએસએલ વિભાગ અને ઘણા બધાનો સમાવેશ થાય છે. ફોજદારી પ્રક્રિયાના તમામ તબક્કે, વ્યક્તિએ ફરિયાદ નોંધી છે, પછી કોર્ટ આરોપીને સમન્સ ઇશ્યૂ કરશે, જો હાજર ન થાય તો કોર્ટ બિન-જામીનપાત્ર વોરંટ કરતાં વોરંટ ઇશ્યૂ કરશે, જ્યારે પણ આરોપી હાજર હોય ત્યારે તેણે પોતાનો ગુનો કબૂલ કરવો પડશે. અથવા આગળ કાનૂની કાર્યવાહીનો સામનો કરવો પડશે. NI એક્ટ 1881, કલમ 138 એવા લોકોને ઉપાય પૂરો પાડે છે કે જેમણે વ્યક્તિગત અથવા વ્યાપારી નાણાકીય વ્યવહારો કર્યા છે અને આરોપીની ખરાબી સાથે તપાસ કરવા જેવા ખાતરીપૂર્વકના સાધનો મેળવ્યા છે. એડવોકેટ પરેશ એમ મોદી અમદાવાદમાં ચેક બાઉન્સ વકીલ છે તેઓ એનઆઈ એક્ટ 1881 અંગે પૂરતો અનુભવ ધરાવે છે.


એડવોકેટ પરેશ એમ મોદી નેગોશિયેબલ ઇન્સ્ટ્રુમેન્ટ એક્ટ 1881, કલમ 138ના નિષ્ણાત એડવોકેટ છે. તેઓ ચેક રિટર્ન કેસ, ફોજદારી કેસ, કૌટુંબિક બાબતો અને સિવિલ મેટર્સ માટે મારી નજીકના શ્રેષ્ઠ વકીલ છે. તેઓ અમદાવાદ ગાંધીનગર નડિયાદ આણંદ બરોડા વડોદરા સુરત અને ગુજરાત રાજ્યના અન્ય નાના શહેરો સહિત સમગ્ર ગુજરાતનાં શ્રેષ્ઠ વકીલ છે, હવે કૉલ કરો: 9925002031.


નિપુણતા:

ચેક બાઉન્સના વકીલ તરીકે અમારી પાસે ખૂબ જ સારો અનુભવ છે. અમે જાણીએ છીએ કે NI એક્ટ 1881 ના દરેક વિભાગનું અર્થઘટન કેવી રીતે કરવું, ફોજદારી વકીલોની અમારી વ્યાવસાયિક ટીમ જાણે છે કે ચેક રિટર્ન કેસ માટે ફરિયાદ કેવી રીતે ફાઇલ કરવી અને ફરિયાદી, આરોપી, બેંક અધિકારીઓ, પોસ્ટલ વિભાગના વ્યક્તિ, ઊલટતપાસ દરમિયાન સાક્ષીઓ અને તે પણ જાણે છે કે કેસના નબળા વિભાગને કેવી રીતે ઓળખી શકાય જેમ કે, કાનૂની નોટિસનો વિવાદ, નોટિસનો જવાબ, ફરિયાદ અને સમગ્ર કેસની હકીકત. એક પ્રક્રિયા તરીકે જે લોકોએ ફોજદારી કાનૂનનું ઉલ્લંઘન કર્યું હોવાનું જણાયું છે – પછી ભલે તે “દોષિત” અરજી દ્વારા તેમની પોતાની કબૂલાત દ્વારા અથવા સમગ્ર ટ્રાયલ કેસના પરિણામે, તેઓને દંડ સાથે 2 વર્ષ સુધીની જેલની સજા થઈ શકે છે. બાઉન્સ થયેલા ચેકની બમણી રકમ અને અન્ય દંડ લાદવામાં આવી શકે છે પરંતુ તમામ પરિસ્થિતિમાં અમારા શ્રેષ્ઠ ચેક ડિસઓનર વકીલો આ બાબતને સંભાળી રહ્યા છે અને સારા અનુભવને કારણે, અમે વ્યક્તિઓ અને કોર્પોરેટ્સના કેટલાક બેન્ચમાર્ક કેસોના રેકોર્ડ સાબિત કર્યા છે. હાલમાં અમે અમદાવાદ, ગાંધીનગર, નડિયાદ, આણંદ, બરોડા, વડોદરા, સુરત અને ગુજરાત રાજ્યના અન્ય નાના શહેરોમાં સંખ્યાબંધ કંપનીઓ અને NBFC ના ચેક બાઉન્સ કેસોની કાળજી લઈ રહ્યા છીએ.


ઓફર:

નેગોશિયેબલ ઇન્સ્ટ્રુમેન્ટ એક્ટ 1881, કલમ 138 કેસના નિષ્ણાત વકીલ તરીકે, અમે ફરિયાદી માટે સમગ્ર કેસ હેન્ડલિંગ માટે કાનૂની સેવાઓ પ્રદાન કરીએ છીએ. અમારી સેવાઓ કાનૂની નોટિસ અથવા ચેક બાઉન્સ માટે કાનૂની નોટિસના જવાબથી માનનીય કોર્ટ તેમજ આરોપીઓના અંતિમ આદેશ સુધી શરૂ થાય છે. NI એક્ટ 138 ચેક રિટર્ન કેસ સિવાય, અમે જામીન અરજી કરીએ છીએ – નાણાકીય છેતરપિંડી, મિલકત છેતરપિંડી હત્યા, દારુ પ્રતિબંધ, સાયબર-ક્રાઇમ અને અન્ય ઘણા ગુનાઓ જેવા વિવિધ પ્રકારના ફોજદારી કેસ માટે સેશન કોર્ટ અને ગુજરાત હાઇકોર્ટમાં અપીલ કરીએ છીએ.


પરિણામ અથવા લાભો:

એડવોકેટ્સ એક્ટ 1961 મુજબ, વકીલો કોઈપણ સ્વરૂપમાં પરિણામ અને સમયની ખાતરી અને ગેરંટી અથવા વોરંટી આપી શકતા નથી પરંતુ અમે ખાતરી આપી છે કે અમારા ગ્રાહકોને વિશિષ્ટ ક્રિમિનલ વકીલો અને એડવોકેટ્સ પાસેથી સારી કાનૂની સેવાઓ મળશે. તેઓને સારું માર્ગદર્શન, સંપૂર્ણ કાનૂની ઉપાયો તેમજ અમારી ટીમના પરિણામલક્ષી પ્રયાસો મળશે અને આ રીતે અમારા બુદ્ધિશાળી વકીલો અમારા ક્લાયન્ટના ફાયદા માટે પ્રોસિક્યુશન સાથે સમાધાન માટે વાટાઘાટ કરી શકશે, એક અનુભવી વકીલ તરીકે અમે તમને આના પર વિશ્વાસ મૂકી શકીશું. તમારા ફોજદારી કેસ માટે શ્રેષ્ઠ વિકલ્પો અને ટ્રાયલ કોર્ટ, સેશન કોર્ટ અને હાઈકોર્ટમાં તમારો બચાવ કરશે.


વારંવાર પૂછાતા પ્રશ્નો:


1. નેગોશિયેબલ ઇન્સ્ટ્રુમેન્ટ એક્ટ અને તેના પ્રકાર શું છે?

જવાબ:- નેગોશિયેબલ ઇન્સ્ટ્રુમેન્ટ એ કાનૂની દસ્તાવેજ છે જે એક પક્ષ દ્વારા લખાયેલ અને સહી થયેલ છે તેની ખાતરી કરવા માટે કે તે ચોક્કસ સમય મર્યાદામાં અથવા માંગ પર જરૂરી રકમ ચૂકવશે અથવા ચૂકવશે. તે સ્થાનાંતરિત કરી શકાય છે, અને વ્યક્તિ અથવા એન્ટિટીને તે નક્કી કરવાની સ્વતંત્રતા છે કે તેઓ તેને એન્કેસ કરવા માંગે છે અથવા તેને સળંગ ચૂકવનારાઓને સ્થાનાંતરિત કરવા માંગે છે.

2. ચેક બાઉન્સ કેસ માટે જામીન છે?

જવાબ :- પ્રિય ગ્રાહક, ચેક અપમાન હેઠળના ગુના માટે કોઈ આગોતરા જામીન નથી. આ ગુનો જામીનપાત્ર ગુનો છે. ધ્યાનમાં લેવાના પરિમાણો એ છે કે ચેક ક્યારે જારી કરવામાં આવ્યો હતો, તે બેંકમાં ક્યારે રજૂ કરવામાં આવ્યો હતો અને વ્યવહાર સાબિત કરવાનો બોજ ફરિયાદી પર છે.

3. ચેક બાઉન્સ કેસ ફાઇલ કરવાની સમય મર્યાદા કેટલી છે?

જવાબ:- નેગોશિયેબલ ઇન્સ્ટ્રુમેન્ટ એક્ટ મુજબ, ચેક બાઉન્સ થયાની તારીખથી 30 દિવસની અંદર કાનૂની નોટિસ મોકલવી આવશ્યક છે. ત્યારબાદ કાનૂની નોટિસ મોકલ્યાની તારીખથી 15+30=45 દિવસની અંદર કેસ દાખલ કરવો આવશ્યક છે. જો તે સમય કરતાં વધુ કેસ દાખલ કરવામાં આવે તો તે જ સમય પ્રતિબંધિત રહેશે.

4. અમદાવાદમાં બાઉન્સ ચેક માટે શ્રેષ્ઠ વકીલ કોણ છે?

જવાબ:- એડવોકેટ પરેશ એમ મોદી ચેક બાઉન્સના કેસ છે (નેગોશિયેબલ ઇન્સ્ટ્રુમેન્ટ એક્ટ 1881) માટે અમદાવાદના શ્રેષ્ઠ વકીલ છે.

5. આરોપી તરીકે, ગુજરાત રાજ્યમાં મારા NI એક્ટ ચેક બાઉન્સ કેસ માટે મારે કોની સલાહ લેવી પડશે?

જવાબ:- જો તમે ખરેખર તમારા કેસનો આરોપી તરીકે બચાવ કરવા માંગતા હો, તો તમારે NI એક્ટ કલમ 138ના તમારા જટિલ ફોજદારી કેસ માટે એડવોકેટ પરેશ એમ મોદીનો સંપર્ક કરવો જ જોઇએ.


अहमदाबाद गुजरात में चेक बाउंस वकील | 9925002031 | अहमदाबाद गुजरात में चेक डिसऑनर एडवोकेट |Advocate Paresh M Modi


परक्राम्य लिखत अधिनियम 1881, धारा 138, वित्तीय अपराध को कम करने का अंतिम समाधान। जिस प्रकार अपराध को समाज में कभी स्वीकार नहीं किया जाता है, उसी प्रकार वित्तीय अपराध को व्यापार, संबंधों और दैनिक उपयोगिता लेनदेन में कभी स्वीकार नहीं किया जाता है। चूंकि भारतीय कानून मुख्य रूप से ब्रिटिश कानून का पालन करते हैं, इसलिए 1881 में परक्राम्य लिखत अधिनियम लागू हुआ, जिसमें चेक, बिल ऑफ एक्सचेंज और कई अन्य लिखतों को उक्त अधिनियम में शामिल किया गया है। विनिमय का एक बिल जो एक निर्दिष्ट बैंकर पर लिखा जाता है और मांग पर देय होता है उसे चेक कहा जाता है। जब कोई चेक भुगतान के लिए प्रस्तुत किया जाता है तो वह बाउंस हो जाता है या अनादरित माना जाता है, लेकिन खाते में अपर्याप्त शेष राशि, रुका हुआ भुगतान, खाता निलंबित, ओवरराइटिंग, चेक की वैधता समाप्त होने जैसे कई अन्य कारणों के कारण, चेक चेक नहीं किया जा सकता है। साफ़ किया गया. चेक बाउंस के मामले भारत की अदालतों में सबसे आम मामलों में से कुछ हैं, सुप्रीम कोर्ट की रिपोर्ट के अनुसार करीब 40 लाख चेक बाउंस मामले लंबित हैं। चेक बाउंस अपर्याप्त अकाउंट बैलेंस, चेक की वैधता समाप्त होने और ओवरराइटिंग समेत अन्य कारणों से होता है। सुप्रीम कोर्ट की रिपोर्ट का दावा है कि चेक बाउंस के मामले काफी आम हैं, लगभग 40 लाख मामले लंबित हैं। यहां, आपको चेक बाउंस मामलों से जुड़े कानूनी अधिकारों के बारे में पता चलेगा। परक्राम्य लिखत अधिनियम, 1881 की धारा 138 चेक बाउंस मामलों के संदर्भ में प्राथमिक कानून है। हमने चेक बाउंस मामलों में मौजूद अधिकारों और उपायों का व्यक्तिगत रूप से अवलोकन और विश्लेषण किया है। इनमें शिकायतकर्ता, आरोपी, समन, वारंट, गैर जमानती वारंट, अभियोजन पक्ष के वकील, जमानत बांड, आपराधिक बचाव वकील, मजिस्ट्रेट न्यायाधीश, गवाह, कभी-कभी एफएसएल विभाग और कई अन्य शामिल हैं। आपराधिक प्रक्रिया के सभी चरणों में, किसी व्यक्ति ने शिकायत दर्ज कराई है, तो अदालत आरोपी को समन जारी करेगी, यदि उपस्थित नहीं है तो अदालत गैर जमानती वारंट की तुलना में वारंट जारी करेगी, जब भी आरोपी उपस्थित होगा या तो उसे अपना अपराध कबूल करना होगा या आगे की कानूनी कार्यवाही का सामना करना पड़ेगा। एनआई अधिनियम 1881, धारा 138 उन लोगों के लिए एक उपाय प्रदान करती है जिन्होंने व्यक्तिगत या व्यावसायिक वित्तीय लेनदेन किया है और आरोपी के दुर्भावनापूर्ण इरादे वाले चेक जैसे सुनिश्चित साधन प्राप्त करते हैं।


एडवोकेट परेश एम मोदी अहमदाबाद में चेक बाउंस वकील हैं, जिनके पास एनआई एक्ट 1881 के संबंध में पर्याप्त अनुभव है। एडवोकेट परेश एम मोदी अहमदाबाद, गुजरात में सर्वश्रेष्ठ वकील भी हैं, परक्राम्य लिखत अधिनियम 1881, धारा 138 के विशेषज्ञ हैं। वह मेरे लिए सबसे अच्छे वकील हैं। अहमदाबाद, गांधीनगर, नडियाद, आनंद, बड़ौदा, वडोदरा, सूरत और गुजरात राज्य के अन्य छोटे शहरों में रिटर्न मामले, आपराधिक मामले, पारिवारिक मामले और नागरिक मामले देखें, अभी कॉल करें: 9925002031


विशेषज्ञता:

चेक बाउंस के वकील के रूप में हमारे पास बहुत अच्छा अनुभव है। हम जानते हैं कि एनआई अधिनियम 1881 की प्रत्येक धारा की व्याख्या कैसे करनी है, आपराधिक वकीलों की हमारी पेशेवर टीम जानती है कि चेक रिटर्न मामले के लिए शिकायत कैसे दर्ज की जाए और जिरह के दौरान शिकायतकर्ता, आरोपी, बैंक अधिकारी, डाक विभाग के व्यक्ति, गवाहों को कैसे संभाला जाए। यह भी जानता है कि मामले के कमजोर हिस्से की पहचान कैसे की जाए, जैसे कानूनी नोटिस का विवाद, नोटिस का जवाब, शिकायत और पूरे मामले के तथ्य। एक प्रक्रिया के रूप में जो लोग किसी आपराधिक क़ानून का उल्लंघन करते हुए पाए जाते हैं – चाहे वह “दोषी” याचिका द्वारा अपने स्वयं के कबूलनामे के माध्यम से या पूरे मुकदमे के परिणामस्वरूप, उन्हें 2 साल तक की कैद और जुर्माने से दंडित किया जा सकता है। चेक बाउंस होने पर राशि दोगुनी करने के साथ अन्य जुर्माना भी लगाया जा सकता है।लेकिन सभी स्थितियों में हमारे सर्वश्रेष्ठ चेक डिसऑनर वकील इस मामले को संभाल रहे हैं और अच्छे अनुभव के कारण, हमारे पास व्यक्तियों और कॉरपोरेट्स के कुछ बेंचमार्क मामलों के सिद्ध रिकॉर्ड हैं। वर्तमान में हम अहमदाबाद, गांधीनगर, नडियाद, आनंद, बड़ौदा, वडोदरा, सूरत और गुजरात राज्य के अन्य छोटे शहरों में कई कंपनियों और एनबीएफसी के चेक बाउंस मामलों की देखभाल कर रहे हैं।


प्रस्ताव:

चेक बाउंस मामलों, परक्राम्य लिखत अधिनियम 1881, धारा 138 मामलों के विशेषज्ञ वकील के रूप में, हम शिकायतकर्ता के साथ-साथ अभियुक्तों के लिए पूरे मामले को संभालने के लिए गुजरात में कानूनी सेवाएं प्रदान कर रहे हैं। हमारी सेवाएँ कानूनी नोटिस या चेक बाउंस के लिए कानूनी नोटिस के जवाब से लेकर माननीय न्यायालय के साथ-साथ अभियुक्त के अंतिम आदेश तक शुरू होती हैं। एनआई अधिनियम 138 चेक रिटर्न मामलों को छोड़कर, हम जमानत आवेदन करते हैं – विभिन्न प्रकार के आपराधिक मामलों जैसे वित्तीय धोखाधड़ी, संपत्ति धोखाधड़ी, हत्या निषेध, पीएएसए एनडीपीएस दवा पीएमएलए अधिनियम मामले, साइबर अपराध और अन्य बहुत सारे अपराध के लिए सत्र न्यायालय और गुजरात उच्च न्यायालय में अपील करते हैं।


परिणाम या लाभ:

अधिवक्ता अधिनियम 1961 के अनुसार, वकील किसी भी रूप में परिणाम और समय का आश्वासन और गारंटी नहीं दे सकते हैं, लेकिन हमने आश्वासन दिया है कि हमारे ग्राहकों को विशेष आपराधिक वकीलों और अधिवक्ताओं से अच्छी कानूनी सेवाएं मिलेंगी। उन्हें अच्छा मार्गदर्शन, सही कानूनी उपचार के साथ-साथ हमारी टीम के परिणामोन्मुख प्रयास मिलेंगे और इस प्रकार हमारे बुद्धिमान वकील हमारे ग्राहक के लाभ के लिए अभियोजन पक्ष के साथ समझौता करने में सक्षम हो सकते हैं, एक अनुभवी वकील के रूप में, हम आपको दे सकते हैं। आपके आपराधिक मामले के लिए सर्वोत्तम विकल्प और ट्रायल कोर्ट, सत्र न्यायालय और उच्च न्यायालय में आपका बचाव करेगा।


अक्सर पूछे जाने वाले प्रश्नों:


1. परक्राम्य लिखत अधिनियम क्या है और इसके प्रकार?

उत्तर. एक परक्राम्य लिखत एक कानूनी दस्तावेज है जिसे एक पक्ष द्वारा लिखा और हस्ताक्षरित किया जाता है ताकि यह सुनिश्चित किया जा सके कि वह एक विशिष्ट समय सीमा के भीतर या मांग पर आवश्यक राशि का भुगतान या पुनर्भुगतान करेगा। यह हस्तांतरणीय है, और किसी व्यक्ति या संस्था को यह तय करने की स्वतंत्रता है कि वे इसे संलग्न करना चाहते हैं या इसे लगातार भुगतानकर्ताओं को हस्तांतरित करना चाहते हैं।

2. क्या चेक बाउंस मामले में जमानत मिलती है?

उत्तर. प्रिय ग्राहक, चेक अनादर के तहत अपराध के लिए कोई अग्रिम जमानत नहीं है। यह अपराध एक जमानती अपराध है। विचार किए जाने वाले पैरामीटर यह हैं कि चेक कब जारी किया गया था, इसे बैंक में कब प्रस्तुत किया गया था और लेनदेन को साबित करने का भार शिकायतकर्ता पर है।

3. चेक बाउंस केस दर्ज करने की समय सीमा क्या है?

उत्तर. परक्राम्य लिखत अधिनियम के अनुसार, चेक बाउंस की तारीख से 30 दिनों के भीतर कानूनी नोटिस भेजा जाना चाहिए। इसके बाद कानूनी नोटिस भेजने की तारीख से 15+30=45 दिनों के भीतर मुकदमा दायर करना होगा। यदि उस समय से अधिक समय तक मामला दायर किया जाता है तो उसे कालातीत कर दिया जाएगा।

4. अहमदाबाद में बाउंस चेक के लिए सबसे अच्छा वकील कौन है?

उत्तर. एडवोकेट परेश एम मोदी चेक बाउंस मामलों (नेगोशिएबल इंस्ट्रूमेंट एक्ट 1881) के लिए अहमदाबाद में सबसे अच्छे वकील हैं।

5. एक अभियुक्त के रूप में, मुझे गुजरात राज्य में अपने एनआई एक्ट चेक बाउंस मामले के लिए किससे परामर्श लेना होगा?

उत्तर. यदि आप वास्तव में एक अभियुक्त के रूप में अपने मामले का बचाव करना चाहते हैं, तो आपको एनआई अधिनियम धारा 138 के अपने जटिल आपराधिक मामले के लिए वकील परेश एम मोदी से परामर्श लेना चाहिए।


 

Categories Legal Disputes

Section 65B : The Indian Evidence act 1872

Section 65B: Admissibility of electronic records.—

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, any information contained in an electronic record which is printed on a paper, stored, recorded or copied in optical or magnetic media produced by a computer (hereinafter referred to as the computer output) shall be deemed to be also a document, if the conditions mentioned in this section are satisfied in relation to the information and computer in question and shall be admissible in any proceedings, without further proof or production of the original, as evidence of any contents of the original or of any fact stated therein of which direct evidence would be admissible.

(2) The conditions referred to in sub-section (1) in respect of a computer output shall be the following, namely:—

(a) the computer output containing the information was produced by the computer during the period over which the computer was used regularly to store or process information for the purposes of any activities regularly carried on over that period by the person having lawful control over the use of the computer;

(b) during the said period, information of the kind contained in the electronic record or of the kind from which the information so contained is derived was regularly fed into the computer in the ordinary course of the said activities;

(c) throughout the material part of the said period, the computer was operating properly or, if not, then in respect of any period in which it was not operating properly or was out of operation during that part of the period, was not such as to affect the electronic record or the accuracy of its contents; and

(d) the information contained in the electronic record reproduces or is derived from such information fed into the computer in the ordinary course of the said activities.

(3) Where over any period, the function of storing or processing information for the purposes of any activities regularly carried on over that period as mentioned in clause (a) of sub-section (2) was regularly performed by computers, whether—

(a) by a combination of computers operating over that period; or

(b) by different computers operating in succession over that period; or

(c) by different combinations of computers operating in succession over that period; or

(d) in any other manner involving the successive operation over that period, in whatever order, of one or more computers and one or more combinations of computers, all the computers used for that purpose during that period shall be treated for the purposes of this section as constituting a single computer; and references in this section to a computer shall be construed accordingly.

(4) In any proceedings where it is desired to give a statement in evidence by virtue of this section, a certificate doing any of the following things, that is to say,—

(a) identifying the electronic record containing the statement and describing the manner in which it was produced;

(b) giving such particulars of any device involved in the production of that electronic record as may be appropriate for the purpose of showing that the electronic record was produced by a computer;

(c) dealing with any of the matters to which the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) relate, and purporting to be signed by a person occupying a responsible official position in relation to the operation of the relevant device or the management of the relevant activities (whichever is appropriate) shall be evidence of any matter stated in the certificate; and for the purposes of this sub-section it shall be sufficient for a matter to be stated to the best of the knowledge and belief of the person stating it.

(5) For the purposes of this section,—

(a) infomation shall be taken to be supplied to a computer if it is supplied thereto in any appropriate form and whether it is so supplied directly or (with or without human intervention) by means of any appropriate equipment;

(b) whether in the course of activities carried on by any official information is supplied with a view to its being stored or processed for the purposes of those activities by a computer operated otherwise than in the course of those activities, that information, if duly supplied to that computer, shall be taken to be supplied to it in the course of those activities;

(c) a computer output shall be taken to have been produced by a computer whether it was produced by it directly or (with or without human intervention) by means of any appropriate equipment.

Explanation. — For the purposes of this section any reference to information being derived from other information shall be a reference to its being derived therefrom by calculation, comparison or any other process.]

धारा 65B भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम – इलैक्ट्रानिक अभिलेखों की ग्राह्यता —

(1) इस अधिनियम में किसी बात के होते हुए भी, किसी इलैक्ट्रानिक अभिलेख में अंतर्विष्ट किसी सूचना को भी, जो कंप्यूटर द्वारा उत्पादित और किसी कागज पर मुद्रित, प्रकाशीय या चुंबकीय मीडिया में भंडारित, अभिलिखित या नकल की गई हो (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् कंप्यूटर निर्गम कहा गया है), तब एक दस्तावेज समझा जाएगा, यदि प्रश्नगत सूचना और कंप्यूटर के संबंध में, इस धारा में उल्लिखित शर्ते पूरी कर दी जाती है और वह मूल की किसी अंतर्वस्तु या उसमें कथित किसी तथ्य के साक्ष्य के रूप में, जिसका प्रत्यक्ष साक्ष्य ग्राह्य होता, अतिरिक्त सबूत या मूल को पेश किए बिना ही किन्हीं कार्यवाहियों में ग्राह्य होगा।

(2) कंप्यूटर निर्गम की बाबत उपधारा (1) में वर्णित शर्ते निम्नलिखित होंगी, अर्थात् :

(क) सूचना से युक्त कंप्यूटर निर्गम, कंप्यूटर द्वारा उस अवधि के दौरान उत्पादित किया गया था जिसमें उस व्यक्ति द्वारा, जिसका कंप्यूटर के उपयोग पर विधिपूर्ण नियंत्रण था, उस अवधि में नियमित रूप से किए गए किसी क्रियाकलाप के प्रयोजन के लिए, सूचना भंडारित करने या प्रसंस्करण करने के लिए नियमित रूप से कंप्यूटर का उपयोग किया गया था;

(ख) उक्त अवधि के दौरान, इलैक्ट्रानिक अभिलेख में अन्तर्विष्ट किस्म की सूचना या उस किस्म की जिससे इस प्रकार अन्तर्विष्ट सूचना व्युत्पन्न प्राप्त की जाती है, उक्त क्रियाकलापों के सामान्य अनुक्रम में कंप्यूटर में नियमित रूप से भरी गई थी;

(ग) उक्त अवधि के महत्वपूर्ण भाग में अधोपांत, कंप्यूटर समुचित रूप से कार्य कर रहा था अथवा यदि नहीं तो, उस अवधि के उस भाग की बाबत, जिसमें कंप्यूटर समुचित रूप से कार्य नहीं कर रहा था या वह उस अवधि में प्रचालन में नहीं था, ऐसी अवधि नहीं थी जिसमें इलैक्ट्रानिक अभिलेख या उसकी अंतर्वस्तु की शुद्धता प्रभावित होती हो; और

(घ) इलैक्ट्रानिक अभिलेख में अन्तर्विष्ट सूचना ऐसी सूचना से पुनः उत्पादित या व्युत्पन्न की जाती है, जिसे उक्त क्रियाकलापों के सामान्य अनुक्रम में कंप्यूटर में भरा गया था।

(3) जहां किसी अवधि में, उपधारा (2) के खंड (क) में यथा उल्लिखित, उस अवधि के दौरान नियमित रूप से किए गए किन्हीं क्रियाकलापों के प्रयोजनों के लिए सूचना के भंडारण या प्रसंस्करण का कार्य कंप्यूटरों द्वारा नियमित रूप से निष्पादित किया गया था, चाहे वह —

(क) उस अवधि में कंप्यूटरों के प्रचालन के संयोजन द्वारा; या

(ख) उस अवधि में उत्तरोत्तर प्रचालित बिभिन कंप्यूटरों द्वारा; या

(ग) उस अवधि में उत्तरोत्तर प्रचालित कंप्यूटरों के विभिन्न संयोजनों द्वारा; या

(घ) उस अवधि में उत्तरोत्तर प्रचालन को अंतर्वलित करते हुए किसी अन्य रीति में हो, चाहे वह एक या अधिक कंप्यूटरों और एक या अधिक कंप्यूटरों के संयोजनों द्वारा किसी भी क्रम में हो,

उस अवधि के दौरान उस प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग किए गए सभी कंप्यूटर इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए एकल कंप्यूटर के रूप में माने जाएंगे और इस धारा में कंप्यूटर के प्रति निर्देश का तद्नुसार अर्थ लगाया जाएगा।

(4) किन्हीं कार्यवाहियों में:- जहां इस धारा के आधार पर साक्ष्य में विवरण दिया जाना वांछित है, निम्नलिचिात बातों में से किसी बात को पूरा करते हुए प्रमाण पत्र, अर्थात-

(क) विवरण से युक्त इलैक्ट्राॅनिक अभिलेख की पहचान करना और उस रीति का वर्णन करना जिससे इसका उत्पादन किया गया था;

(ख) उस इलैक्ट्राॅनिक अभिलेख के उत्पादन में अन्तर्वलित किसी युक्ति को ऐसी विशिष्टियां देना, जो यह दर्शित करने के प्रयाजन के लिए समुचित हों कि इलैक्ट्राॅनिक अभिलेचा का कम्प्यूटर द्वारा उत्पादन किया गया था;

(ग) ऐसे विषयों में से किसी पर र्कावाई करना, जिससे उपधारा (2) में उल्लिखित शर्तें संबंधित है, और किसी ऐसे व्यक्ति द्वारा हस्ताक्षर किए जाने के लिए तात्पर्यित होना, जो सुसंगत युक्ति के प्रचालन या सुसंगत क्रियाकलाप के प्रबंध के (जो भी समुचित हों) संबंध में उत्तरदायी पदीय हैसियत में हो, प्रमाणपत्र में कथित किसी विषय का साक्ष्य होगा; और इस उपधारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए किसी ऐसे विषय के लिए यह कथन पर्याप्त होगा कि यह कािन करने वाले व्यक्ति के सर्वोत्तम ज्ञान और विश्वास आधारा पर कहा गया है।

(5) इस धाारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए:-

(क) सूचना किसी कम्प्यूटर को प्रदाय की गई समझी जाएगी यदि यह किसी समूचित रूप में प्रदाय की गई है, चाहे इस प्रकार किया गया प्रदाय सीधे (मानव मध्यक्षेप सहित या रहित) या किसी समुचित उपस्कर के माध्यम द्वारा किया गया हो;

(ख) चाहे किस पदधारी द्वारा किए गए क्रियाकलापों के अनुक्रम में सूचना इसके भंडारित या प्रसंस्कृत किए जाने की दृष्टि से उक्त क्रियाकलापों के अनुक्रम से अन्यथा प्रचालित कम्प्यूटर द्वारा उक्त क्रियाकलापों के प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रदाय की जाती है, वह सूचना, यदि सम्यक् रूप से उस कम्प्यूटर को प्रदाय की जाती है तो, उन क्रियाकलापों के अनुक्रम में प्रदाय की गई समझी जाएगी;

(ग) कम्प्यूटर उत्पाद को कम्प्यूटर द्वारा उत्पादित समझा जाएगा, चाहे यह इसके सीधे उत्पादित हो (मानव मध्यक्षेत सहित या रहित) या किसी समुचित उपस्कर के माध्यम से हो।

स्पष्टीकरण – इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए, अनरू सूचना से व्युत्पन्न की गई सूचना के प्रति कोई निर्देश, परिकलन, तुलना या किसी अन्य प्रक्रिया द्वारा उससे व्युत्पन्न के प्रति निर्देश होगा।

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly regarded advocate based in Ahmedabad, known for his expertise in criminal law. As a distinguished lawyer at the Gujarat High Court, he specializes in a wide range of legal matters, making him a sought-after professional in various areas of law. Some of his notable specializations include handling cases related to cheque bounce, property disputes, cybercrime, court marriages, divorces, debt recovery tribunals (DRT), FIR quashing, land revenue disputes, anticipatory bail, PASA (Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act), family law, civil law, and more. Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Categories Criminal Cases, Criminal Lawyer

Section : 304A in The Indian Penal Code

Section 304A in The Indian Penal Code

[304A. Causing death by negligence. — Whoever causes the death of any person by doing any rash or negligent act not amounting to culpable homicide, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.]

304A IPC – लापरवाही से मौत का कारण।

जो कोई भी उतावलेपन या लापरवाही से किसी व्यक्ति की मृत्यु का कारण बनता है, जो गैर इरादतन मानव वध की कोटि में नहीं आता है, उसे किसी एक अवधि के लिए कारावास जिसे दो वर्ष तक बढ़ाया जा सकता है, या जुर्माना, या दोनों के साथ दंडित किया जाएगा।

304B. Dowry death. (1) Where the death of a woman is caused by any burns or bodily injury or occurs otherwise than under normal circumstances within seven years of her marriage and it is shown that soon before her death she was subjected to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any relative of her husband for, or in connection with, any demand for dowry, such death shall be called “dowry death”, and such husband or relative shall be deemed to have caused her death.

भारतीय दंड संहिता की धारा 304ख के अनुसार, (1) जहां किसी स्त्री की मॄत्यु किसी दाह या शारीरिक क्षति द्वारा कारित की जाती है या उसके विवाह के सात वर्ष के भीतर सामान्य परिस्थितियों से अन्यथा हो जाती है और यह दर्शित किया जाता है कि उसकी मॄत्यु के कुछ पूर्व उसके पति ने या उसके पति के किसी नातेदार ने, दहेज की किसी मांग के लिए, या उसके संबंध में, उसके साथ क्रूरता की थी या उसे तंग किया था वहां ऐसी मॄत्यु को दहेज मॄत्यु कहा जाएगा और ऐसा पति या नातेदार उसकी मॄत्यु कारित करने वाला समझा जाएगा ।

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly regarded advocate based in Ahmedabad, known for his expertise in criminal law. As a distinguished lawyer at the Gujarat High Court, he specializes in a wide range of legal matters, making him a sought-after professional in various areas of law. Some of his notable specializations include handling cases related to cheque bounce, property disputes, cybercrime, court marriages, divorces, debt recovery tribunals (DRT), FIR quashing, land revenue disputes, anticipatory bail, PASA (Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act), family law, civil law, and more. Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Categories Cheque Bounce Lawyer

Negotiable Instruments act 1881 : Section 141 | Advocate Paresh M Modi

Judgement:

Harshendra Kumar D.v Rebatilata Koley Etc., 2011 (1) Bank Cas 685:2011 (1) Crimes 280: 2011 (3) SCC 351: 2011 (1) SCC (Cri) 1139: 2011 Cri LJ 1626:2011 (2) JT 586:2011 (5) SCJ 394: AIR 2011 SC 1090.

Negotiable Instruments act, 1881-Section 141 – Liability of Director-A director’s resignation accepted by company,he cannot be held accountable and fastened with liability for anything done by company after acceptance of his res-ignation-words every person at time of offence was committed must be deter-mined on date of offence to have been committed.

વટાઉખત અધિનિયમ 1881-કલમ 141-ડાયરેકટરની જવાબદારી-ડાયરેકટરનું રાજીનામું કંપની દ્રારા સ્વીકારાયુ-તેના રાજીનામા સ્વીકાર્યા બાદના વ્યવહાર માટે તે જવાબદાર નવી-શબ્દ “કોઇ પણ વયકિત”-ગુનો થયો ત્યારે તે તારીખે જે વ્યકિત હોય તે જવાબદાર.

Harshendra Kumar D.v Rebatilata Koley Etc., 2011 (1) Bank Cas 685:2011 (1) Crimes 280: 2011 (3) SCC 351: 2011 (1) SCC (Cri) 1139: 2011 Cri LJ 1626:2011 (2) JT 586:2011 (5) SCJ 394: AIR 2011 SC 1090.

Negotiable Instruments Act,1881-S.141-Offience by Company Complaint against Managing Director-At the relevant time the accused director was in no way connected with the affairs of the Company-He ceased to be a director when cheques alleged to have been signed-Held, in the absence of specific averment as to the role of the consent director and particularly in view of the materials that at the relevant time the consent director was in no way con-nected with the affairs of the Company, the Quashing of process was proper-Principles for creating a liability under the Section stated.

વટાઉખત અધિનિયમ 1881-કલમ 141-કંપની દ્રારા ગુંહો-મેનેજીંગ ડિરેકટર વિરુધ્ધ ફરીયાદ-પ્રસ્તુત સમયે આરોપી ડિરેકટર કંપનીના કામકાજ સાથે સંકળાયેલા ન હતા-જયારે ચેકમાં સહી કરવામાં આવેલ હોવાનો આક્ષેપ કરવામાં આવ્યો ત્યારે તેઓનો ડિરેકટર તરીકે અંત આવેલ-ઠરાવ્યું કે, સંબધિત ડિરેકટરના પાઠ માટે વિશિષ્ટ અનુમાનના અભાવે અને ખાસ કરીને તે બાબતોનો ધ્યાનમાં લઇને કે પ્રસ્તુત સમયે ડિરેકટર કંપનીના કામકાજ સાથે કોઇ પણ રીતે સંકળાયેલા હતા નહિં ત્યારે પ્રકિયા રદ કરવાનું યોગ્ય હતું-કલમ હેઠળ જવાબદારી ઉભી કરવાના સિદ્રાંતો જણાવવામાં આવ્યા.

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly regarded advocate based in Ahmedabad, known for his expertise in criminal law. As a distinguished lawyer at the Gujarat High Court, he specializes in a wide range of legal matters, making him a sought-after professional in various areas of law. Some of his notable specializations include handling cases related to cheque bounce, property disputes, cybercrime, court marriages, divorces, debt recovery tribunals (DRT), FIR quashing, land revenue disputes, anticipatory bail, PASA (Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act), family law, civil law, and more. Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.

Categories Legal Disputes

Section 18 : The Indian Evidence Act 1872

Section 18 : Admission by party to proceeding or his agent —

Statements made by a party to the proceeding, or by an agent to any such party, whom the Court regards, under the circumstances of the case, as expressly or impliedly authorized by him to make them, are admissions.

By suitor in representative character — Statements made by parties to suits, suing or sued in a representative character, are not admissions, unless they were made while the party making them held that character. Statements made by—

(1) Party interested in subject-matter — persons who have any proprietary or pecuniary interest in the subject-matter of the proceeding, and who make the statement in their character of persons so interested, or

(2) Person from whom interest derived — persons from whom the parties to the suit have derived their interest in the subject-matter of the suit, are admissions, if they are made during the continuance of the interest of the persons making the statements.

धारा 18 -स्वीकृति-कार्यवाही के पक्षकार या उसके अभिकर्ता द्वारा-

वे कथन स्वीकृतियां हैं, जिन्हें कार्यवाही के किसी पक्षकार ने किया हो, या ऐसे किसी पक्षकार के ऐसे किसी अभिकर्ता ने किया हो, जिसे मामले कि परिस्थितियों में न्यायालय उन कथनों को करने के लिए उस पक्षकार द्वारा अभिव्यक्त या विवक्षित रूप से प्रधिकृत किया हुआ मानता है।

प््रतिनिधिक रूप से वादकर्ता द्वारा- वाद के ऐसे पद्वाकारों द्वारा, जो प्रतिनिधिक हैसियत में वाद ला रहे हो, किए गए कथन, जब तक िकवे उस समय न किए गए हो जबकि उनको काने वाला पक्षकार वैसी हैसियत धारण करता था, स्वीकृतियां नहीं है।

(1) विषयवस्तु में हितबद्ध पक्षकार द्वारा– ऐसे व्यक्तियों द्वारा किए गए हैं, जिनका कार्यवाही की विषयवस्तु में कोई साम्प्रत्तिक या धन संबंधी हित है और जो इस प्रकार हितबद्ध व्यक्तियों की हैसियत में वह कथन करते है, अथवा

(2) उस व्यक्ति द्वारा जिससे व्युत्पन्न हुआ हो– ऐस व्यक्तियों द्वारा किए गए है।, जिनसे वाद के पक्षकारों का वाद की विषय-वस्तु में अपना हित व्युत्पन्न हुआ है,यदि वे कथन उन्हें करने वाले व्यक्तियों के हित के चालू रहने के दौरान में किए गए है।

Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly regarded advocate based in Ahmedabad, known for his expertise in criminal law. As a distinguished lawyer at the Gujarat High Court, he specializes in a wide range of legal matters, making him a sought-after professional in various areas of law. Some of his notable specializations include handling cases related to cheque bounce, property disputes, cybercrime, court marriages, divorces, debt recovery tribunals (DRT), FIR quashing, land revenue disputes, anticipatory bail, PASA (Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act), family law, civil law, and more. Advocate Paresh M Modi is a highly skilled lawyer practicing at the Gujarat High Court Lawyer in Ahmedabad. With his extensive experience and expertise, He has established himself as a renowned advocate in the region. Stay connected with him on social media for updates:

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube

Follow Advocate Paresh M Modi, the esteemed lawyer, for valuable insights, legal analysis, and engaging discussions. Stay informed about the law and legal developments through his informative content. In the meantime, check out other Information from Home Page, or call us at Landline No: +91-79-48001468 or Phone & WhatsApp No: +91 99250 02031.